Do you acknowledge that Likud's founding document denies Palestinians any substantive rights?
It does not. The charter acknowledges the right of Palestinians to self govern as long as they do not infringe on Israel's right to exist.
No, it doesn't. It's quite clear. Palestinians have no right to self-govern, nor do they have a right to vote in Israeli elections or any protections under Israeli law. They are to remain stateless forever - or, preferably, go the hell away.
My personal favourite part is the reference to Israeli control of Palestinian ecology - which, again, shall be controlled by the IDF in the interests of Israel. Even better, unlike Palestine, Israel has actually acted upon these stated goals. No government of Israel has ever accepted the right of a Palestinian state to exist, unlike Fatah. This is why none currently does.
Every time Israel concedes (often giving back land they won in a war they didn't start), they are rewarded with more rocket attacks.
This is probably the greatest fraud of all (second maybe to your blaming of the Six-day and Yom Kippur Wars on the Palestinians). Israel has never given up one inch of land. Israel has yet to make a single concession to any other country, ever, even the Egyptians. Not one inch of Israeli land conquered through war has been acquired legitimately - indeed, the modern state system is founded entirely on the principle that all such land claims based on force are entirely illegitimate always everywhere and forever.
Hamas et al oppose Israel because their pedophile thug who founded their religion told them to hate the Jews. If they want a fight, I say sit back and let Israel give them a fight. I will enjoy it immensely.
This is straight uncut racism, the good stuff. Indeed, it is anti-semitism (since Palestinians are a semitic people).
Seriously, are people blaming Israel here? Sure, I don't like all their leaders or policies, but show me where in Likud's platform you can find the complete destruction of all Arabs.
The Party charter.
"The Government of Israel flatly rejects the establishment of a Palestinian Arab state west of the Jordan river. The Palestinians can run their lives freely in the framework of self-rule, but not as an independent and sovereign state. Thus, for example, in matters of foreign affairs, security, immigration and ecology, their activity shall be limited in accordance with imperatives of Israel’s existence, security and national needs"
Palestinians have no rights. If they're angry about it, we're happy to bomb them flat.
That's not what it says. The charter calls for the Palestinians to not have an independent state (which is admittedly extreme), but it only says they cannot infringe on Israel's national security and right to exist (which even many moderates Palestinians deny). I specifically asked for where in Likud's platform they called for the destruction of all Arabs (as in, killing them all for the crime of existing).
Do you acknowledge that Likud's founding document denies Palestinians any substantive rights?
I do. But I don't like Likud anyway. Vote for Kadima!
That's nice. The current government, however, believes that Palestinians are subhumans. All policy is based on that principle. Palestinians have no rights to own land, so settlements are fine. Indeed, any response to the monstrous and violent occupation is illegitimate, since subhumans have no rights. Subhumans have no right to import food beyond their basic minimum requirement to maintain existence, much like a dog you don't like much. Even then that may be excessive. And if we choose, we can bomb them with illegal weapons all day long. Murder is only a crime when committed against people, not animals.
