Video's been removed now, unfortunately.
So it has, and it says that he removed it, not Youtube.
It's funny because for all of his machismo, he sure doesn't stand by his guns when it implicates him.
Oh well, have one that's nearly as bad:
He seems more like a windbag to me. All talk and no action. Kind of like the teabaggers that wave their guns around at rallies and yell about overthrowing the president. Sure, they're technically terrorists, but in practice they're about as much of a threat as a pissed off chihuahua.
He's forming a militia. As far as I'm concerned, we shouldn't give him a chance to
be a threat.
We could very easily have a Bin Laden 2.0, along with All American Al Qaeda. We might not, but he's encouraging violence against anyone who disagrees with him, and unlike in Australia, he can actually buy the stuff he needs to equip his militia to the teeth.
I *hope* that he's just a windbag. But at the same time, why give him the chance to prove us otherwise? He's expressed the desire to use violence to get his way, and last I checked, forming a terrorist group is illegal, even if you haven't actually done anything yet.
EDIT:
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/05/15/libtard-hating-ex-police-chief-is-back-with-profane-video-rant-and-reality-tv-show-deal/This article has a copy of the video I posted in my OP.
