Hello, I am Jacob Harrison. On Fstdt.com, I promoted Roman Catholicism. I left the site when I had to take care of mental health problems but now I am better
So if I read this right, you completely changed your religion because the Catholic Church canonized Saint Jeanne d'Arc, and you're an England fanboy? Is that how it goes?
Uhh, have fun being Anglican, I guess. Shouldn't be hard to adjust, it's basically the same as Catholicism.
So if I read this right, you completely changed your religion because the Catholic Church canonized Saint Jeanne d'Arc, and you're an England fanboy? Is that how it goes?
Uhh, have fun being Anglican, I guess. Shouldn't be hard to adjust, it's basically the same as Catholicism.
Yes. And then I later said how my fellow Anglo Saxon brothers and sisters can help avenge our forefathers. The Union Jack on your avatar indicates that your British, so you should help with the plan.
So if I read this right, you completely changed your religion because the Catholic Church canonized Saint Jeanne d'Arc, and you're an England fanboy? Is that how it goes?
Uhh, have fun being Anglican, I guess. Shouldn't be hard to adjust, it's basically the same as Catholicism.
So if I read this right, you completely changed your religion because the Catholic Church canonized Saint Jeanne d'Arc, and you're an England fanboy? Is that how it goes?
Uhh, have fun being Anglican, I guess. Shouldn't be hard to adjust, it's basically the same as Catholicism.
Yes. And then I later said how my fellow Anglo Saxon brothers and sisters can help avenge our forefathers. The Union Jack on your avatar indicates that your British, so you should help with the plan.
Oh wait, I checked your profile and it says that your from Idaho. But as an American, you likely have English decent so you should help the plan to avenge our forefathers by spreading the word of my plan.
So if I read this right, you completely changed your religion because the Catholic Church canonized Saint Jeanne d'Arc, and you're an England fanboy? Is that how it goes?
Uhh, have fun being Anglican, I guess. Shouldn't be hard to adjust, it's basically the same as Catholicism.
Yes. And then I later said how my fellow Anglo Saxon brothers and sisters can help avenge our forefathers. The Union Jack on your avatar indicates that your British, so you should help with the plan.
Oh wait, I checked your profile and it says that your from Idaho. But as an American, you likely have English decent so you should help the plan to avenge our forefathers by spreading the word of my plan.
Does it still say I'm from Idaho? Wow, I gotta update that.
Are you just... not acknowledging the existence of nonwhite Americans? (Also, English isn't really more likely than any other western European nation, iirc.)
So if I read this right, you completely changed your religion because the Catholic Church canonized Saint Jeanne d'Arc, and you're an England fanboy? Is that how it goes?Bells, frocks and smells innit.
Uhh, have fun being Anglican, I guess. Shouldn't be hard to adjust, it's basically the same as Catholicism.
So if I read this right, you completely changed your religion because the Catholic Church canonized Saint Jeanne d'Arc, and you're an England fanboy? Is that how it goes?Bells, frocks and smells innit.
Uhh, have fun being Anglican, I guess. Shouldn't be hard to adjust, it's basically the same as Catholicism.
Hey Jake, here's some attention. There, do you feel validated?
Are you old enough to remember the life before the "sexual revolution?"
Your grandparents went into detail about their sex lives?
No wonder you're messed up!
Art, cut this mans bollocks off and put him out of his misery!
Your grandparents went into detail about their sex lives?
No wonder you're messed up!
Art, cut this mans bollocks off and put him out of his misery!
He agreed to do that, but I need to pay him $13,600 for him to travel from Australia to America. So as I said before, I need $13,600. Do you have that money? If you give me that plus extra, I can invest the extra cash into a bank account so that I can pay you back in interest.
Your grandparents went into detail about their sex lives?
No wonder you're messed up!
Art, cut this mans bollocks off and put him out of his misery!
He agreed to do that, but I need to pay him $13,600 for him to travel from Australia to America. So as I said before, I need $13,600. Do you have that money? If you give me that plus extra, I can invest the extra cash into a bank account so that I can pay you back in interest.
You know what I think investing with Origen wannabe self castrating Crypto-Anglicans has got to be the best investment decision of a life time. Fuck where do I sign up.
Your grandparents went into detail about their sex lives?
No wonder you're messed up!
Art, cut this mans bollocks off and put him out of his misery!
He agreed to do that, but I need to pay him $13,600 for him to travel from Australia to America. So as I said before, I need $13,600. Do you have that money? If you give me that plus extra, I can invest the extra cash into a bank account so that I can pay you back in interest.
You know what I think investing with Origen wannabe self castrating Crypto-Anglicans has got to be the best investment decision of a life time. Fuck where do I sign up.
Well first I will have to create a new secret bank account because I am only 19 and in college so my parents still have access to my bank account. Then you can invest. Not sure if I should use pay pal or go fund me. Which will get me enough money sooner?
Your grandparents went into detail about their sex lives?
No wonder you're messed up!
Art, cut this mans bollocks off and put him out of his misery!
He agreed to do that, but I need to pay him $13,600 for him to travel from Australia to America. So as I said before, I need $13,600. Do you have that money? If you give me that plus extra, I can invest the extra cash into a bank account so that I can pay you back in interest.
You know what I think investing with Origen wannabe self castrating Crypto-Anglicans has got to be the best investment decision of a life time. Fuck where do I sign up.
Well first I will have to create a new secret bank account because I am only 19 and in college so my parents still have access to my bank account. Then you can invest. Not sure if I should use pay pal or go fund me. Which will get me enough money sooner?
Well I think you should probably get in contact with my friend Prince Ndou of Nigeria. He is the Deputy Chief Minister for roads and infrastructure, the construction of a bridge has been cancelled but he still has the funding and is looking for a way to get the money out of Nigeria.
On your Harry Potter yammering among other things: no. Nobody has to edit their books for your Church or any church any more. This isn't the middle ages - this is 2018. We don't have to edit books for your religion, nor do we have to change evolutionary theory for it.
Nobody cares who was canonized or when. Get over it.
On your Harry Potter yammering among other things: no. Nobody has to edit their books for your Church or any church any more. This isn't the middle ages - this is 2018. We don't have to edit books for your religion, nor do we have to change evolutionary theory for it.
Nobody cares who was canonized or when. Get over it.
1. But isn’t it concerning that children who read Harry Potter won’t learn the difference between good magic and witchcraft since witchcraft is traditionally considered evil? It could cause teens to try to buy Ouija boards and use them to summon spirits which could lead to demonic attacks. Demonic attacks from ouija boards have been documented by numerous testimonies throughout history as well as YouTube videos.
2. It is not changing evolutionary theory as evolution is irrelevant to both atheism and religion. Only religious evolution deniers and certain atheists create the false dichotomy of atheism vs evolution denial. It is part of the bigger false dichotomy of religion vs science. You can be both religious and scientific as many scientists throughout history were religious.
3. You should care, because America has Anglo Saxon cultural heritage and therefore the pre 1688 English monarchs are our forefathers. You should therefore be outraged that the Jacobite successors have been deprived of their rightful thrones of England, Scotland, Ireland, and France.
On your Harry Potter yammering among other things: no. Nobody has to edit their books for your Church or any church any more. This isn't the middle ages - this is 2018. We don't have to edit books for your religion, nor do we have to change evolutionary theory for it.
Nobody cares who was canonized or when. Get over it.
1. But isn’t it concerning that children who read Harry Potter won’t learn the difference between good magic and witchcraft since witchcraft is traditionally considered evil? It could cause teens to try to buy Ouija boards and use them to summon spirits which could lead to demonic attacks. Demonic attacks from ouija boards have been documented by numerous testimonies throughout history as well as YouTube videos.
2. It is not changing evolutionary theory as evolution is irrelevant to both atheism and religion. Only religious evolution deniers and certain atheists create the false dichotomy of atheism vs evolution denial. It is part of the bigger false dichotomy of religion vs science. You can be both religious and scientific as many scientists throughout history were religious.
3. You should care, because America has Anglo Saxon cultural heritage and therefore the pre 1688 English monarchs are our forefathers. You should therefore be outraged that the Jacobite successors have been deprived of their rightful thrones of England, Scotland, Ireland, and France.
So uh, correct me if I'm wrong, history isn't my strong suit, but wasn't America founded by a rebellion against the British monarchy
1. But isn’t it concerning that children who read Harry Potter won’t learn the difference between good magic and witchcraft since witchcraft is traditionally considered evil? It could cause teens to try to play with the occult such as buying Ouija boards and use them to summon spirits which could lead to demonic attacks. Demonic attacks from ouija boards have been documented by numerous testimonies throughout history as well as YouTube videos.No. No, it isn't. This is of course completely unrelated to the fact that it's all make believe. Harry Potter, oija boards, demons, Christianity and magic of all varieties. What's more concerning is the sheer number of grown ass adults who take magic seriously.
The Stuarts tended toward personal rule; afterward, monarchs tended to defer to Parliament. If any monarchs were being tyrannical, it's the former.
Parliament, being a body representative of the governed, had every right to determine who and under what conditions the de jure chief executive would be. Would you have preferred a nice long bloody war?
The American Revolution had nothing to do with who the monarch was. It was a matter of principle, that nobody should be taxed without a voice in the decision to levy that tax (but tell that to DC...), and later American envoys to the United Kingdom stated that had the colonies been given fair representation in the Commons and the Lords, they would not have rebelled. It was the British assertion of their supposed right to legislate for their colonies without those same colonies having any voice in the decision that sparked the rebellion.
I am a fan of monarchy, and I prefer it to (almost) any form of republic, but I favour parliamentary constitutional monarchy, in which Parliament exercises the legislative power and determines through the confidence mechanism who shall exercise, de facto, the executive power, and the monarch, while still the de jure chief executive, actually wields only the reserve powers and then only at direst need.
I do not give half a crap about your traditions or who is king or queen or whatever is going on about the church.
I am sure I can find YouTube videos discussing proof of lizard people. Do I believe them? Ssscertainly not!
I do not care about what some backwards morons did or what heritage people have. It is not important to who anyone really is what guy ruled in 1638 or whatever.
Some geezer can rant about it, but the fact is we young people these days want to fuck, lift, look great, and hang out with other handsome and beautiful people. So take your talk of Gackobites and shove it so far up your ass you digest it again.
And again I can show you videos demonstrating what seems like proof to the video maker of lizard people. Does this make them remotely true? No.
And again - I do not care what wankers showed up, or what the jacrobites are. You don't own patriotism and you certainly can't own how people live their lives.
The most I can tell you now is just go try and find people to fuck - women, men and in any combination thereof to date your loins. You don't need some Anglo heritage bullshit. Whatever your folks or whatever told you, its stupid and wrong.
1. I know that many videos are bullshit and have CGI. I am talking about eyewitness testimonies, and footage of people getting attacked. In some of them, they are even on security cameras.
2. I don’t own patriotism but our nation in which we are citizens of does.
3. How is what my family taught me stupid? I don’t see how you could argue that fucking around with whoever is better than a committed loving romantic relationship. And fucking around with multiple partners also gives you AIDS.
Besides, I said that I am not sexual enough to fuck because I get sexually turned on not by the thought of a women’s vagina butcby the thought of me masterbating to a female hence my nightmares. Do you know how I can cure my fetish?
The Stuart’s were not tyrannical. They had near absolute power, but they did what was in the best interests of their country. Cromwell was the real tyrant. He established a fanatical puritanical regime outlawing so many things and commiting horrific atrocities against the Irish. The English resented his regime so much that they cheered the return of Charles II.Yes, Cromwell was a dick but coming from an anti sexual revolution, anti feminist guy whose only acceptable variant of sexual activity is fapping furiously before reluctantly sticking his end into a certified virgin's vagina is signalling his opposition to...fanatical puritanism?
And Parliament had no right to overthrow King James II because at that time, the King’s Power legally was over Parliament and King James II didn’t do anything bad. Parliament was against him because he was a Roman Catholic(before Joan of Arc was canonized) and allowed tolerance of Protestant sects that were not Anglican. What was tyrannical about that?
1) And a lot of those videos you talk about are people being tortured by their folks - who are convinced those people have demons in them. People've been murdered for "seeming demon possessed" by their own folks.
2) And being that heritage is only ever brought up by alt-right shitweasels and others of their sort, I see no reason to take any sort of pride in heritage. My dad said it best "people who are proud of their heritage have nothing else to be proud of."
3) Because as we're seeing now, people have decided they don't WANT to be committed to one person. And fucking around only gives you AIDS if you're not careful.
Uh, just try unwinding and having some sex, man. You won't know till you go out and try.
The Stuart’s were not tyrannical. They had near absolute power, but they did what was in the best interests of their country. Cromwell was the real tyrant. He established a fanatical puritanical regime outlawing so many things and commiting horrific atrocities against the Irish. The English resented his regime so much that they cheered the return of Charles II.Yes, Cromwell was a dick but coming from an anti sexual revolution, anti feminist guy whose only acceptable variant of sexual activity is fapping furiously before reluctantly sticking his end into a certified virgin's vagina is signalling his opposition to...fanatical puritanism?
And Parliament had no right to overthrow King James II because at that time, the King’s Power legally was over Parliament and King James II didn’t do anything bad. Parliament was against him because he was a Roman Catholic(before Joan of Arc was canonized) and allowed tolerance of Protestant sects that were not Anglican. What was tyrannical about that?
Come again?
Yes, yes the pun was intentional, and terrible, for that alone I'm truly sorry!
The Stuart’s were not tyrannical. They had near absolute power, but they did what was in the best interests of their country. Cromwell was the real tyrant. He established a fanatical puritanical regime outlawing so many things and commiting horrific atrocities against the Irish. The English resented his regime so much that they cheered the return of Charles II.Yes, Cromwell was a dick but coming from an anti sexual revolution, anti feminist guy whose only acceptable variant of sexual activity is fapping furiously before reluctantly sticking his end into a certified virgin's vagina is signalling his opposition to...fanatical puritanism?
And Parliament had no right to overthrow King James II because at that time, the King’s Power legally was over Parliament and King James II didn’t do anything bad. Parliament was against him because he was a Roman Catholic(before Joan of Arc was canonized) and allowed tolerance of Protestant sects that were not Anglican. What was tyrannical about that?
Come again?
Yes, yes the pun was intentional, and terrible, for that alone I'm truly sorry!
I am not as extreme as the fanatical Puritan heretics. My views on sex reflect those of conservative Anglicans. And I am not anti feminist, because I believe that women should have equal rights and not have to deal with perverts like you guys objectifying them and putting them in uncomfortable situations. And the Civil Rights Act already makes discriminating against women in the workplace and not giving them equal pay illegal. And I wish I could be more naturally attracted to a women’s vagina but I can’t help that I have such a fetish to the thought of masterbation. No matter how much I look at images of vagina’s on the internet, I am not turned on by them.
I am a victim of the sexual revolution which has caused a rise in degenerate paraphilias. My fapping fetish however is not as bad as other creepy perverted fetishes that people have. My fetish involves thinking of MYSELF fapping while other people’s fetishes involve bizzare and disgusting fantasies about a woman.
And Parliament had no right to overthrow King James II because at that time, the King’s Power legally was over Parliament and King James II didn’t do anything bad. Parliament was against him because he was a Roman Catholic(before Joan of Arc was canonized) and allowed tolerance of Protestant sects that were not Anglican. What was tyrannical about that?
Yup, back in the day when young virgins were traded as chattel for real estate it was much more feministy.
Uh huh.
And you really don't need to go into any more detail about your fapping, really. We're good. Thanks.
And Parliament had no right to overthrow King James II because at that time, the King’s Power legally was over Parliament and King James II didn’t do anything bad. Parliament was against him because he was a Roman Catholic(before Joan of Arc was canonized) and allowed tolerance of Protestant sects that were not Anglican. What was tyrannical about that?
Except that when a single individual (or group thereof--don't think I think all that highly of the House of Lords), unaccountable to the governed, has power over those who are so accountable, that creates a fundamentally unfair and untenable situation that would almost certainly have eventually exploded into civil war had it not been for the Glorious Revolution. Parliament had every moral right to assert its proper authority, as the representatives of the people, over the unelected monarch.
I ask again: would you have preferred a bloody war?
The Stuart’s were not tyrannical. They had near absolute power, but they did what was in the best interests of their country. Cromwell was the real tyrant. He established a fanatical puritanical regime outlawing so many things and commiting horrific atrocities against the Irish. The English resented his regime so much that they cheered the return of Charles II.Yes, Cromwell was a dick but coming from an anti sexual revolution, anti feminist guy whose only acceptable variant of sexual activity is fapping furiously before reluctantly sticking his end into a certified virgin's vagina is signalling his opposition to...fanatical puritanism?
And Parliament had no right to overthrow King James II because at that time, the King’s Power legally was over Parliament and King James II didn’t do anything bad. Parliament was against him because he was a Roman Catholic(before Joan of Arc was canonized) and allowed tolerance of Protestant sects that were not Anglican. What was tyrannical about that?
Come again?
Yes, yes the pun was intentional, and terrible, for that alone I'm truly sorry!
I am not as extreme as the fanatical Puritan heretics. My views on sex reflect those of conservative Anglicans. And I am not anti feminist, because I believe that women should have equal rights and not have to deal with perverts like you guys objectifying them and putting them in uncomfortable situations. And the Civil Rights Act already makes discriminating against women in the workplace and not giving them equal pay illegal. And I wish I could be more naturally attracted to a women’s vagina but I can’t help that I have such a fetish to the thought of masterbation. No matter how much I look at images of vagina’s on the internet, I am not turned on by them.
I am a victim of the sexual revolution which has caused a rise in degenerate paraphilias. My fapping fetish however is not as bad as other creepy perverted fetishes that people have. My fetish involves thinking of MYSELF fapping while other people’s fetishes involve bizzare and disgusting fantasies about a woman.
So you are not attracted to vaginas but to the idea of a thick hard cock being slowly stroked. What about one being stroked next to yours? ...gets you going right?
There is no such thing as demon possession - get that into your thick skull. There's mental illness and psycho religious nuts insisting someone's mental illness is all demons.
Those people are all great, sure - but I don't take pride in just their existence. As I said before, people who are entirely proud of their heritage have nothing else to be proud of. And if you're so fucking stupid you don't get the causes and politics of the parties flipped over the years, you fail history even harder man. So, to give you a final answer, no, I am not proud of my heritage. Heritage is nothing but dumbasses wanking over how great their great great great granduncle Cletus was for doing some dumbass thing in the 1800s or some shit like that.
And so says you and your kid-fucking priests on number 3. Of course the religious nuts do not want people out having fun, so they make shit up like that. "Hurr, you need to be in a loving relationship long term to be happy. CUZ JAYSUS!"
And Parliament had no right to overthrow King James II because at that time, the King’s Power legally was over Parliament and King James II didn’t do anything bad. Parliament was against him because he was a Roman Catholic(before Joan of Arc was canonized) and allowed tolerance of Protestant sects that were not Anglican. What was tyrannical about that?
Except that when a single individual (or group thereof--don't think I think all that highly of the House of Lords), unaccountable to the governed, has power over those who are so accountable, that creates a fundamentally unfair and untenable situation that would almost certainly have eventually exploded into civil war had it not been for the Glorious Revolution. Parliament had every moral right to assert its proper authority, as the representatives of the people, over the unelected monarch.
I ask again: would you have preferred a bloody war?
I would not prefer a bloody war. I would prefer King James II bringing order and stability to England by enforcing the law which he was doing. Of course a monarch should obey a countries laws and not act arbitrarily, but the Magna Carta already restrained the monarch from doing that.
Besides, how was King James II abusing his power by protecting the rights of religious minorities in his Kingdoms. That is something you should answer.
And Parliament had no right to overthrow King James II because at that time, the King’s Power legally was over Parliament and King James II didn’t do anything bad. Parliament was against him because he was a Roman Catholic(before Joan of Arc was canonized) and allowed tolerance of Protestant sects that were not Anglican. What was tyrannical about that?
Except that when a single individual (or group thereof--don't think I think all that highly of the House of Lords), unaccountable to the governed, has power over those who are so accountable, that creates a fundamentally unfair and untenable situation that would almost certainly have eventually exploded into civil war had it not been for the Glorious Revolution. Parliament had every moral right to assert its proper authority, as the representatives of the people, over the unelected monarch.
I ask again: would you have preferred a bloody war?
I would not prefer a bloody war. I would prefer King James II bringing order and stability to England by enforcing the law which he was doing. Of course a monarch should obey a countries laws and not act arbitrarily, but the Magna Carta already restrained the monarch from doing that.
Besides, how was King James II abusing his power by protecting the rights of religious minorities in his Kingdoms. That is something you should answer.
Because using his power in a manner opposed to the wishes of the governed is abusing his power, whatever the effects.
And Parliament had no right to overthrow King James II because at that time, the King’s Power legally was over Parliament and King James II didn’t do anything bad. Parliament was against him because he was a Roman Catholic(before Joan of Arc was canonized) and allowed tolerance of Protestant sects that were not Anglican. What was tyrannical about that?
Except that when a single individual (or group thereof--don't think I think all that highly of the House of Lords), unaccountable to the governed, has power over those who are so accountable, that creates a fundamentally unfair and untenable situation that would almost certainly have eventually exploded into civil war had it not been for the Glorious Revolution. Parliament had every moral right to assert its proper authority, as the representatives of the people, over the unelected monarch.
I ask again: would you have preferred a bloody war?
I would not prefer a bloody war. I would prefer King James II bringing order and stability to England by enforcing the law which he was doing. Of course a monarch should obey a countries laws and not act arbitrarily, but the Magna Carta already restrained the monarch from doing that.
Besides, how was King James II abusing his power by protecting the rights of religious minorities in his Kingdoms. That is something you should answer.
Because using his power in a manner opposed to the wishes of the governed is abusing his power, whatever the effects.
So your a fan of tyranny of the majority rather than a monarch who protected the rights of minorities.
And Parliament had no right to overthrow King James II because at that time, the King’s Power legally was over Parliament and King James II didn’t do anything bad. Parliament was against him because he was a Roman Catholic(before Joan of Arc was canonized) and allowed tolerance of Protestant sects that were not Anglican. What was tyrannical about that?
Except that when a single individual (or group thereof--don't think I think all that highly of the House of Lords), unaccountable to the governed, has power over those who are so accountable, that creates a fundamentally unfair and untenable situation that would almost certainly have eventually exploded into civil war had it not been for the Glorious Revolution. Parliament had every moral right to assert its proper authority, as the representatives of the people, over the unelected monarch.
I ask again: would you have preferred a bloody war?
I would not prefer a bloody war. I would prefer King James II bringing order and stability to England by enforcing the law which he was doing. Of course a monarch should obey a countries laws and not act arbitrarily, but the Magna Carta already restrained the monarch from doing that.
Besides, how was King James II abusing his power by protecting the rights of religious minorities in his Kingdoms. That is something you should answer.
Because using his power in a manner opposed to the wishes of the governed is abusing his power, whatever the effects.
So your a fan of tyranny of the majority rather than a monarch who protected the rights of minorities.
I'm not a fan of the UK's system insofar as it has no entrenched protections for rights. But I cannot condone the monarch's unilateral use of power just because I like the effect it happened to have in this instance.
And Parliament had no right to overthrow King James II because at that time, the King’s Power legally was over Parliament and King James II didn’t do anything bad. Parliament was against him because he was a Roman Catholic(before Joan of Arc was canonized) and allowed tolerance of Protestant sects that were not Anglican. What was tyrannical about that?
Except that when a single individual (or group thereof--don't think I think all that highly of the House of Lords), unaccountable to the governed, has power over those who are so accountable, that creates a fundamentally unfair and untenable situation that would almost certainly have eventually exploded into civil war had it not been for the Glorious Revolution. Parliament had every moral right to assert its proper authority, as the representatives of the people, over the unelected monarch.
I ask again: would you have preferred a bloody war?
I would not prefer a bloody war. I would prefer King James II bringing order and stability to England by enforcing the law which he was doing. Of course a monarch should obey a countries laws and not act arbitrarily, but the Magna Carta already restrained the monarch from doing that.
Besides, how was King James II abusing his power by protecting the rights of religious minorities in his Kingdoms. That is something you should answer.
Because using his power in a manner opposed to the wishes of the governed is abusing his power, whatever the effects.
So your a fan of tyranny of the majority rather than a monarch who protected the rights of minorities.
I'm not a fan of the UK's system insofar as it has no entrenched protections for rights. But I cannot condone the monarch's unilateral use of power just because I like the effect it happened to have in this instance.
So you believe that minorities should deal with having their rights sacrificed for the ideal of democracy?
And Parliament had no right to overthrow King James II because at that time, the King’s Power legally was over Parliament and King James II didn’t do anything bad. Parliament was against him because he was a Roman Catholic(before Joan of Arc was canonized) and allowed tolerance of Protestant sects that were not Anglican. What was tyrannical about that?
Except that when a single individual (or group thereof--don't think I think all that highly of the House of Lords), unaccountable to the governed, has power over those who are so accountable, that creates a fundamentally unfair and untenable situation that would almost certainly have eventually exploded into civil war had it not been for the Glorious Revolution. Parliament had every moral right to assert its proper authority, as the representatives of the people, over the unelected monarch.
I ask again: would you have preferred a bloody war?
I would not prefer a bloody war. I would prefer King James II bringing order and stability to England by enforcing the law which he was doing. Of course a monarch should obey a countries laws and not act arbitrarily, but the Magna Carta already restrained the monarch from doing that.
Besides, how was King James II abusing his power by protecting the rights of religious minorities in his Kingdoms. That is something you should answer.
Because using his power in a manner opposed to the wishes of the governed is abusing his power, whatever the effects.
So your a fan of tyranny of the majority rather than a monarch who protected the rights of minorities.
I'm not a fan of the UK's system insofar as it has no entrenched protections for rights. But I cannot condone the monarch's unilateral use of power just because I like the effect it happened to have in this instance.
So you believe that minorities should deal with having their rights sacrificed for the ideal of democracy?
No, I think certain matters should be entrenched and beyond the reach of any simple majority to change.
I don't think any of the likely solutions (personal rule, Parliamentary rule, civil war) were particularly good, but of them I would choose the second as the least bad option.
So find yourself a virgin gal into eccentric ex Catholics that hate their ladybits while you fap off to the Levis catalogue. Simples.
Yup, back in the day when young virgins were traded as chattel for real estate it was much more feministy.
Uh huh.
And you really don't need to go into any more detail about your fapping, really. We're good. Thanks.
Sex trafficking happens a lot more after the sexual revolution that before it. Teaching men to repress their sexual thoughts is more respectful to women because it is morally wrong to fap to a woman if she doesn’t want you to do so.
So find yourself a virgin gal into eccentric ex Catholics that hate their ladybits while you fap off to the Levis catalogue. Simples.
I assume he can dry hump the hell out of her. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nTT43Kn-tNM
Yup, back in the day when young virgins were traded as chattel for real estate it was much more feministy.
Uh huh.
And you really don't need to go into any more detail about your fapping, really. We're good. Thanks.
Sex trafficking happens a lot more after the sexual revolution that before it. Teaching men to repress their sexual thoughts is more respectful to women because it is morally wrong to fap to a woman if she doesn’t want you to do so.
I would love to know the statistics of that. But then again I read somewhere that there are more people enslaved now than there were during the trans-atlantic slave trade.
So find yourself a virgin gal into eccentric ex Catholics that hate their ladybits while you fap off to the Levis catalogue. Simples.
I assume he can dry hump the hell out of her. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nTT43Kn-tNM
BUT I COULD NOT MAKE BABIES WHEN DRY HUMPING A WIFE! Are you even trying to help cure me or are you just trolling?
So find yourself a virgin gal into eccentric ex Catholics that hate their ladybits while you fap off to the Levis catalogue. Simples.
I assume he can dry hump the hell out of her. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nTT43Kn-tNM
BUT I COULD NOT MAKE BABIES WHEN DRY HUMPING A WIFE! Are you even trying to help cure me or are you just trolling?
No more than you cracker
How is Harvey Weinstein or the metoo movement related to sex-trafficking?
And proof of what?
Just make sure your virgin agrees to artificial insemination.So find yourself a virgin gal into eccentric ex Catholics that hate their ladybits while you fap off to the Levis catalogue. Simples.
I assume he can dry hump the hell out of her. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nTT43Kn-tNM
BUT I COULD NOT MAKE BABIES WHEN DRY HUMPING A WIFE! Are you even trying to help cure me or are you just trolling?
So find yourself a virgin gal into eccentric ex Catholics that hate their ladybits while you fap off to the Levis catalogue. Simples.
I assume he can dry hump the hell out of her. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nTT43Kn-tNM
BUT I COULD NOT MAKE BABIES WHEN DRY HUMPING A WIFE! Are you even trying to help cure me or are you just trolling?
No more than you cracker
I am not trying to troll. It is just that I am morally disgusted with how you perverted incels objectify and treat women so I have every right to cast judgement on you, because I avoid masterbation making me more respectful of women and morally superior to you. And I really wish I was cured of my clothing fetish, and if I can’t then I must get rid of my sexual hormones so I get rid of my degenerate temptations to have fantasies about dry humping. I want to be a normal heterosexual.
How is Harvey Weinstein or the metoo movement related to sex-trafficking?
And proof of what?
It proves that the sexual revolution teaches men to objectify women which causes them to not have moral problems with groping or exploiting women.
So find yourself a virgin gal into eccentric ex Catholics that hate their ladybits while you fap off to the Levis catalogue. Simples.
I assume he can dry hump the hell out of her. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nTT43Kn-tNM
BUT I COULD NOT MAKE BABIES WHEN DRY HUMPING A WIFE! Are you even trying to help cure me or are you just trolling?
No more than you cracker
I am not trying to troll. It is just that I am morally disgusted with how you perverted incels objectify and treat women so I have every right to cast judgement on you, because I avoid masterbation making me more respectful of women and morally superior to you. And I really wish I was cured of my clothing fetish, and if I can’t then I must get rid of my sexual hormones so I get rid of my degenerate temptations to have fantasies about dry humping. I want to be a normal heterosexual.
Which incels? I'm not celibate cracker.
Isn't this guy what the incels call a volcel, "voluntary celibate?" His virgin fetish fits in nicely with inceldom though.
Also, how were the ol' rail the virgin you bought with your dowry days not sex trafficking? You do the lassies father a solid and he trafficks his offspring to you to have sexytimes with!
Isn't this guy what the incels call a volcel, "voluntary celibate?" His virgin fetish fits in nicely with inceldom though.
Also, how were the ol' rail the virgin you bought with your dowry days not sex trafficking? You do the lassies father a solid and he trafficks his offspring to you to have sexytimes with!
Why are you so interested in my masturbating?
You have a really romantic view of things you have absolutely no lived experience of.
How would you know? You haven't had either!You have a really romantic view of things you have absolutely no lived experience of.
Because I have romantic thoughts on a future ideal wife. There is a difference between romantic love, and sexual sensation. I just want to be romantic in a respectful non objectifying manner.
If you are voluntarily celibate then your first hand experience of just how awesome and romantic it ia to reluctantly masturbate in order to impregnate your jean-jacket wearing virgin bride is entirely nil.
How would you know? You haven't had either!You have a really romantic view of things you have absolutely no lived experience of.
Because I have romantic thoughts on a future ideal wife. There is a difference between romantic love, and sexual sensation. I just want to be romantic in a respectful non objectifying manner.
Mind you, you haven't lived in a monarchy or a society where people still trade kids like Pokemon and that never stopped you waxing lyrical about that!
Just a heads up, "normal" sex between men and women often involves touching vaginas at some point!
You still haven’t addressed my point on how there are volcel women who do not want you to masterbate to them. And another point, is that if the woman is a not a virgin, then why should I trust that she is not going to cheat on me?Oh that point, your speculation on our masturbation habits comes from the same expanse of fuck all as your first hand knowledge of romantic vs non romantic sex.
’You still haven’t addressed my point on how there are volcel women who do not want you to masterbate to them. And another point, is that if the woman is a not a virgin, then why should I trust that she is not going to cheat on me?Oh that point, your speculation on our masturbation habits comes from the same expanse of fuck all as your first hand knowledge of romantic vs non romantic sex.
Also your correlation between virginity and fidelity is similarly ungrounded in anything substantial.
I'm not a shrink, if you want help with your sex fetish problems go to one. Preferably with a receptive attitude towards evidence based advice or the treatment won't work!
Is permanently losing a major organ better than having a wank? Ponders.
No, no it's not! But that's subjective, you want a castration. Go right ahead. You'd complain less about fapping because you couldn't.
But y'know all this reproduction stuff you wanna do with your denim concubine depends on the same spunk you're spilling on the ground, yeah?
Is permanently losing a major organ better than having a wank? Ponders.
No, no it's not! But that's subjective, you want a castration. Go right ahead. You'd complain less about fapping because you couldn't.
But y'know all this reproduction stuff you wanna do with your denim concubine depends on the same spunk you're spilling on the ground, yeah?
Being turned on by a cute babe in tight jeans is fine and perfectly normal, relax.Is permanently losing a major organ better than having a wank? Ponders.
No, no it's not! But that's subjective, you want a castration. Go right ahead. You'd complain less about fapping because you couldn't.
But y'know all this reproduction stuff you wanna do with your denim concubine depends on the same spunk you're spilling on the ground, yeah?Is permanently losing a major organ better than having a wank? Ponders.
No, no it's not! But that's subjective, you want a castration. Go right ahead. You'd complain less about fapping because you couldn't.
But y'know all this reproduction stuff you wanna do with your denim concubine depends on the same spunk you're spilling on the ground, yeah?
1. But don’t you think that I deserve a castration for having such degenerate temptations? Are you telling me to stay degenerate
2. Evidence that I am a victim of the sexual revolution is my past experience since my childhood that made me turned on by women wearing jeans. Instead of treating their jeans as simple clothes like the sane volcel females did, they used their jeans to flaunt their sexuality. For example, many shake their asses while wearing jeans. I couldn’t help but get a fucking erection as I am typing this. But I restrained my arms from touching my penis because I know better than to give in to perversion. If you ever read Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde you’ll get the idea. Dr. Jekyll’s mistake was allowing Hyde to flourish instead of taking responsibility to repress it.
3. I feel ashamed of my degenerate temptations so while I ideally would like to reproduce in a normal way, I would feel like castrating myself is a good form of penance and will lessen the debt of my sins. When artificial wombs are available for humans, I could create clone children by taking a swab of DNA from my cheek and inserting it into the artificial womb to create a bunch of clone children. I will raise them to be greater than me because they won’t have the degenerate tendencies. Nobody will have the legal or moral right to stop me.
Why are you so interested in my masturbating?
Because you don’t realize how it is perverted and disrespectful to masterbate to a women who does not know that you are masterbating to her.
Being turned on by a cute babe in tight jeans is fine and perfectly normal, relax.Is permanently losing a major organ better than having a wank? Ponders.
No, no it's not! But that's subjective, you want a castration. Go right ahead. You'd complain less about fapping because you couldn't.
But y'know all this reproduction stuff you wanna do with your denim concubine depends on the same spunk you're spilling on the ground, yeah?Is permanently losing a major organ better than having a wank? Ponders.
No, no it's not! But that's subjective, you want a castration. Go right ahead. You'd complain less about fapping because you couldn't.
But y'know all this reproduction stuff you wanna do with your denim concubine depends on the same spunk you're spilling on the ground, yeah?
1. But don’t you think that I deserve a castration for having such degenerate temptations? Are you telling me to stay degenerate
2. Evidence that I am a victim of the sexual revolution is my past experience since my childhood that made me turned on by women wearing jeans. Instead of treating their jeans as simple clothes like the sane volcel females did, they used their jeans to flaunt their sexuality. For example, many shake their asses while wearing jeans. I couldn’t help but get a fucking erection as I am typing this. But I restrained my arms from touching my penis because I know better than to give in to perversion. If you ever read Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde you’ll get the idea. Dr. Jekyll’s mistake was allowing Hyde to flourish instead of taking responsibility to repress it.
3. I feel ashamed of my degenerate temptations so while I ideally would like to reproduce in a normal way, I would feel like castrating myself is a good form of penance and will lessen the debt of my sins. When artificial wombs are available for humans, I could create clone children by taking a swab of DNA from my cheek and inserting it into the artificial womb to create a bunch of clone children. I will raise them to be greater than me because they won’t have the degenerate tendencies. Nobody will have the legal or moral right to stop me.
"Degenerate" is Nazi code for "not meeting impossible standards" chill, have a wank FFS. Maybe even meet some consenting lass wearing sexy jeans and have sexytimes. You're having a fuss over nothing!
"Modest" Jeans-is that a burqa made of denim?
Also, fetishes are pretty harmless. So long as it doesn't involve kids, the unwilling or the dead I couldn't give a toss.
Necrophilia isn't as morally wrong as rape or child molesting but it's terrible taste at your grannies wake-however awesone she told ypu sex was back in the day!
If you want to beat yourself up over arbitrary standards designed by and for folks who aren't you-go nuts. It's your call.
Why are you so interested in my masturbating?
Because you don’t realize how it is perverted and disrespectful to masterbate to a women who does not know that you are masterbating to her.
I think you'll find the volcel women are masturbating to me cracker.
Why are you so interested in my masturbating?
Because you don’t realize how it is perverted and disrespectful to masterbate to a women who does not know that you are masterbating to her.
I think you'll find the volcel women are masturbating to me cracker.
Why do you assume that no volcel women exist.
so you masturbate to women's tears as they cry to the concept of me withdrawing my incredible sexuality from their availability.
Why are you so interested in my masturbating?
Because you don’t realize how it is perverted and disrespectful to masterbate to a women who does not know that you are masterbating to her.
I think you'll find the volcel women are masturbating to me cracker.
Why do you assume that no volcel women exist.
why do you not accept the fact that volcel women all masturbate while imagining me.
Necrophilia is not as morally wrong but that does not make it mortally ok.
Necrophilia is not as morally wrong but that does not make it mortally ok.
As opposed to necrophiles finding mortality OK?
so you masturbate to women's tears as they cry to the concept of me withdrawing my incredible sexuality from their availability.But of course.
so you masturbate to women's tears as they cry to the concept of me withdrawing my incredible sexuality from their availability.But of course.
so you masturbate to women's tears as they cry to the concept of me withdrawing my incredible sexuality from their availability.But of course.
So you didn’t even read my response to that.
so you masturbate to women's tears as they cry to the concept of me withdrawing my incredible sexuality from their availability.But of course.
So you didn’t even read my response to that.
Oh, I did. However, my meat beating habits shall remain unchanged.
Why are you so interested in my masturbating?
Because you don’t realize how it is perverted and disrespectful to masterbate to a women who does not know that you are masterbating to her.
I think you'll find the volcel women are masturbating to me cracker.
Why do you assume that no volcel women exist.
why do you not accept the fact that volcel women all masturbate while imagining me.
Why do you assume that all of them do that?
so you masturbate to women's tears as they cry to the concept of me withdrawing my incredible sexuality from their availability.
I don’t masterbate to women’s tears. I just think that women and men who objectify me deserve punishment for objectifying me. I am telling you that it is a sign of maturity and machoism to not give into perverted temptations and focuss on doing better more productive things such as getting a job, giving to charity, or doing other creative things. I would behave the same way if I was asexual. As I keep saying, what if a particular women DOES NOT WANT YOU TO MASTERBATE TO HER! You should then respect her and stop doing it! God is angry at you for not respecting volcels. However since you have not done any sin serious enough to be beyond redemption, God still loves you and wants you to change your ways. Many girls at my college talk about perverted men including a 19 year old Christian mother who was talking about a man who flirted with her while she was taking care of her baby.
so you masturbate to women's tears as they cry to the concept of me withdrawing my incredible sexuality from their availability.
I don’t masterbate to women’s tears. I just think that women and men who objectify me deserve punishment for objectifying me. I am telling you that it is a sign of maturity and machoism to not give into perverted temptations and focuss on doing better more productive things such as getting a job, giving to charity, or doing other creative things. I would behave the same way if I was asexual. As I keep saying, what if a particular women DOES NOT WANT YOU TO MASTERBATE TO HER! You should then respect her and stop doing it! God is angry at you for not respecting volcels. However since you have not done any sin serious enough to be beyond redemption, God still loves you and wants you to change your ways. Many girls at my college talk about perverted men including a 19 year old Christian mother who was talking about a man who flirted with her while she was taking care of her baby.
We weren't talking to you cracker. This is between me Art, Art's meat and women getting upset when I deny them a taste of hot steamy squirrel. But I think it's really nice that you go around telling women how you would like to masturbate to them and asking if that's ok. I mean they might be non-celibate or even promiscuous yet not want a spaced out Crypto-Anglican with a masturbation and castration fetish telling them about how he wants to blow a wad onto their modest, yet provocative, blue jeans
so you masturbate to women's tears as they cry to the concept of me withdrawing my incredible sexuality from their availability.But of course.
So you didn’t even read my response to that.
Oh, I did. However, my meat beating habits shall remain unchanged.
Wow. So even though many women talk about perverted creepy men, you still won’t change your ways. So you think it is ok to walk up to a woman and say “Hey nice boobs” or “nice ass,” even if they don’t want you to do that? Why do you think that Homer Simpson is a man of virtue? The show the Simpsons is supposed to make fun of depraved people. I feel that like women, I have a right to tell perverts to stop objectifying me.
so you masturbate to women's tears as they cry to the concept of me withdrawing my incredible sexuality from their availability.But of course.
So you didn’t even read my response to that.
Oh, I did. However, my meat beating habits shall remain unchanged.
Wow. So even though many women talk about perverted creepy men, you still won’t change your ways. So you think it is ok to walk up to a woman and say “Hey nice boobs” or “nice ass,” even if they don’t want you to do that? Why do you think that Homer Simpson is a man of virtue? The show the Simpsons is supposed to make fun of depraved people. I feel that like women, I have a right to tell perverts to stop objectifying me.
Hey, you watch yourself. I'll not have you talking shit about Homer Simpson, the greatest ever example of masculinity, strength and intellect in human history. A man whose influence of culture all around the world has continued through the generations to this very day. Knock that shit off right now, or I swear to Satan I will not come over there and cut your balls off while dressed as a clown.
so you masturbate to women's tears as they cry to the concept of me withdrawing my incredible sexuality from their availability.But of course.
So you didn’t even read my response to that.
Oh, I did. However, my meat beating habits shall remain unchanged.
Wow. So even though many women talk about perverted creepy men, you still won’t change your ways. So you think it is ok to walk up to a woman and say “Hey nice boobs” or “nice ass,” even if they don’t want you to do that? Why do you think that Homer Simpson is a man of virtue? The show the Simpsons is supposed to make fun of depraved people. I feel that like women, I have a right to tell perverts to stop objectifying me.
Hey, you watch yourself. I'll not have you talking shit about Homer Simpson, the greatest ever example of masculinity, strength and intellect in human history. A man whose influence of culture all around the world has continued through the generations to this very day. Knock that shit off right now, or I swear to Satan I will not come over there and cut your balls off while dressed as a clown.
Oh. I thought that making you angry would give you more incentive to attack me.
so you masturbate to women's tears as they cry to the concept of me withdrawing my incredible sexuality from their availability.But of course.
So you didn’t even read my response to that.
Oh, I did. However, my meat beating habits shall remain unchanged.
Wow. So even though many women talk about perverted creepy men, you still won’t change your ways. So you think it is ok to walk up to a woman and say “Hey nice boobs” or “nice ass,” even if they don’t want you to do that? Why do you think that Homer Simpson is a man of virtue? The show the Simpsons is supposed to make fun of depraved people. I feel that like women, I have a right to tell perverts to stop objectifying me.
Hey, you watch yourself. I'll not have you talking shit about Homer Simpson, the greatest ever example of masculinity, strength and intellect in human history. A man whose influence of culture all around the world has continued through the generations to this very day. Knock that shit off right now, or I swear to Satan I will not come over there and cut your balls off while dressed as a clown.
Oh. I thought that making you angry would give you more incentive to attack me.
No, if you piss me off, I'll break into your room and replace your wallpaper with the women's section of the Levis catalogue. See, I know your weaknesses.
But wouldn’t me getting mutilated be a more severe punishment?
But wouldn’t me getting mutilated be a more severe punishment?
Would it? Would it really?
...it is better if I masterbate in private...
So you don't want me to chop your man berries off? You're breaking my heart, man, you're breaking my heart.
Look I am only prepared to accept your apology if you stop thinking about me when you masturbate cracker.
...it is better if I masterbate in private...
Dude, you've been publicly wanking all over this forum about your wicked wenches in Dad jeans since you got here!
Here ya go, bust (another) nut. Our May calendar girl features modest-yet-practical Bisley drill pants, sensible construction shoes and shirt with a very modest reinforced plastic hat.
(https://ssli.ebayimg.com/images/g/wG8AAOSw8zNa-M5j/s-l640.jpg)
Is that King Charlie's scepter in your hand or are you just pleased to see us, Jackie?
Why are you so interested in my masturbating?
Because you don’t realize how it is perverted and disrespectful to masterbate to a women who does not know that you are masterbating to her.
I think you'll find the volcel women are masturbating to me cracker.
Why do you assume that no volcel women exist.
why do you not accept the fact that volcel women all masturbate while imagining me.
Why do you assume that all of them do that?
They ring me while they do it. I'm constantly having to listen to them pleasure themselves while talking dirty to me about their voluntary celibacy. They even call me at work. I can't even take my kids to the park without some volcel woman bailing me up and telling me how when she thinks about me she touches herself.
^ I know right. I was just outside and I could see the ankle's of at least five men. Those whores should cover themselves up.
BARE ARMS, I can see that alt-right harlots arms. I feel traumatised, quickly, to my side with the smelling salts!^ I know right. I was just outside and I could see the ankle's of at least five men. Those whores should cover themselves up.
No that is not what I am saying. Your spinning what I am saying. I am saying that BOTH men and women should at least wear a shirt, and hide their private parts. They should not delibaretely entice people of the opposite gender. For example, if a man shows a women his junk, she will find it disgusting. So therefore a woman should not show a man her junk. And there are children out in public as well. They should not have to deal with seeing such obscenity. How don’t you see how it is disgusting for someone to shake their ass in front of a child? Does dress code matter? This is a woman that I consider to be modest. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Rs4Eqxow5PM
^ I know right. I was just outside and I could see the ankle's of at least five men. Those whores should cover themselves up.
No that is not what I am saying. Your spinning what I am saying. I am saying that BOTH men and women should at least wear a shirt, and hide their private parts. They should not delibaretely entice people of the opposite gender. For example, if a man shows a women his junk, she will find it disgusting. So therefore a woman should not show a man her junk. And there are children out in public as well. They should not have to deal with seeing such obscenity. How don’t you see how it is disgusting for someone to shake their ass in front of a child? Does dress code matter? This is a woman that I consider to be modest. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Rs4Eqxow5PM
Look I am only prepared to accept your apology if you stop thinking about me when you masturbate cracker.
I do not masterbate to you. I just feel angry when you act perverted around woman who do not want you to do so. You and others keep bombarding me with sexual jokes.
The reason why I was talking to you is because I feel more comfortable talking to males my age about it, then adults like psychiatrists who would say that my fetish is not curable. Why can’t hospitals provide people with castration surgery, if they provide people with other hormonal changes like transgender surgery.
So you don't want me to chop your man berries off? You're breaking my heart, man, you're breaking my heart.
Well other commenters tell me of the risk of infection, or bleeding to death. I do not know how experienced you are at doing it. I mean if I die from the injuries, then I would go to hell for commiting suicide. Besides I do not trust if you will keep your word when I pay you money. I mean, I would certainly never castrate someone who asked me to do so.