Yes, because choking the legislative process for 13 hours for the sake of sending good old fashion soldiers in to fuck up and kill the wrong things and die in the process is brilliant.
I mean I agree someone should be held accountable for drone strikes which cause collateral damage, particularly when it's due to faulty intelligence behind the launch. But I really fail to see how drones are any worse than sending soldiers to do the same thing. Which we do. What do people expect, some domestic idiot to 'go missing' in a fucking crater left by a drone strike? or is it just more acceptable to take a few agents out and kill people? Something the CIA was entirely capable of during the 60s, yet rarely did.
It really seems like continuing wank over the use of drones in any capacity they might actually be useful to me. They're the next best thing to people sprouting wings when it comes to searching a large area quickly or any form of reconnaissance. But no one talks about that because OMG we killed someone without a person doing it themselves, it's totally worse than killing people with people.
Maybe I left my bleeding heart at the cleaners or something.