A(nother) dangerous opinion.
You really do think highly of yourself, don't you. I mean, just from the title. Unless you are an actual authority on the relevant subject, that's
generally a very bad sign.
I'm aware that you probably see yourself as "trolling" and "not serious" and "fucking with us" to "see the butthurt reactions". I'm also very much aware that trolls usually do a terrible job trying to hide their real opinions and personality, if they bother at all. That characteristic combination of arrogance and stupidity doesn't just belong to your troll persona, it's very much yours, honey. It doesn't take Freud to notice that.
Your entire argument relies on two incredibly ass-backwards ideas:
- That Clinton's defeat was mainly caused by higher-than-expected Republican turnout. It wasn't ; Trump didn't win the election ; Clinton lost it. She failed to bring her likely voters to the booths. You can be certain this has absolutely nothing to do with the fabricated scandal one week before the elections, nor with the wave of voter suppression that was backed up by the fucking Supreme Court.
- That any discrepancy in favor of Trump is most logically explained by social intimidation from whoever is currently around the responder. Simply put : most people aren't as edgy and clear-minded and shameless as you are. Many Trump voters were disgusted with the character and/or had some moral qualms about throwing underprivileged groups under the bus, but felt that they still had to vote for him, either by party loyalty or because they saw him as a "way out" of conventional politics. Those people were personally ashamed of their choice, even outside of any immediate social pressure, and justifiably so. This may actually explain why Trump did surprisingly well with white women.
Note that I was being generous in the previous point, since you were specifically talking about roving bands of
liberal youths looking out for anything that might be interpreted as tacit or overt support for Trump, ready to bury the offender under an onslaught of... trigger warnings? Improvised dissertations filled with -isms? Physical violence? It doesn't really matter, since this is obviously your "trolling" opinion, an Overton-window-pushing red herring to attract emotional responses and make your sincerely held opinion (cf first sentence of the point) seem more sensible by comparison.
When it comes to your own thoughts at the very least, you seem to have have a hard time telling apart audacity and vacuity. It's really a shame that Trump decided to center his artificial affect on gross lower-class sensitivities, rather than the more aristocratic brand of conservatism you desperately try to pose as. I'm sure you would be head over heels in love with him.
