Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1
Preaching and Worship / Niam should know this.
« Last post by Jacob Harrison on Today at 07:53:09 am »
This is something that Niam should know about King Michael’s ancestry. I did research on Galileo and found out that the Pope committed an ex cathedra error disproving Papal Infallibility.

In the parallel universe, I as Arch Cleric must have done research and discovered that. And it affected who the true heir was. I therefore discovered that Michael not Jaime was the true heir, so after Jaime’s death I spoke in favor of Michael’s succession after Jaime’s death in 2018. It also caused me to convert from Roman Catholicism to Anglo Catholicism.

Papal infallibility affects who the true heir was because it means that the Church Canon law of consanguinity against Henry II’s marriage does not matter since they did not annul the marriage and therefore his children and successors are legitimate. It means that his descendants, the Yorkist kings Edward IV and his brother Richard III were the rightful kings of England and Richard III was England’s last true king. His seizure of the throne from his nephew Edward V was because they were the illegitimate children of Edward IV’s false bigamous marriage. Michael must be the Yorkist heir to the throne by being a descendant of Richard III’s eldest sister.

By the way, how is your college work going? Will you soon have the time to write Chapter 11 Part 2. Also, please explain why you said that Parallel Hero is not a Christian story. The main character is a Christin Knight.
2
Preaching and Worship / Re: More proof that Catholicism is true
« Last post by Tolpuddle Martyr on Today at 07:45:40 am »
Ok, have fun.
3
Preaching and Worship / Re: More proof that Catholicism is true
« Last post by Jacob Harrison on Today at 07:40:25 am »
1. Said tribunal answers to the Pope, like everything inthat organization, they certainly don't rule in a high profile case without his blessing.

2. It's. Not. Working. It hasn't worked and it won't work, it's pointless. Unless you're here to troll, that is working for what it's worth I guess.

1. But the specific decree made by the tribunal was not formally signed by Pope Urban VIII.

2. I keep trying because I want to give you as many opportunities as possible to save your souls.
Nothing that high profile gets done in the RCC without papal approval, particularly during that period in history. Context: in his Dialogue on Two World Systems Galileo, which was only done that way because of church pressure he sets up a Socratic dialogue between a Gary Stu character representing himself and Simplicio, whose name has implications that aren't hard to work out who's a stand in for the Pope.

Galileo dissed the Pope, subtlety but it was there so don't tell me the Pope had nothing to do with his persecution.

Also if you genuinely believed in souls and the need for their salvation you'd think that you would employ methods that weren't do consistently mocked and derided around here that you keep repeating despite the consistent negative feedback. Your schtick does not work!

You don't think name calling, fuck-yous and rolling on the floor laughing at you are signals of receptivity and approval, do you?

Protip: Youtube mockumentaries and docudramas of dubious authenticity have never worked, this one will not work.

I did more research on it and found out that “In 1870 a Roman Catholic clergy man in England, the Rev. Mr. Roberts, evidently thinking that the time had come to tell the truth, published a book entitled The Pontifical Decrees against the Earth's Movement, and in this exhibited the incontrovertible evidences that the papacy had committed itself and its infallibility fully against the movement of the earth. This Catholic clergyman showed from the original record that Pope Paul V, in 1616, had presided over the tribunal condemning the doctrine of the earth's movement, and ordering Galileo to give up the opinion. He showed that Pope Urban VIII, in 1633, pressed on, directed, and promulgated the final condemnation, making himself in all these ways responsible for it.”

I am therefore in another spiritual crisis.
4
Preaching and Worship / Re: More proof that Catholicism is true
« Last post by Skybison on Today at 01:11:29 am »
It wasn't necessary for God to explain germ theory, or electricity to the Pope because other people discovered those things.

How many people died, or lived more awful and miserable lives because God didn't explain that stuff to us earlier?
5
Preaching and Worship / Re: More proof that Catholicism is true
« Last post by Skybison on Today at 01:03:21 am »
It is a failure but it is not an ex cathedra failure because he didn’t define geocentrism as a doctrine to be upheld by the entire church. I was responding to and debunking Skybison’s argument that the Galileo incident disproves Papal Infallibility.

And you miss my point.  I don't believe in Papal Infallibility because it's only been used on stuff that's impossibly to verify.  If the Pope was always right about stuff that could be double checked I'd believe it.  But plenty of stuff he's said has been proven wrong, and Ctholic say that doesn't count.  If he was infallible why doesn't he use it for anything useful?
6
Society and History / Re: Incels General Thread
« Last post by davedan on Today at 12:59:12 am »
presumably sweat and desiccated semen
7
Society and History / Re: Incels General Thread
« Last post by Tolpuddle Martyr on November 13, 2018, 11:34:59 pm »
Sorry. My school didn't offer any classics on the metric system. My, um, associates had to teach me and we only dealt in weights. Centilters then.
Er what is the liquid medium I'm smelling the incel through? Exactly how traumatizing is this experience going to be?
8
Preaching and Worship / Re: More proof that Catholicism is true
« Last post by Tolpuddle Martyr on November 13, 2018, 08:58:34 pm »
1. Said tribunal answers to the Pope, like everything inthat organization, they certainly don't rule in a high profile case without his blessing.

2. It's. Not. Working. It hasn't worked and it won't work, it's pointless. Unless you're here to troll, that is working for what it's worth I guess.

1. But the specific decree made by the tribunal was not formally signed by Pope Urban VIII.

2. I keep trying because I want to give you as many opportunities as possible to save your souls.
Nothing that high profile gets done in the RCC without papal approval, particularly during that period in history. Context: in his Dialogue on Two World Systems Galileo, which was only done that way because of church pressure he sets up a Socratic dialogue between a Gary Stu character representing himself and Simplicio, whose name has implications that aren't hard to work out who's a stand in for the Pope.

Galileo dissed the Pope, subtlety but it was there so don't tell me the Pope had nothing to do with his persecution.

Also if you genuinely believed in souls and the need for their salvation you'd think that you would employ methods that weren't do consistently mocked and derided around here that you keep repeating despite the consistent negative feedback. Your schtick does not work!

You don't think name calling, fuck-yous and rolling on the floor laughing at you are signals of receptivity and approval, do you?

Protip: Youtube mockumentaries and docudramas of dubious authenticity have never worked, this one will not work.
9
Preaching and Worship / Re: More proof that Catholicism is true
« Last post by Jacob Harrison on November 13, 2018, 08:52:36 pm »
souls.

Oh good. Let's start there. Proof that souls even exist, please?

This video is scientific proof that during near death experiences, people’s souls actually leave the body. Therefore people’s near death experiences of either heaven or hell are therefore real. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=s0F5F4hp3mY
10
Preaching and Worship / Re: More proof that Catholicism is true
« Last post by dpareja on November 13, 2018, 08:26:47 pm »
souls.

Oh good. Let's start there. Proof that souls even exist, please?
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10