Violence at Berkeley

[Askold]

Not content with just moving the goalposts now you try to rewrite the history as well?

[davedan]

Sounds like handwringing to me. What are feminists, for instance, meant to do about misogynists delegitimizing their movement? What are/ were civil rights activists meant to do about Black Separatists?

Seems to me that the biggest problem they face is simple-minded or ill-intentioned people lumping them all together.

AFAIK, there aren't any misogynists trying to infiltrate feminist groups. The article is titled "The Cancer In Occupy", after all.

Someone has never heard of free bleeding.

Hm, I think I've seen this use of the Socratic Method as a purely defensive tactic to fend off unwanted conversations before.

You have a rather... loose definition of infiltration. I don't think tricking people into doing gross things is necessarily infiltration.

On a side note, I just realized I had a gigantic brain fart regarding Dave's second question. Just to clear up any confusion: no, I'm not really concerned about misogynists discrediting feminism. Too bad I didn't realize that earlier. With that in mind, I also realize I could have been a little more forthcoming with my responses.

WHAT YOU TALKING BOUT, WILLIS?

Who are you? WEBSTER?

[Tolpuddle Martyr]

Webster, Waldo and Willis secretly control the World.

WWW should have tipped you off!

[The_Queen]

Sounds like handwringing to me. What are feminists, for instance, meant to do about misogynists delegitimizing their movement? What are/ were civil rights activists meant to do about Black Separatists?

Seems to me that the biggest problem they face is simple-minded or ill-intentioned people lumping them all together.

AFAIK, there aren't any misogynists trying to infiltrate feminist groups. The article is titled "The Cancer In Occupy", after all.

Someone has never heard of free bleeding.

Hm, I think I've seen this use of the Socratic Method as a purely defensive tactic to fend off unwanted conversations before.

You have a rather... loose definition of infiltration. I don't think tricking people into doing gross things is necessarily infiltration.

On a side note, I just realized I had a gigantic brain fart regarding Dave's second question. Just to clear up any confusion: no, I'm not really concerned about misogynists discrediting feminism. Too bad I didn't realize that earlier. With that in mind, I also realize I could have been a little more forthcoming with my responses.

WHAT YOU TALKING BOUT, WILLIS?

Who are you? WEBSTER?

Why do fools fall in love?

[davedan]

Sounds like handwringing to me. What are feminists, for instance, meant to do about misogynists delegitimizing their movement? What are/ were civil rights activists meant to do about Black Separatists?

Seems to me that the biggest problem they face is simple-minded or ill-intentioned people lumping them all together.

AFAIK, there aren't any misogynists trying to infiltrate feminist groups. The article is titled "The Cancer In Occupy", after all.

Someone has never heard of free bleeding.

Hm, I think I've seen this use of the Socratic Method as a purely defensive tactic to fend off unwanted conversations before.

You have a rather... loose definition of infiltration. I don't think tricking people into doing gross things is necessarily infiltration.

On a side note, I just realized I had a gigantic brain fart regarding Dave's second question. Just to clear up any confusion: no, I'm not really concerned about misogynists discrediting feminism. Too bad I didn't realize that earlier. With that in mind, I also realize I could have been a little more forthcoming with my responses.

WHAT YOU TALKING BOUT, WILLIS?

Who are you? WEBSTER?

Why do fools fall in love?

Why do fools rush in?

[Tolpuddle Martyr]

Sounds like handwringing to me. What are feminists, for instance, meant to do about misogynists delegitimizing their movement? What are/ were civil rights activists meant to do about Black Separatists?

Seems to me that the biggest problem they face is simple-minded or ill-intentioned people lumping them all together.

AFAIK, there aren't any misogynists trying to infiltrate feminist groups. The article is titled "The Cancer In Occupy", after all.

Someone has never heard of free bleeding.

Hm, I think I've seen this use of the Socratic Method as a purely defensive tactic to fend off unwanted conversations before.

You have a rather... loose definition of infiltration. I don't think tricking people into doing gross things is necessarily infiltration.

On a side note, I just realized I had a gigantic brain fart regarding Dave's second question. Just to clear up any confusion: no, I'm not really concerned about misogynists discrediting feminism. Too bad I didn't realize that earlier. With that in mind, I also realize I could have been a little more forthcoming with my responses.

WHAT YOU TALKING BOUT, WILLIS?

Who are you? WEBSTER?

Why do fools fall in love?

Why do fools rush in?

Why do we love the sea?

[The_Queen]

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EbTcHpPDCu8" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EbTcHpPDCu8</a>

[davedan]

Fuck I love that clip

[davedan]

Sounds like handwringing to me. What are feminists, for instance, meant to do about misogynists delegitimizing their movement? What are/ were civil rights activists meant to do about Black Separatists?

Seems to me that the biggest problem they face is simple-minded or ill-intentioned people lumping them all together.

AFAIK, there aren't any misogynists trying to infiltrate feminist groups. The article is titled "The Cancer In Occupy", after all.

Someone has never heard of free bleeding.

Hm, I think I've seen this use of the Socratic Method as a purely defensive tactic to fend off unwanted conversations before.

You have a rather... loose definition of infiltration. I don't think tricking people into doing gross things is necessarily infiltration.

On a side note, I just realized I had a gigantic brain fart regarding Dave's second question. Just to clear up any confusion: no, I'm not really concerned about misogynists discrediting feminism. Too bad I didn't realize that earlier. With that in mind, I also realize I could have been a little more forthcoming with my responses.

WHAT YOU TALKING BOUT, WILLIS?

Who are you? WEBSTER?

Why do fools fall in love?

Why do fools rush in?

Why do we love the sea?

You want the Truth?

[Tolpuddle Martyr]

I want the alternative truth!

[Art Vandelay]

Sounds like handwringing to me. What are feminists, for instance, meant to do about misogynists delegitimizing their movement? What are/ were civil rights activists meant to do about Black Separatists?

Seems to me that the biggest problem they face is simple-minded or ill-intentioned people lumping them all together.

AFAIK, there aren't any misogynists trying to infiltrate feminist groups. The article is titled "The Cancer In Occupy", after all.

Someone has never heard of free bleeding.

Hm, I think I've seen this use of the Socratic Method as a purely defensive tactic to fend off unwanted conversations before.

You have a rather... loose definition of infiltration. I don't think tricking people into doing gross things is necessarily infiltration.

On a side note, I just realized I had a gigantic brain fart regarding Dave's second question. Just to clear up any confusion: no, I'm not really concerned about misogynists discrediting feminism. Too bad I didn't realize that earlier. With that in mind, I also realize I could have been a little more forthcoming with my responses.

WHAT YOU TALKING BOUT, WILLIS?

Who are you? WEBSTER?

Why do fools fall in love?

Why do fools rush in?

Why do we love the sea?

You want the Truth?

Why do birds suddenly appear?

[Tolpuddle Martyr]

Sounds like handwringing to me. What are feminists, for instance, meant to do about misogynists delegitimizing their movement? What are/ were civil rights activists meant to do about Black Separatists?

Seems to me that the biggest problem they face is simple-minded or ill-intentioned people lumping them all together.

AFAIK, there aren't any misogynists trying to infiltrate feminist groups. The article is titled "The Cancer In Occupy", after all.

Someone has never heard of free bleeding.

Hm, I think I've seen this use of the Socratic Method as a purely defensive tactic to fend off unwanted conversations before.

You have a rather... loose definition of infiltration. I don't think tricking people into doing gross things is necessarily infiltration.

On a side note, I just realized I had a gigantic brain fart regarding Dave's second question. Just to clear up any confusion: no, I'm not really concerned about misogynists discrediting feminism. Too bad I didn't realize that earlier. With that in mind, I also realize I could have been a little more forthcoming with my responses.

WHAT YOU TALKING BOUT, WILLIS?

Who are you? WEBSTER?

Why do fools fall in love?

Why do fools rush in?

Why do we love the sea?

You want the Truth?

Why do birds suddenly appear?

Why did the chicken cross the road?

[ironbite]

Sounds like handwringing to me. What are feminists, for instance, meant to do about misogynists delegitimizing their movement? What are/ were civil rights activists meant to do about Black Separatists?

Seems to me that the biggest problem they face is simple-minded or ill-intentioned people lumping them all together.

AFAIK, there aren't any misogynists trying to infiltrate feminist groups. The article is titled "The Cancer In Occupy", after all.

Someone has never heard of free bleeding.

Hm, I think I've seen this use of the Socratic Method as a purely defensive tactic to fend off unwanted conversations before.

You have a rather... loose definition of infiltration. I don't think tricking people into doing gross things is necessarily infiltration.

On a side note, I just realized I had a gigantic brain fart regarding Dave's second question. Just to clear up any confusion: no, I'm not really concerned about misogynists discrediting feminism. Too bad I didn't realize that earlier. With that in mind, I also realize I could have been a little more forthcoming with my responses.

WHAT YOU TALKING BOUT, WILLIS?

Who are you? WEBSTER?

Why do fools fall in love?

Why do fools rush in?

Why do we love the sea?

You want the Truth?

Why do birds suddenly appear?

Why did the chicken cross the road?

Why does anything we do matter?

[davedan]

Sounds like handwringing to me. What are feminists, for instance, meant to do about misogynists delegitimizing their movement? What are/ were civil rights activists meant to do about Black Separatists?

Seems to me that the biggest problem they face is simple-minded or ill-intentioned people lumping them all together.

AFAIK, there aren't any misogynists trying to infiltrate feminist groups. The article is titled "The Cancer In Occupy", after all.

Someone has never heard of free bleeding.

Hm, I think I've seen this use of the Socratic Method as a purely defensive tactic to fend off unwanted conversations before.

You have a rather... loose definition of infiltration. I don't think tricking people into doing gross things is necessarily infiltration.

On a side note, I just realized I had a gigantic brain fart regarding Dave's second question. Just to clear up any confusion: no, I'm not really concerned about misogynists discrediting feminism. Too bad I didn't realize that earlier. With that in mind, I also realize I could have been a little more forthcoming with my responses.

WHAT YOU TALKING BOUT, WILLIS?

Who are you? WEBSTER?

Why do fools fall in love?

Why do fools rush in?

Why do we love the sea?

You want the Truth?

Why do birds suddenly appear?

Why did the chicken cross the road?

Why does anything we do matter?

Is that you, mother?

[dpareja]

Sounds like handwringing to me. What are feminists, for instance, meant to do about misogynists delegitimizing their movement? What are/ were civil rights activists meant to do about Black Separatists?

Seems to me that the biggest problem they face is simple-minded or ill-intentioned people lumping them all together.

AFAIK, there aren't any misogynists trying to infiltrate feminist groups. The article is titled "The Cancer In Occupy", after all.

Someone has never heard of free bleeding.

Hm, I think I've seen this use of the Socratic Method as a purely defensive tactic to fend off unwanted conversations before.

You have a rather... loose definition of infiltration. I don't think tricking people into doing gross things is necessarily infiltration.

On a side note, I just realized I had a gigantic brain fart regarding Dave's second question. Just to clear up any confusion: no, I'm not really concerned about misogynists discrediting feminism. Too bad I didn't realize that earlier. With that in mind, I also realize I could have been a little more forthcoming with my responses.

WHAT YOU TALKING BOUT, WILLIS?

Who are you? WEBSTER?

Why do fools fall in love?

Why do fools rush in?

Why do we love the sea?

You want the Truth?

Why do birds suddenly appear?

Why did the chicken cross the road?

Why does anything we do matter?

Is that you, mother?

Are you there, God? It's me, Margaret.