Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1
Society and History / Re: Incels General Thread
« Last post by Tolpuddle Martyr on Today at 02:37:52 pm »
presumably sweat and desiccated semen
...and a body pillow decorated with a 14 yo manga character.
2
Preaching and Worship / Re: More proof that Catholicism is true
« Last post by Art Vandelay on Today at 01:54:59 pm »
Is a spiritual crisis anything like a time crisis? Because if so, shooting a couple of hundred terrorists tends to solve the problem.
3
This explains how Michael was the true heir to the throne after Jacob Harrison discovered proof against Papal Infallibility http://forums.fstdt.net/index.php?topic=8114.0 which affects who the rightful heir to the throne is.

King Jaime died on May 7 2018. Normally the throne would go to his younger brother, but the Arch Cleric of the Europan Kingdom, Jacob Harrison made an announcement on who should be King. His announcement was broadcasted live on TV.

“Citizens of the Europan Kingdom. I recently realized that King Jaime who is now at peace in heaven was not the true heir. I found this out by doing research on the history of the Catholic Church. I found that in 1870 a Roman Catholic clergy man in England, the Rev. Mr. Roberts, evidently thinking that the time had come to tell the truth, published a book entitled The Pontifical Decrees against the Earth's Movement, and in this exhibited the incontrovertible evidences that the papacy had committed itself and its infallibility fully against the movement of the earth. This Catholic clergyman showed from the original record that Pope Paul V, in 1616, had presided over the tribunal condemning the doctrine of the earth's movement, and ordering Galileo to give up the opinion. He showed that Pope Urban VIII, in 1633, pressed on, directed, and promulgated the final condemnation, making himself in all these ways responsible for it.

This is irrefutable proof that we all were mistaken that the Vicars of Christ, the Popes of Rome are not infallible when speaking ex cathedra, defining doctrine concerning faith or morals. The First Vatican Council was mistaken.

How does this affect who the rightful King is? Well, I thought that Jaime was the rightful King because King Henry II of England’s marriage with Eleanor of Aquitaine violated the Catholic Church’s Canon law on Consanguinity. However since the Popes are proven to be fallible, the doctrine of consanguinity is therefore fallible as well, so King Henry II’s marriage was a valid marriage after all, since the Church gave no opposition to it. His children were therefore legitimate and his sons and children were therefore the legitimate Kings of England.

From 1455 to 1485 there was the wars of the Roses, a civil war in England between two rival branches of the House of Plantagenet, the House of Lancaster, and the House of York fighting over the throne of England. The House of York had a more legitimate claim to the throne because they were descended from Edward III’s older son Lionel Duke of Clarence.

After Edward IV’s death, at first his son Edward V succeeded to the throne. However it was later determined that Edward V was a son of Edward IV’s illegitimate bigamous marriage so Edward IV’s Richard III became King until he died in the battle of Bosworth fields. The Lancasterian claimant, Henry VII Tudor became King and attempted to secure his succession by marrying Elizabeth Woodville a daughter of Edward IV’s bigamous marriage. It was a false unification because Elizabeth Woodville was not a legitimate daughter. Under the Tudors, Richard III was maliciously slandered by Tudor historians and Shakespeare’s plays.

The true successors to Richard III come from the descendants of his eldest sister Anne of York. And the true heir to the throne is therefore Michael of the House of Honeywood. He is also the heir to the Lordship of Ireland, and Kingdom of France due to English claims to the French throne.

Here causes problems with the Catholic Church because they canonized Joan of Arc, the woman who allegedly had visions of God that told her to fight for France against the English during the Hundred Years War. Today, there is psychological explanations for her visions. She was misguided but genuinely thought she was following God’s will. God rest her soul. So to solve the problems, we forced the Catholic Church to make an official declaration, about how she was misguided by her hallucinations.

So I will crown Michael King at a coronation ceremony tomorrow. The flag of the Europan Kingdom will also be changed, to have a combined flag of England, Ireland, and France to represent the thrones that the Honeywood monarchs are the heirs to. God save Europa!”
4
Preaching and Worship / Re: More proof that Catholicism is true
« Last post by KingOfRhye on Today at 08:47:06 am »
Best way to avoid spiritual crises: Don't be spiritual.   :P
5
Preaching and Worship / Niam should know this.
« Last post by Jacob Harrison on Today at 07:53:09 am »
This is something that Niam should know about King Michael’s ancestry. I did research on Galileo and found out that the Pope committed an ex cathedra error disproving Papal Infallibility.

In the parallel universe, I as Arch Cleric must have done research and discovered that. And it affected who the true heir was. I therefore discovered that Michael not Jaime was the true heir, so after Jaime’s death I spoke in favor of Michael’s succession after Jaime’s death in 2018. It also caused me to convert from Roman Catholicism to Anglo Catholicism.

Papal infallibility affects who the true heir was because it means that the Church Canon law of consanguinity against Henry II’s marriage does not matter since they did not annul the marriage and therefore his children and successors are legitimate. It means that his descendants, the Yorkist kings Edward IV and his brother Richard III were the rightful kings of England and Richard III was England’s last true king. His seizure of the throne from his nephew Edward V was because they were the illegitimate children of Edward IV’s false bigamous marriage. Michael must be the Yorkist heir to the throne by being a descendant of Richard III’s eldest sister.

By the way, how is your college work going? Will you soon have the time to write Chapter 11 Part 2. Also, please explain why you said that Parallel Hero is not a Christian story. The main character is a Christin Knight.
6
Preaching and Worship / Re: More proof that Catholicism is true
« Last post by Tolpuddle Martyr on Today at 07:45:40 am »
Ok, have fun.
7
Preaching and Worship / Re: More proof that Catholicism is true
« Last post by Jacob Harrison on Today at 07:40:25 am »
1. Said tribunal answers to the Pope, like everything inthat organization, they certainly don't rule in a high profile case without his blessing.

2. It's. Not. Working. It hasn't worked and it won't work, it's pointless. Unless you're here to troll, that is working for what it's worth I guess.

1. But the specific decree made by the tribunal was not formally signed by Pope Urban VIII.

2. I keep trying because I want to give you as many opportunities as possible to save your souls.
Nothing that high profile gets done in the RCC without papal approval, particularly during that period in history. Context: in his Dialogue on Two World Systems Galileo, which was only done that way because of church pressure he sets up a Socratic dialogue between a Gary Stu character representing himself and Simplicio, whose name has implications that aren't hard to work out who's a stand in for the Pope.

Galileo dissed the Pope, subtlety but it was there so don't tell me the Pope had nothing to do with his persecution.

Also if you genuinely believed in souls and the need for their salvation you'd think that you would employ methods that weren't do consistently mocked and derided around here that you keep repeating despite the consistent negative feedback. Your schtick does not work!

You don't think name calling, fuck-yous and rolling on the floor laughing at you are signals of receptivity and approval, do you?

Protip: Youtube mockumentaries and docudramas of dubious authenticity have never worked, this one will not work.

I did more research on it and found out that “In 1870 a Roman Catholic clergy man in England, the Rev. Mr. Roberts, evidently thinking that the time had come to tell the truth, published a book entitled The Pontifical Decrees against the Earth's Movement, and in this exhibited the incontrovertible evidences that the papacy had committed itself and its infallibility fully against the movement of the earth. This Catholic clergyman showed from the original record that Pope Paul V, in 1616, had presided over the tribunal condemning the doctrine of the earth's movement, and ordering Galileo to give up the opinion. He showed that Pope Urban VIII, in 1633, pressed on, directed, and promulgated the final condemnation, making himself in all these ways responsible for it.”

I am therefore in another spiritual crisis.
8
Preaching and Worship / Re: More proof that Catholicism is true
« Last post by Skybison on Today at 01:11:29 am »
It wasn't necessary for God to explain germ theory, or electricity to the Pope because other people discovered those things.

How many people died, or lived more awful and miserable lives because God didn't explain that stuff to us earlier?
9
Preaching and Worship / Re: More proof that Catholicism is true
« Last post by Skybison on Today at 01:03:21 am »
It is a failure but it is not an ex cathedra failure because he didn’t define geocentrism as a doctrine to be upheld by the entire church. I was responding to and debunking Skybison’s argument that the Galileo incident disproves Papal Infallibility.

And you miss my point.  I don't believe in Papal Infallibility because it's only been used on stuff that's impossibly to verify.  If the Pope was always right about stuff that could be double checked I'd believe it.  But plenty of stuff he's said has been proven wrong, and Ctholic say that doesn't count.  If he was infallible why doesn't he use it for anything useful?
10
Society and History / Re: Incels General Thread
« Last post by davedan on Today at 12:59:12 am »
presumably sweat and desiccated semen
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10