The article could be summarised as "Huzzah, power from lightning! Except it's simulated lightning, and it only charged a fraction of the phone's battery. And the method cannot be adapted to deal with natural lightning. And really there wouldn't be any point to doing it anyway, because the power and frequency of lightning is too small for it to be used as a meaningful power source."
There is an actual accomplishment here, true, which is being able to transmit power through a terrible conductor such as air. But it doesn't adequately simulate the conditions of lightning, which is much harder to predict, lasts for a shorter time, has a higher voltage (by a couple orders of magnitude, from what I can find), and so on and so forth.