0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: davedan on February 14, 2017, 04:22:00 pmQuote from: ironbite on February 14, 2017, 03:51:10 pmQuote from: Tolpuddle Martyr on February 14, 2017, 04:22:56 amQuote from: Art Vandelay on February 14, 2017, 03:54:10 amQuote from: davedan on February 14, 2017, 02:22:37 amQuote from: Tolpuddle Martyr on February 14, 2017, 01:50:11 amQuote from: davedan on February 14, 2017, 01:43:00 amQuote from: The_Queen on February 14, 2017, 01:42:10 amQuote from: davedan on February 14, 2017, 01:39:28 amQuote from: The_Queen on February 14, 2017, 01:20:56 amQuote from: Lana Reverse on February 14, 2017, 01:00:15 amQuote from: Tolpuddle Martyr on February 13, 2017, 11:42:20 pmQuote from: Lana Reverse on February 13, 2017, 10:18:15 pmQuote from: davedan on February 13, 2017, 05:42:29 pmSounds like handwringing to me. What are feminists, for instance, meant to do about misogynists delegitimizing their movement? What are/ were civil rights activists meant to do about Black Separatists?Seems to me that the biggest problem they face is simple-minded or ill-intentioned people lumping them all together.AFAIK, there aren't any misogynists trying to infiltrate feminist groups. The article is titled "The Cancer In Occupy", after all.Someone has never heard of free bleeding.Hm, I think I've seen this use of the Socratic Method as a purely defensive tactic to fend off unwanted conversations before.You have a rather... loose definition of infiltration. I don't think tricking people into doing gross things is necessarily infiltration.On a side note, I just realized I had a gigantic brain fart regarding Dave's second question. Just to clear up any confusion: no, I'm not really concerned about misogynists discrediting feminism. Too bad I didn't realize that earlier. With that in mind, I also realize I could have been a little more forthcoming with my responses.WHAT YOU TALKING BOUT, WILLIS?Who are you? WEBSTER?Why do fools fall in love?Why do fools rush in?Why do we love the sea?You want the Truth?Why do birds suddenly appear?Why did the chicken cross the road?Why does anything we do matter?Is that you, mother?Are you there, God? It's me, Margaret.
Quote from: ironbite on February 14, 2017, 03:51:10 pmQuote from: Tolpuddle Martyr on February 14, 2017, 04:22:56 amQuote from: Art Vandelay on February 14, 2017, 03:54:10 amQuote from: davedan on February 14, 2017, 02:22:37 amQuote from: Tolpuddle Martyr on February 14, 2017, 01:50:11 amQuote from: davedan on February 14, 2017, 01:43:00 amQuote from: The_Queen on February 14, 2017, 01:42:10 amQuote from: davedan on February 14, 2017, 01:39:28 amQuote from: The_Queen on February 14, 2017, 01:20:56 amQuote from: Lana Reverse on February 14, 2017, 01:00:15 amQuote from: Tolpuddle Martyr on February 13, 2017, 11:42:20 pmQuote from: Lana Reverse on February 13, 2017, 10:18:15 pmQuote from: davedan on February 13, 2017, 05:42:29 pmSounds like handwringing to me. What are feminists, for instance, meant to do about misogynists delegitimizing their movement? What are/ were civil rights activists meant to do about Black Separatists?Seems to me that the biggest problem they face is simple-minded or ill-intentioned people lumping them all together.AFAIK, there aren't any misogynists trying to infiltrate feminist groups. The article is titled "The Cancer In Occupy", after all.Someone has never heard of free bleeding.Hm, I think I've seen this use of the Socratic Method as a purely defensive tactic to fend off unwanted conversations before.You have a rather... loose definition of infiltration. I don't think tricking people into doing gross things is necessarily infiltration.On a side note, I just realized I had a gigantic brain fart regarding Dave's second question. Just to clear up any confusion: no, I'm not really concerned about misogynists discrediting feminism. Too bad I didn't realize that earlier. With that in mind, I also realize I could have been a little more forthcoming with my responses.WHAT YOU TALKING BOUT, WILLIS?Who are you? WEBSTER?Why do fools fall in love?Why do fools rush in?Why do we love the sea?You want the Truth?Why do birds suddenly appear?Why did the chicken cross the road?Why does anything we do matter?Is that you, mother?
Quote from: Tolpuddle Martyr on February 14, 2017, 04:22:56 amQuote from: Art Vandelay on February 14, 2017, 03:54:10 amQuote from: davedan on February 14, 2017, 02:22:37 amQuote from: Tolpuddle Martyr on February 14, 2017, 01:50:11 amQuote from: davedan on February 14, 2017, 01:43:00 amQuote from: The_Queen on February 14, 2017, 01:42:10 amQuote from: davedan on February 14, 2017, 01:39:28 amQuote from: The_Queen on February 14, 2017, 01:20:56 amQuote from: Lana Reverse on February 14, 2017, 01:00:15 amQuote from: Tolpuddle Martyr on February 13, 2017, 11:42:20 pmQuote from: Lana Reverse on February 13, 2017, 10:18:15 pmQuote from: davedan on February 13, 2017, 05:42:29 pmSounds like handwringing to me. What are feminists, for instance, meant to do about misogynists delegitimizing their movement? What are/ were civil rights activists meant to do about Black Separatists?Seems to me that the biggest problem they face is simple-minded or ill-intentioned people lumping them all together.AFAIK, there aren't any misogynists trying to infiltrate feminist groups. The article is titled "The Cancer In Occupy", after all.Someone has never heard of free bleeding.Hm, I think I've seen this use of the Socratic Method as a purely defensive tactic to fend off unwanted conversations before.You have a rather... loose definition of infiltration. I don't think tricking people into doing gross things is necessarily infiltration.On a side note, I just realized I had a gigantic brain fart regarding Dave's second question. Just to clear up any confusion: no, I'm not really concerned about misogynists discrediting feminism. Too bad I didn't realize that earlier. With that in mind, I also realize I could have been a little more forthcoming with my responses.WHAT YOU TALKING BOUT, WILLIS?Who are you? WEBSTER?Why do fools fall in love?Why do fools rush in?Why do we love the sea?You want the Truth?Why do birds suddenly appear?Why did the chicken cross the road?Why does anything we do matter?
Quote from: Art Vandelay on February 14, 2017, 03:54:10 amQuote from: davedan on February 14, 2017, 02:22:37 amQuote from: Tolpuddle Martyr on February 14, 2017, 01:50:11 amQuote from: davedan on February 14, 2017, 01:43:00 amQuote from: The_Queen on February 14, 2017, 01:42:10 amQuote from: davedan on February 14, 2017, 01:39:28 amQuote from: The_Queen on February 14, 2017, 01:20:56 amQuote from: Lana Reverse on February 14, 2017, 01:00:15 amQuote from: Tolpuddle Martyr on February 13, 2017, 11:42:20 pmQuote from: Lana Reverse on February 13, 2017, 10:18:15 pmQuote from: davedan on February 13, 2017, 05:42:29 pmSounds like handwringing to me. What are feminists, for instance, meant to do about misogynists delegitimizing their movement? What are/ were civil rights activists meant to do about Black Separatists?Seems to me that the biggest problem they face is simple-minded or ill-intentioned people lumping them all together.AFAIK, there aren't any misogynists trying to infiltrate feminist groups. The article is titled "The Cancer In Occupy", after all.Someone has never heard of free bleeding.Hm, I think I've seen this use of the Socratic Method as a purely defensive tactic to fend off unwanted conversations before.You have a rather... loose definition of infiltration. I don't think tricking people into doing gross things is necessarily infiltration.On a side note, I just realized I had a gigantic brain fart regarding Dave's second question. Just to clear up any confusion: no, I'm not really concerned about misogynists discrediting feminism. Too bad I didn't realize that earlier. With that in mind, I also realize I could have been a little more forthcoming with my responses.WHAT YOU TALKING BOUT, WILLIS?Who are you? WEBSTER?Why do fools fall in love?Why do fools rush in?Why do we love the sea?You want the Truth?Why do birds suddenly appear?Why did the chicken cross the road?
Quote from: davedan on February 14, 2017, 02:22:37 amQuote from: Tolpuddle Martyr on February 14, 2017, 01:50:11 amQuote from: davedan on February 14, 2017, 01:43:00 amQuote from: The_Queen on February 14, 2017, 01:42:10 amQuote from: davedan on February 14, 2017, 01:39:28 amQuote from: The_Queen on February 14, 2017, 01:20:56 amQuote from: Lana Reverse on February 14, 2017, 01:00:15 amQuote from: Tolpuddle Martyr on February 13, 2017, 11:42:20 pmQuote from: Lana Reverse on February 13, 2017, 10:18:15 pmQuote from: davedan on February 13, 2017, 05:42:29 pmSounds like handwringing to me. What are feminists, for instance, meant to do about misogynists delegitimizing their movement? What are/ were civil rights activists meant to do about Black Separatists?Seems to me that the biggest problem they face is simple-minded or ill-intentioned people lumping them all together.AFAIK, there aren't any misogynists trying to infiltrate feminist groups. The article is titled "The Cancer In Occupy", after all.Someone has never heard of free bleeding.Hm, I think I've seen this use of the Socratic Method as a purely defensive tactic to fend off unwanted conversations before.You have a rather... loose definition of infiltration. I don't think tricking people into doing gross things is necessarily infiltration.On a side note, I just realized I had a gigantic brain fart regarding Dave's second question. Just to clear up any confusion: no, I'm not really concerned about misogynists discrediting feminism. Too bad I didn't realize that earlier. With that in mind, I also realize I could have been a little more forthcoming with my responses.WHAT YOU TALKING BOUT, WILLIS?Who are you? WEBSTER?Why do fools fall in love?Why do fools rush in?Why do we love the sea?You want the Truth?Why do birds suddenly appear?
Quote from: Tolpuddle Martyr on February 14, 2017, 01:50:11 amQuote from: davedan on February 14, 2017, 01:43:00 amQuote from: The_Queen on February 14, 2017, 01:42:10 amQuote from: davedan on February 14, 2017, 01:39:28 amQuote from: The_Queen on February 14, 2017, 01:20:56 amQuote from: Lana Reverse on February 14, 2017, 01:00:15 amQuote from: Tolpuddle Martyr on February 13, 2017, 11:42:20 pmQuote from: Lana Reverse on February 13, 2017, 10:18:15 pmQuote from: davedan on February 13, 2017, 05:42:29 pmSounds like handwringing to me. What are feminists, for instance, meant to do about misogynists delegitimizing their movement? What are/ were civil rights activists meant to do about Black Separatists?Seems to me that the biggest problem they face is simple-minded or ill-intentioned people lumping them all together.AFAIK, there aren't any misogynists trying to infiltrate feminist groups. The article is titled "The Cancer In Occupy", after all.Someone has never heard of free bleeding.Hm, I think I've seen this use of the Socratic Method as a purely defensive tactic to fend off unwanted conversations before.You have a rather... loose definition of infiltration. I don't think tricking people into doing gross things is necessarily infiltration.On a side note, I just realized I had a gigantic brain fart regarding Dave's second question. Just to clear up any confusion: no, I'm not really concerned about misogynists discrediting feminism. Too bad I didn't realize that earlier. With that in mind, I also realize I could have been a little more forthcoming with my responses.WHAT YOU TALKING BOUT, WILLIS?Who are you? WEBSTER?Why do fools fall in love?Why do fools rush in?Why do we love the sea?You want the Truth?
Quote from: davedan on February 14, 2017, 01:43:00 amQuote from: The_Queen on February 14, 2017, 01:42:10 amQuote from: davedan on February 14, 2017, 01:39:28 amQuote from: The_Queen on February 14, 2017, 01:20:56 amQuote from: Lana Reverse on February 14, 2017, 01:00:15 amQuote from: Tolpuddle Martyr on February 13, 2017, 11:42:20 pmQuote from: Lana Reverse on February 13, 2017, 10:18:15 pmQuote from: davedan on February 13, 2017, 05:42:29 pmSounds like handwringing to me. What are feminists, for instance, meant to do about misogynists delegitimizing their movement? What are/ were civil rights activists meant to do about Black Separatists?Seems to me that the biggest problem they face is simple-minded or ill-intentioned people lumping them all together.AFAIK, there aren't any misogynists trying to infiltrate feminist groups. The article is titled "The Cancer In Occupy", after all.Someone has never heard of free bleeding.Hm, I think I've seen this use of the Socratic Method as a purely defensive tactic to fend off unwanted conversations before.You have a rather... loose definition of infiltration. I don't think tricking people into doing gross things is necessarily infiltration.On a side note, I just realized I had a gigantic brain fart regarding Dave's second question. Just to clear up any confusion: no, I'm not really concerned about misogynists discrediting feminism. Too bad I didn't realize that earlier. With that in mind, I also realize I could have been a little more forthcoming with my responses.WHAT YOU TALKING BOUT, WILLIS?Who are you? WEBSTER?Why do fools fall in love?Why do fools rush in?Why do we love the sea?
Quote from: The_Queen on February 14, 2017, 01:42:10 amQuote from: davedan on February 14, 2017, 01:39:28 amQuote from: The_Queen on February 14, 2017, 01:20:56 amQuote from: Lana Reverse on February 14, 2017, 01:00:15 amQuote from: Tolpuddle Martyr on February 13, 2017, 11:42:20 pmQuote from: Lana Reverse on February 13, 2017, 10:18:15 pmQuote from: davedan on February 13, 2017, 05:42:29 pmSounds like handwringing to me. What are feminists, for instance, meant to do about misogynists delegitimizing their movement? What are/ were civil rights activists meant to do about Black Separatists?Seems to me that the biggest problem they face is simple-minded or ill-intentioned people lumping them all together.AFAIK, there aren't any misogynists trying to infiltrate feminist groups. The article is titled "The Cancer In Occupy", after all.Someone has never heard of free bleeding.Hm, I think I've seen this use of the Socratic Method as a purely defensive tactic to fend off unwanted conversations before.You have a rather... loose definition of infiltration. I don't think tricking people into doing gross things is necessarily infiltration.On a side note, I just realized I had a gigantic brain fart regarding Dave's second question. Just to clear up any confusion: no, I'm not really concerned about misogynists discrediting feminism. Too bad I didn't realize that earlier. With that in mind, I also realize I could have been a little more forthcoming with my responses.WHAT YOU TALKING BOUT, WILLIS?Who are you? WEBSTER?Why do fools fall in love?Why do fools rush in?
Quote from: davedan on February 14, 2017, 01:39:28 amQuote from: The_Queen on February 14, 2017, 01:20:56 amQuote from: Lana Reverse on February 14, 2017, 01:00:15 amQuote from: Tolpuddle Martyr on February 13, 2017, 11:42:20 pmQuote from: Lana Reverse on February 13, 2017, 10:18:15 pmQuote from: davedan on February 13, 2017, 05:42:29 pmSounds like handwringing to me. What are feminists, for instance, meant to do about misogynists delegitimizing their movement? What are/ were civil rights activists meant to do about Black Separatists?Seems to me that the biggest problem they face is simple-minded or ill-intentioned people lumping them all together.AFAIK, there aren't any misogynists trying to infiltrate feminist groups. The article is titled "The Cancer In Occupy", after all.Someone has never heard of free bleeding.Hm, I think I've seen this use of the Socratic Method as a purely defensive tactic to fend off unwanted conversations before.You have a rather... loose definition of infiltration. I don't think tricking people into doing gross things is necessarily infiltration.On a side note, I just realized I had a gigantic brain fart regarding Dave's second question. Just to clear up any confusion: no, I'm not really concerned about misogynists discrediting feminism. Too bad I didn't realize that earlier. With that in mind, I also realize I could have been a little more forthcoming with my responses.WHAT YOU TALKING BOUT, WILLIS?Who are you? WEBSTER?Why do fools fall in love?
Quote from: The_Queen on February 14, 2017, 01:20:56 amQuote from: Lana Reverse on February 14, 2017, 01:00:15 amQuote from: Tolpuddle Martyr on February 13, 2017, 11:42:20 pmQuote from: Lana Reverse on February 13, 2017, 10:18:15 pmQuote from: davedan on February 13, 2017, 05:42:29 pmSounds like handwringing to me. What are feminists, for instance, meant to do about misogynists delegitimizing their movement? What are/ were civil rights activists meant to do about Black Separatists?Seems to me that the biggest problem they face is simple-minded or ill-intentioned people lumping them all together.AFAIK, there aren't any misogynists trying to infiltrate feminist groups. The article is titled "The Cancer In Occupy", after all.Someone has never heard of free bleeding.Hm, I think I've seen this use of the Socratic Method as a purely defensive tactic to fend off unwanted conversations before.You have a rather... loose definition of infiltration. I don't think tricking people into doing gross things is necessarily infiltration.On a side note, I just realized I had a gigantic brain fart regarding Dave's second question. Just to clear up any confusion: no, I'm not really concerned about misogynists discrediting feminism. Too bad I didn't realize that earlier. With that in mind, I also realize I could have been a little more forthcoming with my responses.WHAT YOU TALKING BOUT, WILLIS?Who are you? WEBSTER?
Quote from: Lana Reverse on February 14, 2017, 01:00:15 amQuote from: Tolpuddle Martyr on February 13, 2017, 11:42:20 pmQuote from: Lana Reverse on February 13, 2017, 10:18:15 pmQuote from: davedan on February 13, 2017, 05:42:29 pmSounds like handwringing to me. What are feminists, for instance, meant to do about misogynists delegitimizing their movement? What are/ were civil rights activists meant to do about Black Separatists?Seems to me that the biggest problem they face is simple-minded or ill-intentioned people lumping them all together.AFAIK, there aren't any misogynists trying to infiltrate feminist groups. The article is titled "The Cancer In Occupy", after all.Someone has never heard of free bleeding.Hm, I think I've seen this use of the Socratic Method as a purely defensive tactic to fend off unwanted conversations before.You have a rather... loose definition of infiltration. I don't think tricking people into doing gross things is necessarily infiltration.On a side note, I just realized I had a gigantic brain fart regarding Dave's second question. Just to clear up any confusion: no, I'm not really concerned about misogynists discrediting feminism. Too bad I didn't realize that earlier. With that in mind, I also realize I could have been a little more forthcoming with my responses.WHAT YOU TALKING BOUT, WILLIS?
Quote from: Tolpuddle Martyr on February 13, 2017, 11:42:20 pmQuote from: Lana Reverse on February 13, 2017, 10:18:15 pmQuote from: davedan on February 13, 2017, 05:42:29 pmSounds like handwringing to me. What are feminists, for instance, meant to do about misogynists delegitimizing their movement? What are/ were civil rights activists meant to do about Black Separatists?Seems to me that the biggest problem they face is simple-minded or ill-intentioned people lumping them all together.AFAIK, there aren't any misogynists trying to infiltrate feminist groups. The article is titled "The Cancer In Occupy", after all.Someone has never heard of free bleeding.Hm, I think I've seen this use of the Socratic Method as a purely defensive tactic to fend off unwanted conversations before.You have a rather... loose definition of infiltration. I don't think tricking people into doing gross things is necessarily infiltration.On a side note, I just realized I had a gigantic brain fart regarding Dave's second question. Just to clear up any confusion: no, I'm not really concerned about misogynists discrediting feminism. Too bad I didn't realize that earlier. With that in mind, I also realize I could have been a little more forthcoming with my responses.
Quote from: Lana Reverse on February 13, 2017, 10:18:15 pmQuote from: davedan on February 13, 2017, 05:42:29 pmSounds like handwringing to me. What are feminists, for instance, meant to do about misogynists delegitimizing their movement? What are/ were civil rights activists meant to do about Black Separatists?Seems to me that the biggest problem they face is simple-minded or ill-intentioned people lumping them all together.AFAIK, there aren't any misogynists trying to infiltrate feminist groups. The article is titled "The Cancer In Occupy", after all.Someone has never heard of free bleeding.Hm, I think I've seen this use of the Socratic Method as a purely defensive tactic to fend off unwanted conversations before.
Quote from: davedan on February 13, 2017, 05:42:29 pmSounds like handwringing to me. What are feminists, for instance, meant to do about misogynists delegitimizing their movement? What are/ were civil rights activists meant to do about Black Separatists?Seems to me that the biggest problem they face is simple-minded or ill-intentioned people lumping them all together.AFAIK, there aren't any misogynists trying to infiltrate feminist groups. The article is titled "The Cancer In Occupy", after all.
Sounds like handwringing to me. What are feminists, for instance, meant to do about misogynists delegitimizing their movement? What are/ were civil rights activists meant to do about Black Separatists?Seems to me that the biggest problem they face is simple-minded or ill-intentioned people lumping them all together.
Quote from: dpareja on February 14, 2017, 04:31:09 pmQuote from: davedan on February 14, 2017, 04:22:00 pmQuote from: ironbite on February 14, 2017, 03:51:10 pmQuote from: Tolpuddle Martyr on February 14, 2017, 04:22:56 amQuote from: Art Vandelay on February 14, 2017, 03:54:10 amQuote from: davedan on February 14, 2017, 02:22:37 amQuote from: Tolpuddle Martyr on February 14, 2017, 01:50:11 amQuote from: davedan on February 14, 2017, 01:43:00 amQuote from: The_Queen on February 14, 2017, 01:42:10 amQuote from: davedan on February 14, 2017, 01:39:28 amQuote from: The_Queen on February 14, 2017, 01:20:56 amQuote from: Lana Reverse on February 14, 2017, 01:00:15 amQuote from: Tolpuddle Martyr on February 13, 2017, 11:42:20 pmQuote from: Lana Reverse on February 13, 2017, 10:18:15 pmQuote from: davedan on February 13, 2017, 05:42:29 pmSounds like handwringing to me. What are feminists, for instance, meant to do about misogynists delegitimizing their movement? What are/ were civil rights activists meant to do about Black Separatists?Seems to me that the biggest problem they face is simple-minded or ill-intentioned people lumping them all together.AFAIK, there aren't any misogynists trying to infiltrate feminist groups. The article is titled "The Cancer In Occupy", after all.Someone has never heard of free bleeding.Hm, I think I've seen this use of the Socratic Method as a purely defensive tactic to fend off unwanted conversations before.You have a rather... loose definition of infiltration. I don't think tricking people into doing gross things is necessarily infiltration.On a side note, I just realized I had a gigantic brain fart regarding Dave's second question. Just to clear up any confusion: no, I'm not really concerned about misogynists discrediting feminism. Too bad I didn't realize that earlier. With that in mind, I also realize I could have been a little more forthcoming with my responses.WHAT YOU TALKING BOUT, WILLIS?Who are you? WEBSTER?Why do fools fall in love?Why do fools rush in?Why do we love the sea?You want the Truth?Why do birds suddenly appear?Why did the chicken cross the road?Why does anything we do matter?Is that you, mother?Are you there, God? It's me, Margaret.What becomes of the broken hearted?
Does anyone take Donald Trump seriously, anymore?
Quote from: davedan on February 14, 2017, 04:54:54 pmQuote from: dpareja on February 14, 2017, 04:31:09 pmQuote from: davedan on February 14, 2017, 04:22:00 pmQuote from: ironbite on February 14, 2017, 03:51:10 pmQuote from: Tolpuddle Martyr on February 14, 2017, 04:22:56 amQuote from: Art Vandelay on February 14, 2017, 03:54:10 amQuote from: davedan on February 14, 2017, 02:22:37 amQuote from: Tolpuddle Martyr on February 14, 2017, 01:50:11 amQuote from: davedan on February 14, 2017, 01:43:00 amQuote from: The_Queen on February 14, 2017, 01:42:10 amQuote from: davedan on February 14, 2017, 01:39:28 amQuote from: The_Queen on February 14, 2017, 01:20:56 amQuote from: Lana Reverse on February 14, 2017, 01:00:15 amQuote from: Tolpuddle Martyr on February 13, 2017, 11:42:20 pmQuote from: Lana Reverse on February 13, 2017, 10:18:15 pmQuote from: davedan on February 13, 2017, 05:42:29 pmSounds like handwringing to me. What are feminists, for instance, meant to do about misogynists delegitimizing their movement? What are/ were civil rights activists meant to do about Black Separatists?Seems to me that the biggest problem they face is simple-minded or ill-intentioned people lumping them all together.AFAIK, there aren't any misogynists trying to infiltrate feminist groups. The article is titled "The Cancer In Occupy", after all.Someone has never heard of free bleeding.Hm, I think I've seen this use of the Socratic Method as a purely defensive tactic to fend off unwanted conversations before.You have a rather... loose definition of infiltration. I don't think tricking people into doing gross things is necessarily infiltration.On a side note, I just realized I had a gigantic brain fart regarding Dave's second question. Just to clear up any confusion: no, I'm not really concerned about misogynists discrediting feminism. Too bad I didn't realize that earlier. With that in mind, I also realize I could have been a little more forthcoming with my responses.WHAT YOU TALKING BOUT, WILLIS?Who are you? WEBSTER?Why do fools fall in love?Why do fools rush in?Why do we love the sea?You want the Truth?Why do birds suddenly appear?Why did the chicken cross the road?Why does anything we do matter?Is that you, mother?Are you there, God? It's me, Margaret.What becomes of the broken hearted?What is the meaning of life?
Quote from: The_Queen on February 14, 2017, 05:53:28 pmQuote from: davedan on February 14, 2017, 04:54:54 pmQuote from: dpareja on February 14, 2017, 04:31:09 pmQuote from: davedan on February 14, 2017, 04:22:00 pmQuote from: ironbite on February 14, 2017, 03:51:10 pmQuote from: Tolpuddle Martyr on February 14, 2017, 04:22:56 amQuote from: Art Vandelay on February 14, 2017, 03:54:10 amQuote from: davedan on February 14, 2017, 02:22:37 amQuote from: Tolpuddle Martyr on February 14, 2017, 01:50:11 amQuote from: davedan on February 14, 2017, 01:43:00 amQuote from: The_Queen on February 14, 2017, 01:42:10 amQuote from: davedan on February 14, 2017, 01:39:28 amQuote from: The_Queen on February 14, 2017, 01:20:56 amQuote from: Lana Reverse on February 14, 2017, 01:00:15 amQuote from: Tolpuddle Martyr on February 13, 2017, 11:42:20 pmQuote from: Lana Reverse on February 13, 2017, 10:18:15 pmQuote from: davedan on February 13, 2017, 05:42:29 pmSounds like handwringing to me. What are feminists, for instance, meant to do about misogynists delegitimizing their movement? What are/ were civil rights activists meant to do about Black Separatists?Seems to me that the biggest problem they face is simple-minded or ill-intentioned people lumping them all together.AFAIK, there aren't any misogynists trying to infiltrate feminist groups. The article is titled "The Cancer In Occupy", after all.Someone has never heard of free bleeding.Hm, I think I've seen this use of the Socratic Method as a purely defensive tactic to fend off unwanted conversations before.You have a rather... loose definition of infiltration. I don't think tricking people into doing gross things is necessarily infiltration.On a side note, I just realized I had a gigantic brain fart regarding Dave's second question. Just to clear up any confusion: no, I'm not really concerned about misogynists discrediting feminism. Too bad I didn't realize that earlier. With that in mind, I also realize I could have been a little more forthcoming with my responses.WHAT YOU TALKING BOUT, WILLIS?Who are you? WEBSTER?Why do fools fall in love?Why do fools rush in?Why do we love the sea?You want the Truth?Why do birds suddenly appear?Why did the chicken cross the road?Why does anything we do matter?Is that you, mother?Are you there, God? It's me, Margaret.What becomes of the broken hearted?What is the meaning of life?Why do doves cry?
Quote from: davedan on February 14, 2017, 05:57:11 pmQuote from: The_Queen on February 14, 2017, 05:53:28 pmQuote from: davedan on February 14, 2017, 04:54:54 pmQuote from: dpareja on February 14, 2017, 04:31:09 pmQuote from: davedan on February 14, 2017, 04:22:00 pmQuote from: ironbite on February 14, 2017, 03:51:10 pmQuote from: Tolpuddle Martyr on February 14, 2017, 04:22:56 amQuote from: Art Vandelay on February 14, 2017, 03:54:10 amQuote from: davedan on February 14, 2017, 02:22:37 amQuote from: Tolpuddle Martyr on February 14, 2017, 01:50:11 amQuote from: davedan on February 14, 2017, 01:43:00 amQuote from: The_Queen on February 14, 2017, 01:42:10 amQuote from: davedan on February 14, 2017, 01:39:28 amQuote from: The_Queen on February 14, 2017, 01:20:56 amQuote from: Lana Reverse on February 14, 2017, 01:00:15 amQuote from: Tolpuddle Martyr on February 13, 2017, 11:42:20 pmQuote from: Lana Reverse on February 13, 2017, 10:18:15 pmQuote from: davedan on February 13, 2017, 05:42:29 pmSounds like handwringing to me. What are feminists, for instance, meant to do about misogynists delegitimizing their movement? What are/ were civil rights activists meant to do about Black Separatists?Seems to me that the biggest problem they face is simple-minded or ill-intentioned people lumping them all together.AFAIK, there aren't any misogynists trying to infiltrate feminist groups. The article is titled "The Cancer In Occupy", after all.Someone has never heard of free bleeding.Hm, I think I've seen this use of the Socratic Method as a purely defensive tactic to fend off unwanted conversations before.You have a rather... loose definition of infiltration. I don't think tricking people into doing gross things is necessarily infiltration.On a side note, I just realized I had a gigantic brain fart regarding Dave's second question. Just to clear up any confusion: no, I'm not really concerned about misogynists discrediting feminism. Too bad I didn't realize that earlier. With that in mind, I also realize I could have been a little more forthcoming with my responses.WHAT YOU TALKING BOUT, WILLIS?Who are you? WEBSTER?Why do fools fall in love?Why do fools rush in?Why do we love the sea?You want the Truth?Why do birds suddenly appear?Why did the chicken cross the road?Why does anything we do matter?Is that you, mother?Are you there, God? It's me, Margaret.What becomes of the broken hearted?What is the meaning of life?Why do doves cry?How high does the sycamore grow?
Life for the sake of life means nothing.
What is the sound of me using Nair on my balls?
What is the sound of one hand clapping?
Quote from: RavynousHunter on February 14, 2017, 08:59:49 pmWhat is the sound of me using Nair on my balls?Ow.
Quote from: Tolpuddle Martyr on February 14, 2017, 09:35:19 pmQuote from: RavynousHunter on February 14, 2017, 08:59:49 pmWhat is the sound of me using Nair on my balls?Ow.Would you turtle wax them after they are silky smooth?
Quote from: davedan on February 14, 2017, 11:34:13 pmQuote from: Tolpuddle Martyr on February 14, 2017, 09:35:19 pmQuote from: RavynousHunter on February 14, 2017, 08:59:49 pmWhat is the sound of me using Nair on my balls?Ow.Would you turtle wax them after they are silky smooth?Of course. Gotta keep that nice, shiny sheen, after all. If I can't whip my balls out in broad daylight and risk blinding passersby, what's the point?
Quote from: RavynousHunter on February 15, 2017, 12:24:42 amQuote from: davedan on February 14, 2017, 11:34:13 pmQuote from: Tolpuddle Martyr on February 14, 2017, 09:35:19 pmQuote from: RavynousHunter on February 14, 2017, 08:59:49 pmWhat is the sound of me using Nair on my balls?Ow.Would you turtle wax them after they are silky smooth?Of course. Gotta keep that nice, shiny sheen, after all. If I can't whip my balls out in broad daylight and risk blinding passersby, what's the point? Self-proclaimed "pro balls" people use bollock-hurty tactics to unsilence people they don't like. Irony completely lost.
Quote from: Tolpuddle Martyr on February 15, 2017, 12:46:08 amQuote from: RavynousHunter on February 15, 2017, 12:24:42 amQuote from: davedan on February 14, 2017, 11:34:13 pmQuote from: Tolpuddle Martyr on February 14, 2017, 09:35:19 pmQuote from: RavynousHunter on February 14, 2017, 08:59:49 pmWhat is the sound of me using Nair on my balls?Ow.Would you turtle wax them after they are silky smooth?Of course. Gotta keep that nice, shiny sheen, after all. If I can't whip my balls out in broad daylight and risk blinding passersby, what's the point? Self-proclaimed "pro balls" people use bollock-hurty tactics to unsilence people they don't like. Irony completely lost.Look I'm scared. I'm worried that the anitba are going to undermine the ballista movement
No matter what happens, no matter what my last words may end up being, I want everyone to claim that they were: "If you strike me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine."
Aww, you guys rock. I feel the love... and the pitchforks and torches. Tingly!