Hardly. That's not even addressing my point. I'm not talking about their race or anything. My point is you put a terrorist on the cover of Rolling Stone. Why not put them on the cover of People and Us? After all, if it's fine for them to be on Rolling Stone, why not there? I think they should be on no magazine covers. None. Zip. Zero. Nada. Not Time. Not Newsweek. Most certainly not fucking Rolling Stone.
So your argument has boiled down to "I don't agree with it so it should not be."
No, it's more along the lines of "It's been shown, no matter how much TIM tries to deny it, that this is a bad, bad thing that causes problems (and seriously, how can anyone support fame for murderers?)"
Psychopaths do not act in rational, predictable manner because they are detached from reality.
How much are you going to willfully ignore? Let’s go down the list:
Dave Cullen, author of the Columbine book you cite as proof, specifically created the term "normal lens” to conceptualize that psychopaths do not act in a predictable manner because they are detached from reality.
The rest of the entire chapter aptly titled Psychopath of the Columbine book you cite as proof.
The entirety of Axis I from the DSM-IV onward which spells out in great detail what constitutes psychosis and how it differentiates from other psychological disorders.
As it often does, FAIR hits the nail on the head
http://www.fair.org/blog/2013/07/25/the-rolling-stone-cover-and-the-new-ideological-threat/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=the-rolling-stone-cover-and-the-new-ideological-threat
Hardly. That's not even addressing my point. I'm not talking about their race or anything. My point is you put a terrorist on the cover of Rolling Stone. Why not put them on the cover of People and Us? After all, if it's fine for them to be on Rolling Stone, why not there? I think they should be on no magazine covers. None. Zip. Zero. Nada. Not Time. Not Newsweek. Most certainly not fucking Rolling Stone.
Which is not censorship because?
It's not government mandated. It would be corporations having tact. However, tact is dead. The almighty dollar killed it. I'm glad to see you support the pursuit of money over any tact or sanity.
Censorship requires government mandate? I call bullshit and challenge you to demonstrate how and why ever entity other than government inherently cannot censor.