So much butthurt over the fact that GitHub deleted a piece of political satire from their source-sharing service. I find it quite ironic from an anti-feminist group to use a completely inappropriate support for their soapboxing - and then complain about censorship when they are legitimately shut down. Isn't that a feminist stereotype?
As far as the actual... piece of work... goes, its authors clearly tried to write a smart, polemical and thought-provoking satire of
feminism in general, beyond the specific article that inspired its theme. As far as I'm concerned, most of the humor comes from trying to imagine how such a language would function, rather than how those crazy ideas for a programming language connect with the "crazy feminist ideas". The actual satirical elements are of the lowest and laziest kind, relying exclusively on ridicule, strawmanning and the occasional bit of sarcasm, only good to preach to the converted.
It doesn't even really make the effort to point out the ridiculousness of their arguments. It just... let them speak for themselves, which is admittedly enough to discredit them. The problem being of course that the whole thing relies entirely on a strawman, that their "feminist" opinions are in fact an extremely poor representation of what feminists actually think, and that many of them comes from typical SJW/libtard strawman talking points
other than feminism. As a result, it makes the concept of feminism look only as inherently ridiculous as anti-racism, LGBT acceptance and rights, opposition to strict social hierarchy, wealth redistribution of any kind, and generally not being a narrow-minded, selfish, authoritarian dickwad. I doubt this was the intent of the satire.
It's also choke-full of incoherences. In the "Philosophy" section, C+= is established as a functional language, even though the very concept of functions is "feminized" as lobbying later on and then finally condemned outright. Exceptions are associated with "trigger warnings", that is, with objectionable material that should presumably be censored in stereotypical feminazi fashion... yet we are later told to "accept the program the way it is" and not debug it nor even catch the exceptions in the name of "free speech". The checking of privilege plays two unrelated roles in data typing and function execution. I don't think any of these are intentional "in-character" contradictions intended to make a satirical point.
Then you have those parts that are just plain shitty. Not shitty as in shitty satire. Shitty as in shitty shit written by shitty people. Sigmaleph already pointed out the trivialization of rape, but even that is technically arguable ; perhaps the aspiring satirists suddenly remembered they were supposed to parody a specific article rather than attack dem evul feminazis and used sexual consent as an exemple of a legitimate concept transposed into an illegitimate context. The transphobia, however, is NOT arguable. The section titled "On 1s and 0s" mocks the very idea that gender and sex are not a binary in the absolute strictest meaning of the term.
In a few occasions, the satire does actually take on some actual transgressions commonly found in serious, modern, mainstream feminist discourse. I won't go so far as to call it a "stopped clock", but the bad far outweighs the good.
