Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1
I mean the bigotry from South Dakotans assuming he would enjoy getting raped in prison is disgusting and inexcusable. But the guy is also a sociopathic murderer so. So they're both disgusting in different ways?  *shrugs*
2
A bit more additional info:

a) He is a cold blooded killer and a sociopath. There's no question of that, he confessed the murder.

b) The murder happened in the nineties.

https://eu.argusleader.com/story/news/2014/02/02/charles-rhines-death-undeserved-murderer-contends/5147197/
3
South Dakota - the Taliban-ruled Afghanistan of the United States.
4
This is not a joke.

Quote
During deliberations, the jury had often discussed the fact that Mr. Rhines was gay and there was “a lot of disgust” about it, one juror recalled in an interview, according to the court petition. Another said that jurors knew he was gay and “thought that he shouldn’t be able to spend his life with men in prison.” A third recounted hearing that if the jury did not sentence Mr. Rhines to death, “if he’s gay, we’d be sending him where he wants to go.”

The justices rejected Mr. Rhines’s plea to hear his bias claim, allowing his death sentence to stand despite disturbing evidence that it may have been the result of anti-L.G.B.T. animus. As usual, the court gave no explanation for its decision not to review the case. But its silence sent a deeply troubling message about the value placed on the lives of L.G.B.T. people.

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/19/opinion/charles-rhines-gay-jury-death-row.html

a) The jury seems to believe that getting raped in prison is an intentional part of being punished for crime and not a cruel and/or unusual punishment.

b) The jury seems to believe that gay men will enjoy being raped.

c) The jury also seems to believe that having a gay man executed for the crime that would merely send a straight man to prison is fair.

d) It also seems that the supreme court agrees with all of this and the execution will happen.


USA? What is wrong with you?
5
Society and History / Re: Not-Good Things People Say on the Internet
« Last post by ironbite on June 23, 2018, 05:40:08 pm »
Sorry but....I guess Genghis Khan's empire doesn't count.
6
Society and History / Re: Not-Good Things People Say on the Internet
« Last post by Lana Reverse on June 23, 2018, 05:14:30 pm »
Found in a thread discussing overpopulation:

Quote
The problem is that Aryan founded civilized nations (Slavs and Asians do not do this) view the sub-Saharan blacks as equals/victims/inferiors-who-need-'help.' This artificially grows the population, but never improves their 'civilization' because they naturally keep having offspring until resources run out and then there is starvation ect… that requires more 'help' that further balloons their population, while shrinking the Aryan population as these resources are not going to Aryans who require a higher-standard of living i.e. more resources for each child. The 'help' also now means directly importing feral black males into Aryan homelands… who can we thank for this 'enrichment' lol

The fantasy example would be Elves (the stupid elf meme is equivalent to the holyjew dumb blonde meme) feeling sorry for the orcs/trolls being stupid, ugly, and aggressive and giving them everything they have including their females, till their are no more Elves to care for the greatly increased numbers of orcs/trolls and they go back to fighting over what is left, and nature once again rules.

Pathological altruism is embedded in the western mind via the devolutionary mind virus of Christianity, Communism, and now 'Social Justice'… interestingly enough all these anti-nature dogmas are creations of Jews.

If you really wanted to help the Blacks (I don't know why you should care if you are not Black) the answer is to institute a one child policy for black women, and sterilize black males. This would gradually make an improved hybridized version of their race, while still retaining the main characteristics as black genetics are dominant. A good example of this is Somalia, where Arabs have raped their black sex slaves for millennia. More recent examples include Chinese men in Africa impregnating black women… the result is the Blasian, AMxBF is an example of good hybridization. In contrast BMxWF produces basically just more blacks. Genetically a coal-burner's offspring will be Black.  The Coal-burner will have more in common genetically with a random white person than her own children.
7
Politics and Government / Re: Mr. Trump Goes to Washington
« Last post by Lana Reverse on June 22, 2018, 10:15:53 pm »
HAHAHAH!  LANA THINKS WE DON'T HAVE MEMORIES!

If you're so sure, then prove it. Show me where I said I was trans. And I'm sure that even if you manage to apparently find something, it can easily be debunked.
8
Politics and Government / Re: Mr. Trump Goes to Washington
« Last post by ironbite on June 22, 2018, 08:50:11 pm »
HAHAHAH!  LANA THINKS WE DON'T HAVE MEMORIES!
9
Politics and Government / Re: Mr. Trump Goes to Washington
« Last post by Lana Reverse on June 22, 2018, 08:49:38 pm »
THERE WAS NO TITANIC! IT WAS ALL MADE UP BY HOLLYWOOD TO SELL MOVIES!

Wow, attacking children to promote her agenda? That's low even for Mann Coulter.

Seriously?

If you're going to insult people, can you do so in a way that isn't dripping with casual transmisogyny?

Pardon my ignorance, but how is saying that a cis woman looks mannish transmisogynistic?

Saying that a cis woman "looks mannish" as a way to insult her is transmisogynistic. You know who else is a woman who "looks mannish"? Me. Because, y'know, that extended period where I had lots of testosterone in my bloodstream had side effects. I kind of object to my appearance being used as an insult, for some reason.

Beyond that, that specific phrase has a history of being used to imply Ann Coulter "is really a man". Not because people believed it, of course, but as a reflection of the idea that being a trans woman is shameful and disgusting and so it is a convenient attack on someone you don't like.

OK, I get it now. I'm sorry I offended you, and I won't use that kind of language again.

THERE WAS NO TITANIC! IT WAS ALL MADE UP BY HOLLYWOOD TO SELL MOVIES!

Wow, attacking children to promote her agenda? That's low even for Mann Coulter.

Seriously?

If you're going to insult people, can you do so in a way that isn't dripping with casual transmisogyny?

Pardon my ignorance, but how is saying that a cis woman looks mannish transmisogynistic?

Saying that a cis woman "looks mannish" as a way to insult her is transmisogynistic. You know who else is a woman who "looks mannish"? Me. Because, y'know, that extended period where I had lots of testosterone in my bloodstream had side effects. I kind of object to my appearance being used as an insult, for some reason.

Beyond that, that specific phrase has a history of being used to imply Ann Coulter "is really a man". Not because people believed it, of course, but as a reflection of the idea that being a trans woman is shameful and disgusting and so it is a convenient attack on someone you don't like.

Pretty much. It mind-boggles me that Lana, a trans-woman, does not understand that.

When did I ever say I was trans? In fact, I specifically said I wasn't:

The idea that you can be trans without having gender dysphoria or wanting to transition seems strange to me, but then again, when it comes to trans people, I'm an outsider looking in.
10
Politics and Government / Re: Mr. Trump Goes to Washington
« Last post by ironbite on June 22, 2018, 08:22:10 pm »
HAH!

Ironbite-it's funny because Lana is Dynamic Paragon.
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10