[blockquoteOkay, we had expected the TV networks to possibly take legal action against DISH Networks for its new Auto Hopper technology, which allows DISH subscribers who use the Hopper feature (which records all prime time shows from the four major networks) to autoskip commercials, if they watch shows in the days after they originally air. It wasn't a surprise that the TV networks didn't like this at all, but could they really make a legal argument that skipping commercials was against the law? We've all heard the story of former Turner Broadcasting exec Jamie Kellner claiming that not watching commercials was "theft," but do the networks actually think there's a legal basis for such claims?
It appears they do. Though, the legal arguments are insane.
What's scary, however, is that the TV networks appear to be using this lawsuit to claim that skipping commercials is copyright infringement.
Where the filings go really off the wall is in basically saying that skipping commercials is infringement. They do this in the sections on "inducement," wherein they suggest that, even if DISH doesn't directly infringe, it is is inducing infringement by offering the auto commercial skip feature to users.[/blockquote]
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120525/04185919074/tv-networks-file-legal-claims-saying-skipping-commercials-is-copyright-infringement.shtmlWhat the hell. How is being able to skip commercials copyright infringement? I just don't get this. Well I guess all I have to say is good luck dumbasses. I doubt you could actually prove skipping commercials is copyright infringement of any kind.