FSTDT Forums

Community => Politics and Government => Topic started by: Askold on March 03, 2017, 03:03:36 pm

Title: Alt-Right
Post by: Askold on March 03, 2017, 03:03:36 pm
Hey, looks like we don't have a thread for this bunch of rabid raccoons yet, so I decided to make one.

Let's start with some recent news: http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2017/02/cpac_invented_an_alternate_history_of_the_alt_right.html

Quote
Shortly after the conference began on Thursday, Dan Schneider, executive director of the American Conservative Union—the group that puts on CPAC—gave a speech denouncing the alt-right as left-wing infiltrators. “There is a sinister organization that is trying to worm its way into our ranks,” he said, arguing that the term “alt-right” had been “hijacked” by a “hate-filled left-wing fascist group.”

So the Alt-Right name actually means that they are leftists?

Quote
Schneider referred specifically to the conference in November where Spencer, standing before a giddy crowd of clean-cut racists, gave a Nazi salute and said, “Heil Trump, heil our people, heil victory!” Schneider’s argument was similar to the one Jonah Goldberg made in his risible book Liberal Fascism: Fascists are inherently left-wing because they believe in government power. (Apparently this is true even when they’re hailing the government power to crush the left.) “Hateful left-wing fascists are not like anybody here,” Schneider said.

Oh, now it makes sense. They are leftists because they are Nazis.

I wonder how the Alt-Right feels now that they've been dumped by the GOP?
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: Id82 on March 03, 2017, 03:29:33 pm
The no true Scotsman fallacy is in full effect in this one.
They can't be part of us because they're Nazis and Nazis are bad, so they must be liberals. Cause Liberals are bad. I mean Liberals are all for equality and personal freedoms and the Nazis were all for the eradication of certain races and strong nationalism see it's like the same thing.
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: fancy_kitten on March 03, 2017, 03:34:34 pm
We only are just now getting a thread on them?  Wow.  My opinion is that they're basically a living contradiction- they claim to be the antithesis of PC culture, but are too cowardly to call themselves what they are (nazis) and respond to differing viewpoints by getting offended and shouting but not making any kind of coherent argument.
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: Id82 on March 03, 2017, 04:51:53 pm
They make fun of SJWs and safe spaces, when in fact they are their own brand of SJW for white people, and have their own safe spaces to hang out on like /pol/, Breitbart and what ever not banned subreddit they're on.
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: pyro on March 04, 2017, 05:26:42 pm
Ex-Anonymous edgelords. How many of them are even old enough to vote?
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: Tolpuddle Martyr on March 04, 2017, 07:32:40 pm
Buzzfeed did a dictionary of dolt-right terms here (https://www.buzzfeed.com/katienotopoulos/a-normal-persons-guide-to-how-far-right-trolls-talk-to-each?utm_term=.efkx7Llo0#.jdEla83GW).

By far the most revealing meme was this one for NEETS (Not in Education, Employment, or Training.)

(https://documents.buzzfeed.com/_NewsDesign/1702XX_altright_glossary/neet.jpg)

See, the true cognoscenti are those that never leave mummies basement to stop playing vidya gaemz and trolling.

And now an alt-righter is running for office in Virginia and wants to legalize child porn and marital rape. (https://wonkette.com/613759/red-pill-libertarian-va-house-candidate-hopes-to-legalize-child-porn-marital-rape-is-lunatic) What a wonderful world. /s
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: Askold on March 05, 2017, 12:44:26 am
Don't forget that that guy is a Libertarian as well.

Meanwhile elsewhere: https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/out-gay-alt-right-the-two-milos/

Quote
But that was just the beginning of the outrage. Rogan went on to press Yiannopoulos further on the subject of pedophilia. He asked if Milo had ever hung out at any of X-Men director Bryan Singer’s alleged parties. This is where the exchange got really sick. Yiannopoulos started talking, at length, about parties he’d been to in Hollywood — parties where the media elite engaged in unprotected sex with underage boys. Every time Rogan asked him to name names, Milo deferred, saying that he “practices discretion.” This is the same Milo who, at his college speeches, singles out students in the audience in order to ridicule them in front of his adoring fans, the same man who says transgendered women should not be allowed in the restrooms comporting with their gender identity, knowing full well he’s exposing them to further victimization. This same man was claiming to practice discretion for pedophiles who also happen to be powerful Hollywood executives. Milo, who has such a bad poker face, couldn’t hide the fact that he was gloating about the sense of privilege he feels to be welcomed into the company of these elite creeps.

...And this is the person they choose to follow.
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: Id82 on March 05, 2017, 07:39:26 am
Hmmmm for some reason i don't see Nathan Larson's message of child porn sticking with the American people.
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: Lana Reverse on March 05, 2017, 10:37:22 am
Buzzfeed did a dictionary of dolt-right terms here (https://www.buzzfeed.com/katienotopoulos/a-normal-persons-guide-to-how-far-right-trolls-talk-to-each?utm_term=.efkx7Llo0#.jdEla83GW).

By far the most revealing meme was this one for NEETS (Not in Education, Employment, or Training.)

(https://documents.buzzfeed.com/_NewsDesign/1702XX_altright_glossary/neet.jpg)

See, the true cognoscenti are those that never leave mummies basement to stop playing vidya gaemz and trolling.

Considering how many factual errors that glossary makes, I don't think it's very credible.

And now an alt-righter is running for office in Virginia and wants to legalize child porn and marital rape. (https://wonkette.com/613759/red-pill-libertarian-va-house-candidate-hopes-to-legalize-child-porn-marital-rape-is-lunatic) What a wonderful world. /s

I think somebody should check his basement. We might have another Ariel Castro on our hands.
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: Tolpuddle Martyr on March 05, 2017, 03:48:23 pm
Buzzfeed did a dictionary of dolt-right terms here (https://www.buzzfeed.com/katienotopoulos/a-normal-persons-guide-to-how-far-right-trolls-talk-to-each?utm_term=.efkx7Llo0#.jdEla83GW).

Considering how many factual errors that glossary makes, I don't think it's very credible.


Considering how you've claimed but cited none of said alleged factual errors I think your statement has the credibility of "all experts agree".

Or at least as much credibility as dear departed forumites Ultimate Paragon and Dynamic Dragon.

But that's none of my business.
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: Lana Reverse on March 05, 2017, 05:52:39 pm
Buzzfeed did a dictionary of dolt-right terms here (https://www.buzzfeed.com/katienotopoulos/a-normal-persons-guide-to-how-far-right-trolls-talk-to-each?utm_term=.efkx7Llo0#.jdEla83GW).

Considering how many factual errors that glossary makes, I don't think it's very credible.


Considering how you've claimed but cited none of said alleged factual errors I think your statement has the credibility of "all experts agree".

Or at least as much credibility as dear departed forumites Ultimate Paragon and Dynamic Dragon.

But that's none of my business.

I play WoW, and I know they got the Alliance-Horde thing backwards. It's Alliance players who read Horde "lol" as "kek". The other way around, it's "bur". That's just the one that stood out to me most.
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: davedan on March 05, 2017, 06:04:08 pm
Buzzfeed did a dictionary of dolt-right terms here (https://www.buzzfeed.com/katienotopoulos/a-normal-persons-guide-to-how-far-right-trolls-talk-to-each?utm_term=.efkx7Llo0#.jdEla83GW).

Considering how many factual errors that glossary makes, I don't think it's very credible.


Considering how you've claimed but cited none of said alleged factual errors I think your statement has the credibility of "all experts agree".

Or at least as much credibility as dear departed forumites Ultimate Paragon and Dynamic Dragon.

But that's none of my business.

I play WoW, and I know they got the Alliance-Horde thing backwards. It's Alliance players who read Horde "lol" as "kek". The other way around, it's "bur". That's just the one that stood out to me most.

But 'kek' is still 'lol'. So the definition in the glossary is correct but there is an error in the origin. Makes me lose all faith in the glossary. Or are you going to suggest we go to 8chan to check it out for ourselves?
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: Tolpuddle Martyr on March 05, 2017, 06:46:06 pm
Buzzfeed did a dictionary of dolt-right terms here (https://www.buzzfeed.com/katienotopoulos/a-normal-persons-guide-to-how-far-right-trolls-talk-to-each?utm_term=.efkx7Llo0#.jdEla83GW).

Considering how many factual errors that glossary makes, I don't think it's very credible.


Considering how you've claimed but cited none of said alleged factual errors I think your statement has the credibility of "all experts agree".

Or at least as much credibility as dear departed forumites Ultimate Paragon and Dynamic Dragon.

But that's none of my business.

I play WoW, and I know they got the Alliance-Horde thing backwards. It's Alliance players who read Horde "lol" as "kek". The other way around, it's "bur". That's just the one that stood out to me most.

But 'kek' is still 'lol'. So the definition in the glossary is correct but there is an error in the origin. Makes me lose all faith in the glossary. Or are you going to suggest we go to 8chan to check it out for ourselves?
Sending a premptive letter to our local police service to reassure them that we aren't stalking/doxxing, part of a Nazi terrorist crew or fapping to things that are illegal to fap to.
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: Lana Reverse on March 07, 2017, 04:13:15 pm
You really want to trust an article with such an obvious and easily correctable mistake? Alright, your funeral.
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: davedan on March 07, 2017, 04:45:36 pm
You really want to trust an article with such an obvious and easily correctable mistake? Alright, your funeral.

Yep because this is important stuff.
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: Tolpuddle Martyr on March 07, 2017, 09:47:54 pm
You really want to trust an article with such an obvious and easily correctable mistake? Alright, your funeral.
That kek is lol but it isn't that iteration of lol?

Internet serious business to eleventy!
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: Eiki-mun on March 07, 2017, 11:17:01 pm
You really want to trust an article with such an obvious and easily correctable mistake? Alright, your funeral.

"Because if they made this one minor, not at all obvious unless you're an absolute World of Warcraft nerd mistake, the whole article is bunk. Burn it all."
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: ironbite on March 08, 2017, 03:42:57 pm
That's straight out of the Goobly Gook playbook too.
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: davedan on March 08, 2017, 04:59:01 pm
I don't know about that. It is however exactly the sort of thing Dynamic Paragon would say. I mean if he decided to come back again and pretend to be someone else. Again.
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: Askold on March 09, 2017, 08:26:59 am
https://www.reddit.com/r/Anarcho_Capitalism/comments/5y9y1o/altright_trigger_warning_the_overwhelming/

Ancap subreddit has been taken over by alt-right and this is what happens when someone tries to argue against racism there.
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: pyro on March 09, 2017, 12:04:42 pm
https://www.reddit.com/r/Anarcho_Capitalism/comments/5y9y1o/altright_trigger_warning_the_overwhelming/

Ancap subreddit has been taken over by alt-right and this is what happens when someone tries to argue against racism there.

I wonder if the mods are going to start waving the banhammer around, or if they're really going to let their sub get eaten alive like this.
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: RavynousHunter on March 09, 2017, 06:36:49 pm
Its an anarchocapitalism subreddit, any rules or enforcement thereof is government and, therefore, bad.
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: Lana Reverse on March 19, 2017, 04:51:39 pm
You really want to trust an article with such an obvious and easily correctable mistake? Alright, your funeral.

"Because if they made this one minor, not at all obvious unless you're an absolute World of Warcraft nerd mistake, the whole article is bunk. Burn it all."

Have you heard of the Murray Gell-Mann Amnesia Effect (http://www.goodreads.com/quotes/65213-briefly-stated-the-gell-mann-amnesia-effect-is-as-follows-you)?

Quote from: Michael Crichton
Briefly stated, the Gell-Mann Amnesia effect is as follows. You open the newspaper to an article on some subject you know well. In Murray's case, physics. In mine, show business. You read the article and see the journalist has absolutely no understanding of either the facts or the issues. Often, the article is so wrong it actually presents the story backward—reversing cause and effect. I call these the "wet streets cause rain" stories. Paper's full of them.

In any case, you read with exasperation or amusement the multiple errors in a story, and then turn the page to national or international affairs, and read as if the rest of the newspaper was somehow more accurate about Palestine than the baloney you just read. You turn the page, and forget what you know.

Just to be perfectly clear, I don't write off entire outlets. OTOH, I am critical of individual writers. If they say something I know isn't true, I'm going to be skeptical of their other claims.

Maybe I'm too pessimistic, but I'd rather be pleasantly surprised than led astray. Especially considering the media's proven dishonesty during the last election.
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: niam2023 on March 19, 2017, 04:55:49 pm
Lana, you're not really gonna try to defend the lugenpresse / fake news thing are you? That is all a product of Donald Trump's deranged mind. And even then I would prefer "dishonest media" to the squealings and squawking of the right wing's army of idiots.

I don't buy into the Amnesia Effect - especially when its just fucking WoW nerdwad terminology.
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: SCarpelan on March 19, 2017, 06:08:41 pm
You really want to trust an article with such an obvious and easily correctable mistake? Alright, your funeral.

"Because if they made this one minor, not at all obvious unless you're an absolute World of Warcraft nerd mistake, the whole article is bunk. Burn it all."

Have you heard of the Murray Gell-Mann Amnesia Effect (http://www.goodreads.com/quotes/65213-briefly-stated-the-gell-mann-amnesia-effect-is-as-follows-you)?

Quote from: Michael Crichton
Briefly stated, the Gell-Mann Amnesia effect is as follows. You open the newspaper to an article on some subject you know well. In Murray's case, physics. In mine, show business. You read the article and see the journalist has absolutely no understanding of either the facts or the issues. Often, the article is so wrong it actually presents the story backward—reversing cause and effect. I call these the "wet streets cause rain" stories. Paper's full of them.

In any case, you read with exasperation or amusement the multiple errors in a story, and then turn the page to national or international affairs, and read as if the rest of the newspaper was somehow more accurate about Palestine than the baloney you just read. You turn the page, and forget what you know.

Just to be perfectly clear, I don't write off entire outlets. OTOH, I am critical of individual writers. If they say something I know isn't true, I'm going to be skeptical of their other claims.

Maybe I'm too pessimistic, but I'd rather be pleasantly surprised than led astray. Especially considering the media's proven dishonesty during the last election.

Gell-Mann amnesia is about messing up a causal relationship or otherwise showing that you don't understand even the basics about an issue. Confusing the factions in WoW is a superficial error if the writer has otherwise understood the causal relationship correctly.

As an example I confused fission with fusion in the essay part of a physics exam in high school. I explained each process 100% accurately except getting these terms the wrong way around. My teacher gave me an almost perfect score from the essay but according to your logic he should have given me 0 points.
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: Kanzenkankaku on May 01, 2017, 07:48:19 pm
Another mistake in the Buzzfeed glossary is saying that Discord is for "far right groups", it's just an IM/Voice chat app for gamers. So yes there would be a presence of far right people, but there's also a far left (for example, Communist) presence on the site as well, same goes for moderates or even apolitical people. Buzzfeed (like much of the media these days) seems to have a knee-jerk reaction to certain new platforms for communication or activities and are prone to start moral panics. This isn't anything new, the Christians back in the 80s made a big deal about how the local D & D dungeonmasters would turn your teenagers into Satanist Liberals, the left is capable of this same fearmongering.
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: Svata on May 01, 2017, 08:44:40 pm
Seriously, I use Discord for Loading Ready Run and The Command Zone.
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: RavynousHunter on May 01, 2017, 08:56:00 pm
That's like saying Reddit is exclusively for manchildren.
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: Sigmaleph on May 01, 2017, 09:16:17 pm
But you see Discord is marketed for gamers, therefore it must be full of the worst gamer stereotypes

I've somehow managed to be on five servers, none of them is about gaming at all except maybe one that technically grew out of a roleplaying group
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: Svata on May 01, 2017, 09:34:21 pm
Mine are both "gaming" related, but one is a tabletop game. The other is, well, very diverse in its interests.
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: Eiki-mun on May 01, 2017, 10:13:25 pm
Another mistake in the Buzzfeed glossary is saying that Discord is for "far right groups", it's just an IM/Voice chat app for gamers. So yes there would be a presence of far right people, but there's also a far left (for example, Communist) presence on the site as well, same goes for moderates or even apolitical people. Buzzfeed (like much of the media these days) seems to have a knee-jerk reaction to certain new platforms for communication or activities and are prone to start moral panics. This isn't anything new, the Christians back in the 80s made a big deal about how the local D & D dungeonmasters would turn your teenagers into Satanist Liberals, the left is capable of this same fearmongering.

You know, I somehow missed that the first time. And considering that I'm on 14 Discord servers, I'd like to think it's for more than just "far right groups".
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: RavynousHunter on May 02, 2017, 07:48:18 am
Our CS club used to use Discord, or so I heard.  Moved to Slack because...fucked if I know?  Its just a pretty IRC, but then again, we're talking about a group with a large proportion of Linux fanboys, so I don't expect much sense in the first place.
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: Askold on May 02, 2017, 09:44:55 am
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/may/02/alt-right-hates-women-non-white-trump-christian-right-abortion

As you can see, the Alt-Right is a heterogenous group with many varying opinions. For example, some oppose abortion because it gives women a choice, while others support abortion because they support eugenics and aborting "defective" or non-white fetuses. Both groups agree that women should not be allowed to make the choice whether or not to abort the fetus they are carrying, so there is still some common ground that they can agree on.

Yes, I know that this sounds like the old joke (possibly from cyanide and happiness, though I can't be certain) but no opinion is too "evil" or "stupid" for the Alt-Right.
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: The_Queen on May 02, 2017, 04:23:12 pm
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/may/02/alt-right-hates-women-non-white-trump-christian-right-abortion

As you can see, the Alt-Right is a heterogenous group with many varying opinions. For example, some oppose abortion because it gives women a choice, while others support abortion because they support eugenics and aborting "defective" or non-white fetuses. Both groups agree that women should not be allowed to make the choice whether or not to abort the fetus they are carrying, so there is still some common ground that they can agree on.

Yes, I know that this sounds like the old joke (possibly from cyanide and happiness, though I can't be certain) but no opinion is too "evil" or "stupid" for the Alt-Right.

Quite. When your political ideology is being the most contemptuous wanker imaginable, these things tend to happen.
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: Askold on May 03, 2017, 04:20:24 am
http://www.wehuntedthemammoth.com/2016/09/08/internet-nazis-now-trying-to-recruit-kids-playing-pokemon-go-apparently/

Neo-Nazis trying to recruit kids. Because:

Quote
The Daily Stormer was designed to appeal to teenagers, but I have long thought that we needed to get pre-teens involved in the movement. At that age, you can really brainwash someone easily. Anyone who accepts Nazism at the age of 10 or 11 is going to be a Nazi for life.

Note the bolded part, they aren't even denying that they are trying to brainwash kids.

The last time I heard of something this heinous was a Pink-Black lesbian saying that they should "recruit" girls into being lesbians because 10 year olds are really malleable and the best way to turn them into lesbians is fucking them until they like it. (Note that I know that that person is not an example of what most LGBT people are like.)
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: kiwimac on May 03, 2017, 05:16:25 am
Everyone knows that the NAZIS were really commies. <sarcasm>


Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: Askold on May 03, 2017, 05:51:17 am
Except the Nazies who instead insist that the pope is a communist.
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: RavynousHunter on May 03, 2017, 06:58:13 am
They forget that one, brainwashing doesn't work that way (the term these dumb apes are looking for is 'indoctrination') and, two, deprogramming is not only a thing, it can happen with normal life experience.  Fuck, I was technically indoctrinated into Christianity as a child, and we all know how well THAT ended up going.
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: ironbite on May 03, 2017, 03:35:44 pm
..........................hey wait a second here.

Ironbite-I'm seeing something that I really shouldn't be.
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: niam2023 on May 03, 2017, 05:03:24 pm
What is that, ironbite?

I think I'm seeing something here myself. The alt-right and Milo...hm, perhaps more appropriate a match than I figured.
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: ironbite on May 03, 2017, 05:39:10 pm
Something personal.

Ironbite-we'll see how it plays out.
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: Askold on May 04, 2017, 12:31:35 am
Meanwhile Milo and the Alt-Right still have a love-hate affair. And by this I mean that Milo insists that the Alt-Right does not hate homosexuals and the Nazi symbolism is all a big joke. Meanwhile the Alt-right insist that they really are Nazis and hate "degenerates" like Milo.
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: niam2023 on May 04, 2017, 01:03:48 am
All while the alt-right talks in a suspiciously "degenerate" fashion about children, and taking advantage of them. And allows such fellows as August Kreis III to join their parties.

They're basically the two people in a rom-com who just cannot admit they were made for each other.
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: Askold on May 06, 2017, 01:31:56 am
Alt-right and 4Chan have tried to influence the elections in France. Not much success apparently.

a) Their "leaked Macron Emails" were poorly faked: https://www.reddit.com/r/europe/comments/69h2ku/macron_offshore_account_4chan_trolls_forgot_to/ http://www.numerama.com/politique/254983-compte-offshore-demmanuel-macron-une-intox-venue-de-4chan.html (adding the Reddit thread because the original is in French and the thread has talk about it in English.)

EDIT: English article about this: http://www.reuters.com/article/us-france-election-macron-leaks-idUSKBN1812AZ

Note that Macron is not allowed to come out and say that the "leaks" are fake or altered because the campaigning has legally ended. And any media (or Le Pen associate) that releases these "leaks" is committing a crime because the campaigning has legally ended and doing anything that might influence the voters is illegal and punishable. Which just means that the only people spreading the leaks are random folks on social media.

b) When they aren't making fake-news they are posting memes IN ENGLISH. Also using the same anti-semitic conspiracy theories that worked well in USA but aren't as popular in France. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/04/technology/french-elections-alt-right-fake-news-le-pen-macron.html?_r=1

Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: Skybison on May 07, 2017, 08:01:59 pm
In Tragic News, thanks to the actions of the Alt-Right, Pepe the Frog has passed away
(http://cbr1.imgix.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Screenshot-2017-05-04-07.50.42.png?auto=format&cs=tinysrgb&q=20&w=462&h=402&fit=crop)
 http://www.cbr.com/pepe-frog-creator-kills-white-supremacist-icon/
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: Kanzenkankaku on May 08, 2017, 03:53:34 am
In Tragic News, thanks to the actions of the Alt-Right, Pepe the Frog has passed away
(http://cbr1.imgix.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Screenshot-2017-05-04-07.50.42.png?auto=format&cs=tinysrgb&q=20&w=462&h=402&fit=crop)
 http://www.cbr.com/pepe-frog-creator-kills-white-supremacist-icon/

Legends can never truly die. He lives on in our hearts.
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: Askold on May 08, 2017, 04:31:19 am
In Tragic News, thanks to the actions of the Alt-Right, Pepe the Frog has passed away
(http://cbr1.imgix.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Screenshot-2017-05-04-07.50.42.png?auto=format&cs=tinysrgb&q=20&w=462&h=402&fit=crop)
 http://www.cbr.com/pepe-frog-creator-kills-white-supremacist-icon/

Legends can never truly die. He lives on in our hearts.

a) Some Alt-Nazis are saying that they'll continue using the frog as a "FUCK YOU" to the artist.

b) Others are planning to steal another character from the same artist as a "FUCK YOU" to the artist.

(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: SomeApe on May 08, 2017, 07:20:45 am
"Pls r8 my rare blepe"
Yahweh, this guys are pathetic idiots.  >:(
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: Kanzenkankaku on May 09, 2017, 03:18:54 am
In Tragic News, thanks to the actions of the Alt-Right, Pepe the Frog has passed away
(http://cbr1.imgix.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Screenshot-2017-05-04-07.50.42.png?auto=format&cs=tinysrgb&q=20&w=462&h=402&fit=crop)
 http://www.cbr.com/pepe-frog-creator-kills-white-supremacist-icon/

Legends can never truly die. He lives on in our hearts.

a) Some Alt-Nazis are saying that they'll continue using the frog as a "FUCK YOU" to the artist.

b) Others are planning to steal another character from the same artist as a "FUCK YOU" to the artist.

(click to show/hide)

Killing Pepe was probably a mistake honestly, it just seems like giving up and letting them win some feel good points.
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: Askold on May 09, 2017, 03:43:36 am
Killing Pepe was probably a mistake honestly, it just seems like giving up and letting them win some feel good points.

Killing Pepe was the artist making sure that everyone know that they do not support Alt-Nazis. And now when the Alt-Nazis use Pepe the artist can go "that character is dead, I no longer draw it."

This is like if you had invented Captain America and then someone rewrote him into being a Nazi. Even if you can't stop people from using the character like that you would like to make sure that everyone knows that you did not intend to make a character who supports National socialism.
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: SomeApe on May 09, 2017, 01:30:17 pm
Killing Pepe was probably a mistake honestly, it just seems like giving up and letting them win some feel good points.

Killing Pepe was the artist making sure that everyone know that they do not support Alt-Nazis. And now when the Alt-Nazis use Pepe the artist can go "that character is dead, I no longer draw it."

This is like if you had invented Captain America and then someone rewrote him into being a Nazi. Even if you can't stop people from using the character like that you would like to make sure that everyone knows that you did not intend to make a character who supports National socialism.

I think people knew that already because the cartoonist distanced himself from the alt-right a couple of times. Killing a comic character just seems silly to me. If I were him I'd just have said: "If you guys have to steal another's character because you lack any creativity and talent to make up your own cartoon figure, oh then have it! Unless you, I can make up something new."
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: RavynousHunter on May 09, 2017, 02:18:10 pm
I'd have just sued them for copyright infringement.
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: Askold on May 09, 2017, 02:30:45 pm
I'd have just sued them for copyright infringement.

...How many Youtube channels do the Alt-Nazis have? It would be amusing to have Youtube start taking their videos down if they have even a single frog in their video...
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: RavynousHunter on May 09, 2017, 04:57:52 pm
Besides, how many would you bet are little dipshit rednecks with more spare time than either money or brain cells?  See just how quickly places like YouTube and 4chan get rid of them when legal threats start coming in.
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: The_Queen on May 09, 2017, 06:52:30 pm
In Tragic News, thanks to the actions of the Alt-Right, Pepe the Frog has passed away
(http://cbr1.imgix.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Screenshot-2017-05-04-07.50.42.png?auto=format&cs=tinysrgb&q=20&w=462&h=402&fit=crop)
 http://www.cbr.com/pepe-frog-creator-kills-white-supremacist-icon/

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jsaTElBljOE

Too long; didn't listen- And nothing of value was lost.
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: Id82 on May 09, 2017, 07:07:18 pm
Is it sad that I always thought the vocalist in that song was a woman?
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: chad sexington on May 11, 2017, 05:43:53 am
Garrison's response: 
(https://i.imgur.com/nKxU3tT.jpg)
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: RavynousHunter on May 11, 2017, 09:56:25 am
Lawsuit.
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: dpareja on May 11, 2017, 10:11:44 am
Lawsuit.

Eh, Garrison's got a point. Pepe's taken on a life of its own independent of Furie, so any "Pepe is dead" gestures on its creator's part aren't really relevant to the broader use of the character, however much Furie might dislike that use.
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: RavynousHunter on May 11, 2017, 10:57:02 am
Lawsuit.

Eh, Garrison's got a point. Pepe's taken on a life of its own independent of Furie, so any "Pepe is dead" gestures on its creator's part aren't really relevant to the broader use of the character, however much Furie might dislike that use.


To which I reiterate: lawsuit.  They are using his intellectual property without his permission, he is legally capable of seeking damages from any infringing party he chooses.  You'd be surprised how fast touching someone's money gets their attention.
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: dpareja on May 11, 2017, 11:01:02 am
Lawsuit.

Eh, Garrison's got a point. Pepe's taken on a life of its own independent of Furie, so any "Pepe is dead" gestures on its creator's part aren't really relevant to the broader use of the character, however much Furie might dislike that use.


To which I reiterate: lawsuit.  They are using his intellectual property without his permission, he is legally capable of seeking damages from any infringing party he chooses.  You'd be surprised how fast touching someone's money gets their attention.

But they've been doing that for years now, and (at least under US law, so far as I understand it), if you don't actively defend your copyright, you're considered to have forfeited it.
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: pyro on May 11, 2017, 03:26:21 pm
But they've been doing that for years now, and (at least under US law, so far as I understand it), if you don't actively defend your copyright, you're considered to have forfeited it.

That's trademark. Totally different.
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: dpareja on May 11, 2017, 03:30:32 pm
But they've been doing that for years now, and (at least under US law, so far as I understand it), if you don't actively defend your copyright, you're considered to have forfeited it.

That's trademark. Totally different.

Ah. OK.
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: chad sexington on May 11, 2017, 09:43:53 pm
Note that Garrison was quick to call his lawyers when 4chan were messing with *his* art.  Now he's been seduced by the alt-right, he has no problem with messing with other people's.
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: Kanzenkankaku on May 12, 2017, 02:28:47 am
Lawsuit.

Eh, Garrison's got a point. Pepe's taken on a life of its own independent of Furie, so any "Pepe is dead" gestures on its creator's part aren't really relevant to the broader use of the character, however much Furie might dislike that use.


To which I reiterate: lawsuit.  They are using his intellectual property without his permission, he is legally capable of seeking damages from any infringing party he chooses.  You'd be surprised how fast touching someone's money gets their attention.

He'd have to prove that what's been happening has cost him any money, and that can be challenging sometimes.
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: RavynousHunter on May 12, 2017, 06:18:58 am
True, but I'd be willing to bet that even a threat of legal action would keep the more organized parties involved away from his work.  I know that were cunts like this using my work for the promotion of outright Nazism, I'd turn the lot of them into paupers.
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: Lana Reverse on May 13, 2017, 12:00:47 am
Good luck. Trying to tell 4chan what they can't do is like trying to herd cats. Cats that have malicious senses of humor and a serious case of misanthropy.
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: Eiki-mun on May 13, 2017, 01:02:18 am
Good luck. Trying to tell 4chan what they can't do is like trying to herd cats. Cats that have malicious senses of humor and a serious case of misanthropy.

So, cats.
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: davedan on May 13, 2017, 11:23:11 pm
Note that Garrison was quick to call his lawyers when 4chan were messing with *his* art.  Now he's been seduced by the alt-right, he has no problem with messing with other people's.

Yeah this is amazingly hypocritical of Garrison.
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: Askold on May 15, 2017, 09:07:26 am
https://www.aol.com/article/news/2017/05/14/protestors-nazi-charlottesville-jackson-lee-white-supremacist-rally/22085869/

Because nothing says PATRIOTISM like promoting ideology of a country that fought your country and going to a memorial to a rebellion that fought your country to declare loyalty to a political rival of your country.
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: Svata on May 15, 2017, 09:10:52 am
https://twitter.com/yourpacrat/status/864010739979345920
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: SomeApe on May 15, 2017, 01:06:19 pm
Quote
It's not possible for white people to be racist
...because then it's called patriotism...
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: Svata on May 15, 2017, 03:25:52 pm
https://twitter.com/Aesctir/status/864198932766892032




I'm done talking to these people
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: pyro on May 15, 2017, 06:45:25 pm
I doubt you ever made a serious attempt to begin with. I know I haven't.
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: Askold on May 23, 2017, 11:07:49 am
Alt-Reich subreddit "Physical removal" announces their first Jewish moderator. In fact, the mod team is very proud to make that announcement because it is proof that they are not Nazis. Nazis hate jews so a group that has a Jewish member cannot be Nazis.

Two things happen immediately:

a) The Nazis in the group get furious at the mention of der Juden and claim that their subreddit has been infiltrated. https://np.reddit.com/r/Physical_Removal/comments/6brt8h/shalom_rphysical_removal_makes_inroads_with/ (Guys, if you are pretending not to be Nazis it only works if you can get everyone to stick with the charade. When most of your group members proudly declare themselves as Nazis no one is going to believe you.)

b) Another subreddit "Against hate subreddits" has a thread about this where they laugh at them and in return the Nazis start crying about Fake-News. https://www.reddit.com/r/Physical_Removal/comments/6cs9wb/ahs_invents_fake_news_against_one_of_our_new_mods/
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: TheContrarian on May 26, 2017, 02:56:52 pm
Note that Garrison was quick to call his lawyers when 4chan were messing with *his* art.  Now he's been seduced by the alt-right, he has no problem with messing with other people's.

Yeah this is amazingly hypocritical of Garrison.

You mean Ben "6 million more" Garrison?  Ben "let's get this shoah on the road" Garrison?  I'd say it's entirely in line with his established character :3
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: Askold on May 27, 2017, 07:45:39 am
Hey, remember how it's all about freedom of speech and just harmless hate speech?

http://www.wweek.com/uncategorized/2017/05/26/witnesses-man-on-northeast-portland-max-train-cut-the-throats-of-two-men-who-tried-to-stop-anti-muslim-bullying-of-women-passengers/

Except, if you tell someone not to shout racist slurs they might stab you.
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: Askold on May 28, 2017, 11:35:09 am
And for anyone who says the the recent domestic-terrorist was a Bernie supporter:

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DA1uQXPUIAAbqhb.jpg:large)
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DA1uQXOUAAAw5S0.jpg:large)
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DA1uQaBUIAEOW-7.jpg:large)

He apparently was a Bernie-Bro early in the elections but went into "I want to join the Trump-SS and kill all Jews" mode at some point.
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: ironbite on May 28, 2017, 04:31:50 pm
So he's like a lot of Bernie-bros upset their boy lost to a woman.

Ironbite-got it.
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: davedan on May 28, 2017, 06:37:20 pm
Note that Garrison was quick to call his lawyers when 4chan were messing with *his* art.  Now he's been seduced by the alt-right, he has no problem with messing with other people's.

Yeah this is amazingly hypocritical of Garrison.

You mean Ben "6 million more" Garrison?  Ben "let's get this shoah on the road" Garrison?  I'd say it's entirely in line with his established character :3

Yeah part of his problem was that people (Nazi's) kept altering his cartoons to make them (more) anti-Semitic. Here is a link to an article about it: https://thenib.com/the-internet-s-most-trolled-cartoonist-91a92d9b7585 (https://thenib.com/the-internet-s-most-trolled-cartoonist-91a92d9b7585)

He was incredibly upset about people messing with his cartoons but has no problem taking over someone else's. Which is why I would call him a hypocrite. Still I have to admit I get a kick out of his cartoons.
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: The_Queen on May 28, 2017, 07:21:58 pm
Hey, remember how it's all about freedom of speech and just harmless hate speech?

http://www.wweek.com/uncategorized/2017/05/26/witnesses-man-on-northeast-portland-max-train-cut-the-throats-of-two-men-who-tried-to-stop-anti-muslim-bullying-of-women-passengers/

Except, if you tell someone not to shout racist slurs they might stab you.

/me waits for a white liberal to explain how it's simply freeze peach
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: Kanzenkankaku on May 29, 2017, 02:48:15 am
And for anyone who says the the recent domestic-terrorist was a Bernie supporter:

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DA1uQXPUIAAbqhb.jpg:large)
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DA1uQXOUAAAw5S0.jpg:large)
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DA1uQaBUIAEOW-7.jpg:large)

He apparently was a Bernie-Bro early in the elections but went into "I want to join the Trump-SS and kill all Jews" mode at some point.

Recent Domestic Terrorist? Was this the mass shooter in like, Mississippi? I think I'm behind on my mentally disturbed murderers.
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: Eiki-mun on May 29, 2017, 04:32:46 am
Portland.
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: SCarpelan on May 29, 2017, 06:23:13 am
Recent Domestic Terrorist? Was this the mass shooter in like, Mississippi? I think I'm behind on my mentally disturbed murderers.

Not a shooter this time, surprisingly. He stabbed three people who tried to stop him harassing two Muslim women in a train killing two of them.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-nation/wp/2017/05/28/brave-and-selfless-oregon-stabbing-victims-hailed-as-heroes/?utm_term=.5d3330e5071d
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: The_Queen on May 29, 2017, 09:47:50 am
Recent Domestic Terrorist? Was this the mass shooter in like, Mississippi? I think I'm behind on my mentally disturbed murderers.

Not a shooter this time, surprisingly. He stabbed three people who tried to stop him harassing two Muslim women in a train killing two of them.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-nation/wp/2017/05/28/brave-and-selfless-oregon-stabbing-victims-hailed-as-heroes/?utm_term=.5d3330e5071d

And on this Memorial Day, the president has said a grand total of nothing about the two veterans that we lost to white supremacy. Though, Casino Mussolini did take time last week to congratulate the Montana Representative who won his race after body-slamming a reporter.
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: TheContrarian on May 29, 2017, 12:27:08 pm
Recent Domestic Terrorist? Was this the mass shooter in like, Mississippi? I think I'm behind on my mentally disturbed murderers.

Not a shooter this time, surprisingly. He stabbed three people who tried to stop him harassing two Muslim women in a train killing two of them.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-nation/wp/2017/05/28/brave-and-selfless-oregon-stabbing-victims-hailed-as-heroes/?utm_term=.5d3330e5071d

And on this Memorial Day, the president has said a grand total of nothing about the two veterans that we lost to white supremacy. Though, Casino Mussolini did take time last week to congratulate the Montana Representative who won his race after body-slamming a reporter.

These days a bodyslam is not a big deal.  It's barely even a transitional move.  Would have been fun if he followed it up with the People's Elbow though.
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: dpareja on May 29, 2017, 12:30:12 pm
Recent Domestic Terrorist? Was this the mass shooter in like, Mississippi? I think I'm behind on my mentally disturbed murderers.

Not a shooter this time, surprisingly. He stabbed three people who tried to stop him harassing two Muslim women in a train killing two of them.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-nation/wp/2017/05/28/brave-and-selfless-oregon-stabbing-victims-hailed-as-heroes/?utm_term=.5d3330e5071d

And on this Memorial Day, the president has said a grand total of nothing about the two veterans that we lost to white supremacy. Though, Casino Mussolini did take time last week to congratulate the Montana Representative who won his race after body-slamming a reporter.

These days a bodyslam is not a big deal.  It's barely even a transitional move.  Would have been fun if he followed it up with the People's Elbow though.

According to the FOX News team who were there, it wasn't just a bodyslam, it was a chokeslam. And apparently a local TV station has footage of the event, but they're refusing to release it. (I hope it gets subpoenaed pronto when the case goes to trial.)
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: Askold on May 29, 2017, 04:41:44 pm
Still a physical assault unless the reporter faked it. (Seeing other news sources have reported seeing the incident I find that unlikely.)
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: TheContrarian on May 30, 2017, 03:20:43 am
Still a physical assault unless the reporter faked it. (Seeing other news sources have reported seeing the incident I find that unlikely.)

1. Can't pull off a proper bodyslam (or a chokeslam for that matter) without the participation of the "victim"

2. The mainstream media would never coalesce around some made-up shit for politically expedient reasons, would they?  It's utterly inconcievable!
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: davedan on May 30, 2017, 03:34:07 am
You think the reporter and the congressmen were in cahoots to prank Fox News?
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: Eiki-mun on May 30, 2017, 04:40:56 am
Still a physical assault unless the reporter faked it. (Seeing other news sources have reported seeing the incident I find that unlikely.)

1. Can't pull off a proper bodyslam (or a chokeslam for that matter) without the participation of the "victim"


Uhh... How d'you figure?
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: SCarpelan on May 30, 2017, 05:31:25 am
Still a physical assault unless the reporter faked it. (Seeing other news sources have reported seeing the incident I find that unlikely.)

1. Can't pull off a proper bodyslam (or a chokeslam for that matter) without the participation of the "victim"


Uhh... How d'you figure?

The keyword here is "proper". He is technically right if he means the wrestling move where the victim throws themselves to the ground as dramatically as possible. In this case, it means grabbing someone by the neck and pushing them to the ground but that doesn't suit his narrative of the liberal media exaggerating an innocent right wing nutjob's violent outburst.
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: TheContrarian on May 30, 2017, 09:45:26 am
Still a physical assault unless the reporter faked it. (Seeing other news sources have reported seeing the incident I find that unlikely.)

1. Can't pull off a proper bodyslam (or a chokeslam for that matter) without the participation of the "victim"


Uhh... How d'you figure?

The keyword here is "proper". He is technically right if he means the wrestling move where the victim throws themselves to the ground as dramatically as possible. In this case, it means grabbing someone by the neck and pushing them to the ground but that doesn't suit his narrative of the liberal media exaggerating an innocent right wing nutjob's violent outburst.

Your description bears little relation to a chokeslam.

Just as "pushing someone over" would bear little relation to a bodyslam.

So, naturally, as you don't feel this is hilariously exaggerated by the media (I mean you've even picked up and run with "bodyslam" as their chosen soundbite), you can show me some footage of this poor little reporter getting hoisted off his feet and upended onto the ebul representative's shoulder then unceremoniously dumped onto the floor.  As reporters aren't generally trained in the art of taking a flat-back bump it should be quite painful watching.

We live in hope...
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: SCarpelan on May 30, 2017, 10:55:00 am
Nice attempt at distracting from the fact that the witnesses also say that the representative went on to punch the reporter several times when he was on the ground which gives some context about how violent the initial contact probably was no matter what you want to call it. What seems to matter more to you is that the witnesses might have used slightly inaccurate language to describe his actions.

I'll stop feeding the troll now. It gets boring fast.
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: TheContrarian on May 30, 2017, 12:07:19 pm
Nice attempt at distracting from the fact that the witnesses also say that the representative went on to punch the reporter several times when he was on the ground which gives some context about how violent the initial contact probably was no matter what you want to call it. What seems to matter more to you is that the witnesses might have used slightly inaccurate language to describe his actions.

I'll stop feeding the troll now. It gets boring fast.

"How can you say that the media is exaggerating, they're simply using 'inaccurate language' to lead people to an inaccurate conclusion!"

Sophistry at its' finest :)
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: SCarpelan on May 30, 2017, 12:27:45 pm
Don't bother. I made my previous post only to point out your little distraction to others who might want to swallow your bait to toy with you.
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: Kanzenkankaku on May 31, 2017, 12:20:04 pm
You think the reporter and the congressmen were in cahoots to prank Fox News?

Well, American Politics has looked like it's been transforming into the WWE the past couple of years...
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: Askold on June 24, 2017, 02:01:20 am
Guess who made a new subreddit even though they have been banned before? Yup, the good ol' Alt-Right.

Linking it now though I doubt it won't take a long time for them to get banned again: https://www.reddit.com/r/altrightsub/

And obviously they haven't changed a bit and threads are all about complaining about (((Jews))) and other groups they hate, death threats, brigading, suicide prompts and thinly veiled or not at all veiled support for genocide.

Ok, there is one thing that is new. Now they like Israel for having tough laws on immigrants and refugees ...but at the same time they mock Jews and "global Jewish media" so the end result is really schizophrenic.
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: dpareja on June 24, 2017, 02:14:27 am
There's two versions of the Alt-Right: the one that thinks they should hate everyone except Jews, because Israel, and the other that also hates Jews (but maybe still likes Israel).
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: Askold on August 21, 2017, 12:53:44 pm
Just bringing this up to point out that the "Unite the right" rally managed to do the opposite and Alt-Right and the other extreme-right groups are now eating each other.

Charlottesville was (for a few minutes) the highlight of Alt-Right. For a single moment they united most of the overly or secretly racist right-wing groups in USA and even after the terrorist attack one of their own did the POTUS didn't condemn them.

...But bragging about the terrorist attack caused the loss of a few websites, subreddits and political support. And after the organizer of the event insulted the dead counterprotester even Richard Spencer and other Alt-Right bigwigs denounced him (Realizing his mistake he first claimed that he had been hacked, conspiracy theorists immediately blamed some third Alt-Right loudmouth causing yet more rivalry between fan-groups. Then the organizer admitted that he made the tweet but said that he had been on drugs at the time. http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-charlottesville-organizer-20170818-story.html ) and causing more splits in the groups despite his hard work in bringing KKK, Nazis and Nazis Alt-Right together. Impressive self destruct that was.

Meanwhile most of GOP has either been publicly outraged at Trump's gaffes or trying to find some sort of way to balance, not appearing Pro-Nazi or anti-Nazi at the same time.

Oh, and Bannon left the White house. As a result The_Donald vs Breitbart split is happening despite Bannon trying to claim that he resigned willingly and is still on Trump's side. ...Instead we have Breitbart fans complaining about the "last honest man" being kicked out of WH and how they must go to war agaisnt Jared and Ivanka (who are EEEVIL Democrats.) and T_D is banning everyone who links Breitbart to their safe space because Trump can't have made any mistakes so Bannon must be an "unperson" now.

They bragged about 8 years of Trump presidency but unless they manage to stop this... clusterfuck of petty rivalries rather than losing 2020 they won't even hold majority after 2018. Seeing how Trump and GOP can't win votes despite it literally being possible only if they themselves vote against their own plans I can only imagine how things will turn out if the Democrats hold the majority.

(I imagine that the incompetent and two-faced Democrats will have at least 10 of theirs vote in support of GOP because we are living in a nightmare and bad guys win. And now I'm sad.)
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: Askold on November 23, 2017, 11:18:47 am
http://www.latimes.com/world/la-fg-poland-spencer-ban-20171122-story.html

Poland knows what to do with Nazis if they try to enter their country to stir up some trouble.
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: Askold on March 28, 2018, 06:46:36 am
It's been a while since this thread saw action but I just had to share this: http://www.wehuntedthemammoth.com/2018/03/27/alt-right-erupts-after-crying-nazi-christopher-cantwell-admits-hes-a-federal-informant/

The famous "crying Nazi" already got his nickname when it turned out that he's not as much of a tough guy as he thought. Now it turns out that he ratted out his friends to stay out of jail. Granted that he claims that he is only providing evidence of how ANTIFA was behind everything, but even the other Nazis aren't buying that.
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: ironbite on March 28, 2018, 05:00:31 pm
Wow so he's a dead man soon.
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: Tolpuddle Martyr on March 28, 2018, 05:21:53 pm
I love how he insists he's squealing to...make the world a better place for the kamerads he's ratting on.

Quote
“There is ample evidence that the reds started and perpetuated the violence of Charlottesville,” Cantwell insists,

lied in court to frame me, and had the cooperation of local authorities in this criminal behavior. The feds are our only hope for lawful remedy, and I intend to cooperate fully with any effort to bring these criminals to justice.

"I'm dobbing on my mates for the greater good guize, the greater good!!!"

Quote
We are not criminals. If the FBI searched every electronic device I have ever owned and pumped me full of top secret truth drugs and extracted every letter of knowledge I had about the Alt Right, I literally couldn’t give them a single fucking criminal. …

Fella, if Top Secret Truth Drugs existed and came into contact with your bloodstream they'd explode!

 
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: Kanzenkankaku on March 29, 2018, 02:54:59 am
"The Reds"

Just fucking "the reds"

I don't think I've ever heard that word used outside of like old cold war media or in that Hong Kong 97 game.
Title: Re: Alt-Right
Post by: Lana Reverse on March 29, 2018, 09:46:32 am
(https://media.giphy.com/media/qN7NZR3Q5R2mY/giphy.gif)