I got to the "invented spelling" shit and had to stop. It's not that students are getting "dumber" or "smarter," but that they are expected to know different things. Memorizing historical dates has no practical application beyond a history major; rote memorization of spelling words does nothing to teach the pronunciation, spelling, or meaning of new words. Teaching has become about broader concepts and connections, which has its flaws, but then, so did the original system they want to go back to. Otherwise it wouldn't have been changed.
+1
Yes, it is embarrassing if, in a discussion, I have to Google the dates of the Civil War. It makes me look stupid. However, I should point out that being forced to memorize this date doesn't contribute in any way to my understanding of the war in question; I still know quite a bit about it. I just don't remember some number that's tangentally related to it. So I would ask: Which is more helpful to teach American students?
1. The American Civil War was fought between 1861-1865 (I thought it was 1850; I was close!)
2. The Civil War was almost won by the South due to a crippling lack of military strategy by the North's forces; they pulled a British Empire and tried to march straight in, only to be destroyed by Robert E. Lee. In fact, until the Battle of Gettysburg, the South was all set to march on Washington, D.C.
If it seems I'm being unfair by including WAY more info in #2, consider this: I had to Google the dates; I memorized #2.