Worst of Social Justice

[The Right Honourable Mlle Antéchrist]

Meanwhile in radfem land:

Q:So it's a bad thing to like down right rough sex?

A:you’re not a shitty person for it, but yeah asserting dominance over a woman via sex is rape.

Because a woman enjoying rough sex is totally akin to rape.

The best part is that this moron is essentially saying that by their logic, someone can be a rapist and still be a good person overall. That's a rather interesting implication, I have to say.

Oh my God, the other day, I was taking one of my tours through Cathy Brennan's mystical land of batshittery, & I found myself on a site detailing how penis-in-vaginal sex is a heinous crime. I wish I could find it again, but choice excerpts were, paraphrased to the best of my recollection:

"It can literally kill you, from complications from pregnancy & STDs."
"These complications don't exist for men. What if men could literally die from sex? Then would we care?"
"What kind of person would want to do this to a woman? What kind of woman would want to do this?"
"All penetrative sex is rape."

Ah, yes. The "we shall empower women by treating all of them like naive children, incapable of assessing risks and consenting to sex" mindset.

[chitoryu12]

It's a good thing sexually transmitted HIV/AIDS isn't a thing; people would die from that.

What's worse is that in the paraphrased quote, she specifically brings up STDs and then says that men don't suffer from that.

Literally saying that men can't get STDs.

[Shane for Wax]

Meanwhile in radfem land:

Q:So it's a bad thing to like down right rough sex?

A:you’re not a shitty person for it, but yeah asserting dominance over a woman via sex is rape.

Because a woman enjoying rough sex is totally akin to rape.

Oh good. I'm a rapist. I better go add that to my description on my tumblr.

[Distind]

Ah, yes. The "we shall empower women by treating all of them like naive children, incapable of assessing risks and consenting to sex" mindset.

Some times I wonder if they're just plain afraid of sex, possibly just with men, but given some of the other things I've seen I'm not sure that's the limit of it.

[Canadian Mojo]

Ah, yes. The "we shall empower women by treating all of them like naive children, incapable of assessing risks and consenting to sex" mindset.

Some times I wonder if they're just plain afraid of sex, possibly just with men, but given some of the other things I've seen I'm not sure that's the limit of it.

Closet Christians with some rather deep rooted guilt issues about enjoying themselves?

[Lithp]

Honestly, my favorite part about the article is none of the stuff that's been mentioned. It's the "why would anyone do this?" I imagine it has nothing to do with biological compulsion to preserve the species. And they can't even get out of it with the turkey baster method, because pregnancy is one of the main things they cite as proof that "it can literally kill you."

[The Right Honourable Mlle Antéchrist]

Not to mention that sex -- yes, even the evil vaginal intercourse -- feels pretty god damn good. And, being a competent adult who is capable of measuring and taking steps to minimize risks, and not a helpless child, I choose to engage in it by my own free will.

But obviously I'm just too dumb and brainwashed to realize that I'm actually being raped every time I have sex willingly.

[Lithp]

Oh, they had counters for those.

The claim was that few women enjoy vaginal sex & most find it uncomfortable, & the question "is it really okay to put her life in danger just because she 'wants you to'? Do you feel comfortable with that?"

[Canadian Mojo]

Oh, they had counters for those.

The claim was that few women enjoy vaginal sex & most find it uncomfortable, & the question "is it really okay to put her life in danger just because she 'wants you to'? Do you feel comfortable with that?"

I guess I'm lucky I found one of the few, and I drive her to the store when she asks which I suspect is far more statistically likely to result in death then engaging in vaginal intercourse with her. 

[shykid]

Oh, they had counters for those.

The claim was that few women enjoy vaginal sex & most find it uncomfortable, & the question "is it really okay to put her life in danger just because she 'wants you to'? Do you feel comfortable with that?"

I guess I'm lucky I found one of the few, and I drive her to the store when she asks which I suspect is far more statistically likely to result in death then engaging in vaginal intercourse with her. 

Now I have the urge to Google statistics on people dying from sex.

[mellenORL]

The danger is that PIV sex may lead to crotchspawn that eventually blog utter nonsense that undermines interest in discussing real issues blogged about by intelligent people.

[TheUnknown]

Oh, they had counters for those.

The claim was that few women enjoy vaginal sex & most find it uncomfortable, & the question "is it really okay to put her life in danger just because she 'wants you to'? Do you feel comfortable with that?"

I thought the statistic was that the majority of women are unable to get off on vaginal sex alone, not that the majority of women are unable to enjoy vaginal sex at all.

[The Right Honourable Mlle Antéchrist]

Oh, they had counters for those.

The claim was that few women enjoy vaginal sex & most find it uncomfortable, & the question "is it really okay to put her life in danger just because she 'wants you to'? Do you feel comfortable with that?"

So, women are idiots who need men to protect us from our own stupidity. Got it.

[Thejebusfire]

Or maybe the creators make them that way because they're actually are people out there who can't eat sugar and gluten?

[niam2023]

Or are people who want to help people actually, oh, I dunno, mind their weight? Maybe some people are actually interested in healthy living instead of "accepting fatness."

My dad almost DIED due to his weight problem.