Recent Posts

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10
21
Well, when it comes to videos on YouTube I have been sharing your most famous and well known one with many, many people - I speak of course about the oink video. Everyone laughs and thinks you're fucking nuts. People are going to see your video en masse and mirror it and make hilarious dubstep parodies of it.

Everyone will know you as Jacob Harrison, the pig boy.

...well, unless you make one more video for me...
22
Well if there was a Levis catalogue handy, something would have been released from your body!
23
Pfft. Take notes, little boy. This here is a real national anthem.
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dIV-QdPEx-Q" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dIV-QdPEx-Q</a>
24
I wonder, are planning to find the rightful ruler of every single former noble title in Britain, down to the last barony, like you are for the kingdom? It's all well and good to find the rightful King of England, but what about the rightful Duke of Kent, or Earl of Suffolk, for example? After all, a king is far from the sole rightful owner of the land within a kingdom. Outside of his demesne, its his vassals, both direct and indirect, that are the rightful owners of the land (and each duchy and earldom with its own independent succession laws, just to make it even more fun), and those claims are every bit as important as the king's. If you want to restore feudalism to England with the descendants of the old nobility in power, there's a lot more to consider than just the king himself.

Well most of the barrons are the rightful rulers of their lands by inheritance and are part of the current House of Lords.
"Most" barons, and nary a mention of the earls, dukes, marquises and other landed nobility (not to mention, the clergy), huh? In other words, just ignore everything below the king and hope it works out. Doesn't exactly inspire confidence, I have to say. If you want people to get on board with your plan, you really ought to do things properly. After all, if you clearly don't give a shit, why should anyone else?
I couldn't help but notice you've yet to address this. What, you only care about one title out of hundreds? You expect fellow feudal restorationists to fight for a mere shadow of the former Kingdom of England? A thin veneer of restored nobility that neglects the rightful owners of the lands outside of the king's demesne?

You make me want to wretch.
25
Seek psychiatric help.

Immediately.

Seriously, get help, dude.
26
1. Being a "tribe" does not make a group primitive, or the reverse. The Aztecs, Incas, etc., had "Empires"--were they primitive? The conquistadors certainly thought so. For that matter, the Iroquois Confederacy partially inspired the US Constitution, but they've also been called primitive.

2. One, bats are not birds, two, the Bible proves itself wrong by being logically inconsistent.

3. "Creator" was, as has been repeatedly pointed out, a reference to a deistic notion (and even then was a mangling of Jefferson's original), and even so does not necessarily refer to a monotheistic creator. The religious views of the people are not relevant in this matter.

4. The New Testament says you can sin however the fuck much you want and get into Heaven as long as you kiss the invisible Jigglypuff-in-space's ass. See Matthew 5, particularly verse 19.

5. Why do you Christians need to use the government to force everyone else to act as your religion commands?



6a. Which I already pointed out is a massively flawed process.

6b. ONLY IF THE PEOPLE VOTE ON IT. This is why Spain is legitimately a monarchy, as is Norway, as is Australia, as is Belgium, along with a number of other nations; however note that these countries are parliamentary constitutional monarchies, with the monarch acting as the head of state while the actual executive power is exercised by those with the democratic legitimacy to do so.

6c. See 6a.

6d. And who the fuck is the Church accountable to? The Church was just as bad then as they are now; perhaps in different ways, but they were absolutely fucking corrupt (fucking in both the literal and figurative senses). Again, nobody has ever produced a proof of God's existence (and those claiming it have the burden of proof), and any god that has been posited by humanity has been disproven.

6e. That's hardly a guarantee, especially if the monarch has acted in a way to endear the military to himself and make it clear that loyalty will be richly rewarded in the event of rebellion. As for "legitimate Democracy", the UK is a legitimate democracy (indeed no system of government that is not democratic can be legitimate, as they lack the vital popular mandate), you're just pissy about how it got there.
27
This youtube video documents it. Now since my consciousness is merged into one, I will make an animated youtube movie documenting the events that happened in that universe, where the rightful heir to the Kingdom of England, Lordship of Ireland, and Duchy of Normandy was restored to the throne in order to promote the legitimacy cause in this universe.

In the parallel universe created by time travelling aliens who created it based on my ideas from this universe, the aliens a descendant of Sir Lancelot, Gabriel Dulac was seduced into having sex with the Crown Prince’s wife leading to events that caused the King’s fall from power, the moral of the story is that you should not have extramarital sex.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NxJGLnWkUKk&feature=youtu.be
28
When did they specifically say that was a mortal sin, when did they remove it. Citation needed!

Well rape has always been considered a mortal sin. While it is still Catholic doctrine that rape is a mortal sin, they no longer teach it to their clergy.
They don't teach their own doctrine to their clergy? Oh go play with your magic fetishes.

And your denim one while you're at it, while dreaming about your cuz!
29
When did they specifically say that was a mortal sin, when did they remove it. Citation needed!

Well rape has always been considered a mortal sin. While it is still Catholic doctrine that rape is a mortal sin, they no longer teach it to their clergy.
30
When did they specifically say that was a mortal sin, when did they remove it. Citation needed!
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10