you basically elaborated on my oversimplified and slightly badly worded viewpoint, if we take "the majority" to be "wealthy white dudes". i should've said "the economic elite", or somesuch.
frankly, i'm against any kind of segregating. it only leads to things like not understanding others, or worse, xenophobia (using "xenos" as "people different than me", not "foreigners"). i don't see why i should ban a woman from my activities based on her gender, why should she be allowed to do the same to me?
yeah, i know, rapists exist, they traumatize people, something something viper's nest. not going there on the issue. but it's just as silly banning one gender on a cautious principle as it is banning a race. men rape, blacks steal, jews jew, and latinos are secret cartel members. of all i said, only the first one still seems to be politically correct. if i say women whore themselves out to gain social standing, i'll get doxxed in the next 15 minutes. there's something wrong with that.
rather than gather all the victims in one place, where the conversation will devolve in an echo chamber quickly (see some communities on tumblr), why not gather the offenders and drill the harmful out of their system? why should i be de facto penalized for having a wang when it's one man doing the raping? why should a black be penalized because a black steals? why should a woman be penalized based on the actions of another? because it's easier that way? maybe, but it's not fair.
i fear that having safe spaces that ban others ban both the evil (which is good), but also the good (which is bad). echo chambers will vilify others based on principle and forget the decent majority. how is that any different from a redneck hating mexicans?
so far, in my life, i've been assaulted by 2 africans, three "arabs"*, and been attacked by four women. for each african that assaulted me, i met their nice counterpart. same goes for the "arabs"*. the women... ah, who am i kidding, they were classic abusers, absolutely no different than their male bully counterparts. of course i met civil women. most women i meet in fact.
now, were i to have integrated an echo chamber, i'd be a misogynistic racist. i still believe there is goodness in this world. therapy and meditation help. it's taken me years of aversion therapy just to suppress the abuse i was dealt, but it's possible, and every woman i meet who does not fit into the mold of the women who abused me reinforces my outlook that i just stumbled on bad seeds. but as they say, "once burned, twice shy".
as a result, every person i meet will be met with skepticism and caution until proven otherwise. it's not fair to the genuinely nice people i meet on a regular basis, but it only lasts for the first contact. once i establish that someone is not good for me, i politely break off contact and go out of my way to avoid them. this way, i can concentrate on the good eggs, not the negative aspects of living in modern society.
of course, i wouldn't be surprised if my viewpoint got entirely disregarded because i'm a cishet white man and frankly, what do i know about social justice? it won't be the first time.
*i put "arabs" in quotes because technically they're north africans, not from the arabic peninsula. but to uncultured and xenophobic reactionnaries, they're the same thing.