0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Two high school teachers had a threesome with their teenage pupil, police say.English teachers Shelley Dufresne and Rachel Respess are accused of sleeping with the 17-year-old boy earlier this month after taking him to Respess' apartment following a football game.
It doesn't concern you, Sister, that kind of absolutist view of the universe? Right and wrong determined solely by a single all-knowing, all powerful being whose judgment cannot be questioned and in whose name the most horrendous acts can be sanctioned without appeal?
Being required by someone else’s religious beliefs to behave contrary to one’s sexual identity is degrading and disrespectful.
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/police-investigating-after-student-videoed-4364615QuoteTwo high school teachers had a threesome with their teenage pupil, police say.English teachers Shelley Dufresne and Rachel Respess are accused of sleeping with the 17-year-old boy earlier this month after taking him to Respess' apartment following a football game.I'm posting the Mirror article because other sources I've found for the story are then full of comments about how lucky the boy is.
The two women, teachers at Destrehan High School in Louisiana, now face charges including carnal knowledge of a juvenile, contributing to delinquency of a juvenile and indecent behaviour with a juvenile, news channel WGNO reports.
Quote from: ArticleThe two women, teachers at Destrehan High School in Louisiana, now face charges including carnal knowledge of a juvenile, contributing to delinquency of a juvenile and indecent behaviour with a juvenile, news channel WGNO reports....Why not statutory rape? Isn't that what this falls under?
Louisiana§ 14-80§ 14. 80. 1 Felony carnal knowledge of a juvenile is sexual intercourse with consent between (1) someone age 19 or older and someone between age 12 and 17 or (2) someone age 17 or older and someone between age 12 and 15. (Penalty: up to 10 years in prison, possibly with hard labor.)Misdemeanor carnal knowledge of a juvenile is sexual intercourse with consent between someone age 17 to 19 and someone age 15 to 17 when the difference in their ages is greater than two years. (Penalty: up to six months in prison.)
Toddlers get too much exercise, they wouldn't make good veal.
Only in America.EDIT: Is it bad that I read "student" as "elephant"?
Quote from: Eiki-mun on October 05, 2014, 04:26:22 pmQuote from: ArticleThe two women, teachers at Destrehan High School in Louisiana, now face charges including carnal knowledge of a juvenile, contributing to delinquency of a juvenile and indecent behaviour with a juvenile, news channel WGNO reports....Why not statutory rape? Isn't that what this falls under?The age of consent in Louisiana is 17, so no, it isn't. The charges were probably filed because there is evidence that the relationship began when he was 16.
Ah, okay, that explains it. I thought the crime went by the same name everywhere.
How does the victim feel about this turn of events, that is, having sex with two of his teachers...Well, on the one hand breach of student / teacher whatever, on the other, where do I find these women?
