« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Smut 4 Smut  (Read 4582 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline jlujan69

  • Neonate
  • *
  • Posts: 9
  • Gender: Male
Smut 4 Smut
« on: April 04, 2012, 07:04:46 am »
Logged
Yeah, I'm a Fundy and I've probably said a darndest thing or two since becoming one.

Cloudy

  • Guest
Re: Smut 4 Smut
« Reply #1 on: April 04, 2012, 02:18:48 pm »
Huh.  I'm not really sure how I feel about this.  I get the point they're trying to make, but it almost seems like a five-year-old jumping up and down screaming "pay attention to me!!!!".  It's being provocative for the sake of being provocative.  Atheists have a bad enough reputation as it is...this probably isn't going to make it any better.  Then again, I guess the fundies are going to demonize us no matter what we do anyway.
Logged

Offline MadCatTLX

  • The Beast
  • *****
  • Posts: 2095
  • Gender: Male
Re: Smut 4 Smut
« Reply #2 on: April 04, 2012, 02:39:14 pm »
As much as this seems stupid, I totally get their point. The bible does have some pretty erotic things in it. Lot and his daughters comes to mind. By the way, if you offer your daughters to people you think are rapists, YOUR NOT A GOOD PERSON!

The funniest part is that most of the fundier Christians have sizable porn collections. Then there's the Jesus rule 34 pictures I've seen.
Logged
History is full of maniacs, my friend, men and women of intelect, highly perceptive individuals, who's brilliant minds know neither restraint nor taboo. Such notions are the devils we must slay for the edification of pony-kind. Even if said edification means violating the rules of decency, society, and rightousness itself.
                                                                                                                                                             -Twilight Sparkle, MAGIC.mov

Offline N. De Plume

  • Mysterious Writing Implement
  • The Beast
  • *****
  • Posts: 1936
  • Gender: Male
  • Nom, nom, nom…
Re: Smut 4 Smut
« Reply #3 on: April 04, 2012, 07:19:06 pm »
Quote from: MadCatTLX on April 04, 2012, 02:39:14 pm
As much as this seems stupid, I totally get their point. The bible does have some pretty erotic things in it. Lot and his daughters comes to mind.

I’ve always been a Song of Solomon man, myself.
Logged
-A Pen Name

Offline Stormwarden

  • The Beast
  • *****
  • Posts: 997
  • Gender: Male
Re: Smut 4 Smut
« Reply #4 on: April 04, 2012, 09:05:39 pm »
Let's not forget King David, after all. You won't find their definition of marriage from anyone save Adam and Eve...and yeah, Abraham was married to Sarah, but he also screwed a servant to get his son in the first place. I don't think their idea of marriage was as common as they think it was with their main cast....
Logged


Be the Ultimate Ninja! Play Billy Vs. SNAKEMAN today!

Offline Atavist

  • Pope
  • ****
  • Posts: 327
  • Gender: Male
Re: Smut 4 Smut
« Reply #5 on: April 05, 2012, 01:38:24 am »
Hell, even Jesus had two fathers.
Logged
I am too lost for shame
That it moves me unto mirth,
But I can vision a Hell of flame
For I have lived on Earth.

Cloudy

  • Guest
Re: Smut 4 Smut
« Reply #6 on: April 05, 2012, 02:18:16 am »
Quote from: Atavist on April 05, 2012, 01:38:24 am
Hell, even Jesus had two fathers.

And one of them was basically himself....
Logged

Offline myusername

  • Bishop
  • ***
  • Posts: 226
Re: Smut 4 Smut
« Reply #7 on: April 05, 2012, 03:44:38 am »
Quote from: Stormwarden on April 04, 2012, 09:05:39 pm
Let's not forget King David, after all. You won't find their definition of marriage from anyone save Adam and Eve...and yeah, Abraham was married to Sarah, but he also screwed a servant to get his son in the first place. I don't think their idea of marriage was as common as they think it was with their main cast....

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=um_DgYZRCdk" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=um_DgYZRCdk</a>
Logged

Offline Quasirodent

  • Pope
  • ****
  • Posts: 333
  • You knew it in your heart all along.
Re: Smut 4 Smut
« Reply #8 on: April 05, 2012, 05:08:29 pm »
A question for those who've read more of the Bible than I have:
The scenarios being pointed out, the rape, sex, incest, polygamy, whatever have you, are they written about in a way that's meant to be erotic?  Or are they framed in a storytelling way as many other old stories set in a more brutal and oppressive time, dealing with similar themes, are written?

Not that being non-erotic makes it any less nonsense, it's just not sexy nonsense, and the comparison to pornography falls flat.
Logged
Jesus had two dads and he turned out okay.

Offline TheL

  • The Cock Teasing Teacher
  • The Beast
  • *****
  • Posts: 2220
  • Gender: Female
  • Fly like cheese sticks.
Re: Smut 4 Smut
« Reply #9 on: April 05, 2012, 06:08:26 pm »
Quote from: Quasirodent on April 05, 2012, 05:08:29 pm
A question for those who've read more of the Bible than I have:
The scenarios being pointed out, the rape, sex, incest, polygamy, whatever have you, are they written about in a way that's meant to be erotic?  Or are they framed in a storytelling way as many other old stories set in a more brutal and oppressive time, dealing with similar themes, are written?

Not that being non-erotic makes it any less nonsense, it's just not sexy nonsense, and the comparison to pornography falls flat.

It's non-erotic, but at the same time, it's never explicitly condemned, except in the specific case of David and Bathsheba.  And that's only because David essentially had Bathsheba's husband killed so he could marry her.
Logged
"Half the reason that I like foreign music is because I can kid myself that "Shake dat ass" is more poetic in Hindi."
--Sanda

Move every 'sig.'  For great justice!

Offline Barbarella

  • The Beast
  • *****
  • Posts: 2767
  • Gender: Female
  • A Little REY of Sunshine!
Re: Smut 4 Smut
« Reply #10 on: April 07, 2012, 11:00:55 am »
Quote from: TheL on April 05, 2012, 06:08:26 pm
Quote from: Quasirodent on April 05, 2012, 05:08:29 pm
A question for those who've read more of the Bible than I have:
The scenarios being pointed out, the rape, sex, incest, polygamy, whatever have you, are they written about in a way that's meant to be erotic?  Or are they framed in a storytelling way as many other old stories set in a more brutal and oppressive time, dealing with similar themes, are written?

Not that being non-erotic makes it any less nonsense, it's just not sexy nonsense, and the comparison to pornography falls flat.

It's non-erotic, but at the same time, it's never explicitly condemned, except in the specific case of David and Bathsheba.  And that's only because David essentially had Bathsheba's husband killed so he could marry her.

After knocking her up, of course.

I LOVE "The Song Of Solomon". It's very beautiful and VERY erotic! A sumptuous love poem full of super-sexy oral-sex innuendo! OOH LA LAAAA!
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »