FSTDT Forums

Rubbish => Preaching and Worship => Topic started by: Jacob Harrison on May 09, 2018, 07:48:41 pm

Title: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: Jacob Harrison on May 09, 2018, 07:48:41 pm
Hello, I am Jacob Harrison. On Fstdt.com, I promoted Roman Catholicism. I left the site when I had to take care of mental health problems but now I am better and something significant happened recently, that I felt was important to post. However I discovered that the site is down. I  typed out what I am going to comment when the site is back up. However, it is taking so long that I lost my patience so I am going to post it here.

“Hi guys I am back. My medication for my mental health is helping and I am feeling a lot better. But there is something extremely important to tell you.

I AM NO LONGER ROMAN CATHOLIC AND NOW DESPISE THE ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH AS MUCH AS YOU GUYS DO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

What happened you may ask. Well what happened was that I experienced an identity crisis.

As an American, I always considered myself an American Anglo Saxon Nationalist since America was founded by English and therefore has English ethnic and cultural heritage(of course African American’s including Crispus Atticus, Frederick Douglas and Martin Luther King are also part of America’s glorious heritage).

Because of that I always idolized England because England is basically America’s father. I consider the Pre 1688 monarchs of Merry Old England to be my forefathers.

I therefore studied English history such as the Hundred Years War and knew that England was on the righteous side of the Hundred Years War because the English monarchs were fighting to claim the throne of France that was rightfully theirs because of Edward III being the nephew of Charles IV. See this article for more information. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_claims_to_the_French_throne

I recently discovered that Joan of Arc(the bitch that claimed that God gave her a vision that she must fight for France) was canonized by the Roman Catholic Church in 1920 as a saint! That means that the Roman Catholic Church believes that her alleged vision was genuine and that God was on the side of France in that war!

I AM THEREFORE PISSED OFF AT THE ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH FOR CANONIZING JOAN OF ARC!  Because of that, I converted to Traditionalist High Church Anglicanism/Anglo Catholicism which Saints Charles I and William Laud promoted. I now believe that the King James Bible is the only true English bible translation.

As a Neo Jacobite, I have always been upset that the descendants  of the royal martyr Charles I have been deprived of their rightful thrones of England, Scotland, Ireland, and France. The Jacobite pretenders were Roman Catholic but that was BEFORE Joan of Arc was canonized. Because of that I have come up with a plan to set things right.

What Moose and my other fellow Anglo Saxon brothers and sisters should do to avenge our forefathers (once the UK has successfully secured it’s borders) is to EMIGRATE to France to displace the native French population. Then you should coronate Franz Duke of Bavaria as the King of France(who shall also be made King of England, Scotland, and Northern Ireland). Force the French Catholics to convert to Anglicanism! Make May 30, the day when Joan the bitch was burnt at the stake by the English a mandatory national holiday for France to celebrate!

To destabilize the Catholic Church resistance against the English, the English should also invade the Vatican, depose Pope Francis and force the Cardinals to elect Franz of Bavaria as Pope which will finally reunify the Catholic Church and the Church of England. The Papacy will change from being an elective monarchy to becoming a hereditary  one ruled by the English monarchs. Priests will be allowed to marry and women will be allowed into the clergy. The Catholics of the world will have no choice but to obey the new Pope including the Irish who will be forced to surrender their Republic to the Kingdom of Northern Ireland to reunify Ireland under it’s legitimate King.

So you will be in luck Skide and Gimel. The English Dominated Catholic church will order the Polish Catholics to make some reforms. It will order the schools to teach evolution but in the form of Theistic Evolution.

The Church will allow Harry Potter to be read but it will revise the wording in the books in a way so that it emphasizes the difference between Godly magic and Satanic black magic/witchcraft like Lord of the Rings does. Hogwarts will be called Hogwarts School of Wizardry, eliminating the term witchcraft and the female wizards there will not be called witches. Voldemort and the Death Eaters will be the only ones referred to as Witches and Warlocks. Yahweh, Jesus Christ and the Virgin Mary will appear along with Dumbledore when Harry temporarily dies and goes to heaven.

 The church will command the priests to allow the celebration of All Saints Eve/Halloween but it will be a Christianized Halloween with crucifix’s as protection from demons. Therefore actual witchcraft such as Wicca, consultation of mediums and fortune tellers, and ouija boards will be forbidden in order to protect children from demons. Cross dressing and dressing lewdly will also be forbidden. It will be fun but holy.”

Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: ironbite on May 09, 2018, 07:57:53 pm
Cool story bro.
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: dpareja on May 09, 2018, 09:10:53 pm
da fuq
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: Jacob Harrison on May 09, 2018, 09:36:04 pm
It is a shocking plot twist, because I was such a die hard traditionalist Catholic and pissed many people off promoting traditionalist Catholicism.
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: Jacob Harrison on May 09, 2018, 09:37:34 pm
The users Skide and Gimel are Polish who used to live in Catholic Poland. They were very pissed off at my comments because of their experiences with the Catholics there.
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: Eiki-mun on May 09, 2018, 11:06:09 pm
So if I read this right, you completely changed your religion because the Catholic Church canonized Saint Jeanne d'Arc, and you're an England fanboy? Is that how it goes?

Uhh, have fun being Anglican, I guess. Shouldn't be hard to adjust, it's basically the same as Catholicism.
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: davedan on May 09, 2018, 11:14:44 pm
Hello, I am Jacob Harrison. On Fstdt.com, I promoted Roman Catholicism. I left the site when I had to take care of mental health problems but now I am better

Just in case keeping taking the meds mate.
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: Art Vandelay on May 09, 2018, 11:57:04 pm
Low quality bait.
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: Jacob Harrison on May 10, 2018, 07:42:25 am
So if I read this right, you completely changed your religion because the Catholic Church canonized Saint Jeanne d'Arc, and you're an England fanboy? Is that how it goes?

Uhh, have fun being Anglican, I guess. Shouldn't be hard to adjust, it's basically the same as Catholicism.

Yes. And then I later said how my fellow Anglo Saxon brothers and sisters can help avenge our forefathers. The Union Jack on your avatar indicates that your British, so you should help with the plan.
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: Jacob Harrison on May 10, 2018, 07:45:10 am
So if I read this right, you completely changed your religion because the Catholic Church canonized Saint Jeanne d'Arc, and you're an England fanboy? Is that how it goes?

Uhh, have fun being Anglican, I guess. Shouldn't be hard to adjust, it's basically the same as Catholicism.

Yes. And then I later said how my fellow Anglo Saxon brothers and sisters can help avenge our forefathers. The Union Jack on your avatar indicates that your British, so you should help with the plan.

Oh wait, I checked your profile and it says that your from Idaho. But as an American, you likely have English decent so you should help the plan to avenge our forefathers by spreading the word of my plan.
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: Jacob Harrison on May 10, 2018, 06:05:40 pm
So if I read this right, you completely changed your religion because the Catholic Church canonized Saint Jeanne d'Arc, and you're an England fanboy? Is that how it goes?

Uhh, have fun being Anglican, I guess. Shouldn't be hard to adjust, it's basically the same as Catholicism.

And also, I am a closet Anglican because my college is so close to home that I commute there instead of living on campus. Because of that, I am still living with my Catholic Parents, so I still have to attend Catholic Mass. But the Anglicans believe that Catholic Church has legitimate apostolic succession so my confessions to the priest are still forgiven by God.
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: Eiki-mun on May 10, 2018, 11:29:23 pm
So if I read this right, you completely changed your religion because the Catholic Church canonized Saint Jeanne d'Arc, and you're an England fanboy? Is that how it goes?

Uhh, have fun being Anglican, I guess. Shouldn't be hard to adjust, it's basically the same as Catholicism.

Yes. And then I later said how my fellow Anglo Saxon brothers and sisters can help avenge our forefathers. The Union Jack on your avatar indicates that your British, so you should help with the plan.

Oh wait, I checked your profile and it says that your from Idaho. But as an American, you likely have English decent so you should help the plan to avenge our forefathers by spreading the word of my plan.

Does it still say I'm from Idaho? Wow, I gotta update that.
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: Jacob Harrison on May 11, 2018, 05:18:56 pm
So if I read this right, you completely changed your religion because the Catholic Church canonized Saint Jeanne d'Arc, and you're an England fanboy? Is that how it goes?

Uhh, have fun being Anglican, I guess. Shouldn't be hard to adjust, it's basically the same as Catholicism.

Yes. And then I later said how my fellow Anglo Saxon brothers and sisters can help avenge our forefathers. The Union Jack on your avatar indicates that your British, so you should help with the plan.

Oh wait, I checked your profile and it says that your from Idaho. But as an American, you likely have English decent so you should help the plan to avenge our forefathers by spreading the word of my plan.

Does it still say I'm from Idaho? Wow, I gotta update that.

Regardless of your state, your American meaning that you likely have English ancestry
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: Svata on May 12, 2018, 02:48:31 pm
Are you just... not acknowledging the existence of nonwhite Americans? (Also, English isn't really more likely than any other western European nation, iirc.)
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: Eiki-mun on May 12, 2018, 04:19:27 pm
Majority German, actually. Thanks for playing.
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: Jacob Harrison on May 12, 2018, 04:24:41 pm
Are you just... not acknowledging the existence of nonwhite Americans? (Also, English isn't really more likely than any other western European nation, iirc.)

I did NOT say that I don’t acknowledge the existence of non white Americans. I said that both Anglo Saxons  AND African Americans are part of America’s glorious heritage. I also consider Latinos they have been living here LEGALLY as a result of the Louisiana purchase and Mexican American War as part of America’s glorious heritage. Japanese and Korean Americans are also part of America’s glorious heritage. Jews are also part of America’s glorious heritage. So are native Americans.

I was saying that many Americans have English as well as other ethnic heritages. But, our CULTURE is English.. Our Constitution is based on Common Law. The language we speak is English.
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: ironbite on May 12, 2018, 05:57:12 pm
......can the main site get fixed please?
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: Tolpuddle Martyr on May 12, 2018, 07:26:19 pm
So if I read this right, you completely changed your religion because the Catholic Church canonized Saint Jeanne d'Arc, and you're an England fanboy? Is that how it goes?

Uhh, have fun being Anglican, I guess. Shouldn't be hard to adjust, it's basically the same as Catholicism.
Bells, frocks and smells innit.

Hey Jake, here's some attention. There, do you feel validated?
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: Jacob Harrison on May 12, 2018, 08:08:28 pm
So if I read this right, you completely changed your religion because the Catholic Church canonized Saint Jeanne d'Arc, and you're an England fanboy? Is that how it goes?

Uhh, have fun being Anglican, I guess. Shouldn't be hard to adjust, it's basically the same as Catholicism.
Bells, frocks and smells innit.

Hey Jake, here's some attention. There, do you feel validated?

I don’t understand what you mean. I already know that Anglican services are mostly the same as Catholic ones.
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: Tolpuddle Martyr on May 12, 2018, 08:30:58 pm
Are you old enough to remember the life before the "sexual revolution?"

Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: Jacob Harrison on May 12, 2018, 09:10:09 pm
Are you old enough to remember the life before the "sexual revolution?"

No but my grandparents told me that it was a far better time period. Sex and Romance was much more intimate because people married younger and stayed commited to one partner and there was far less adultry. Sex and marriage was used for it’s biological purpose which is procreation. There was far less divorce rates so families stayed together which was best for the children. There were far less teen pregnancies and AIDS. The mass murder of unborn babies was both less common and illegal. Woman were treated far better by men because they were treated as people rather than sex objects. Boys were therefore taught shame for masterbating because masterbation was seen as depraved and disrespectful to women. There were heroic Christian women like Rosa Parks who spent their time standing up for equal rights as well as the 3 heroic Christian women mathematicians who did the calculations that helped put Alan Shepard in space and man on the moon. 

Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: Tolpuddle Martyr on May 12, 2018, 09:34:51 pm
Your grandparents went into detail about their sex lives?
No wonder you're messed up!

Art, cut this mans bollocks off and put him out of his misery!
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: Jacob Harrison on May 13, 2018, 11:10:49 am
Your grandparents went into detail about their sex lives?
No wonder you're messed up!

Art, cut this mans bollocks off and put him out of his misery!

He agreed to do that, but I need to pay him $13,600 for him to travel from Australia to America. So as I said before, I need $13,600. Do you have that money? If you give me that plus extra, I can invest the extra cash into a bank account so that I can pay you back in interest.
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: davedan on May 13, 2018, 05:51:44 pm
Your grandparents went into detail about their sex lives?
No wonder you're messed up!

Art, cut this mans bollocks off and put him out of his misery!

He agreed to do that, but I need to pay him $13,600 for him to travel from Australia to America. So as I said before, I need $13,600. Do you have that money? If you give me that plus extra, I can invest the extra cash into a bank account so that I can pay you back in interest.

You know what I think investing with Origen wannabe self castrating Crypto-Anglicans has got to be the best investment decision of a life time. Fuck where do I sign up.
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: Jacob Harrison on May 13, 2018, 06:11:15 pm
Your grandparents went into detail about their sex lives?
No wonder you're messed up!

Art, cut this mans bollocks off and put him out of his misery!

He agreed to do that, but I need to pay him $13,600 for him to travel from Australia to America. So as I said before, I need $13,600. Do you have that money? If you give me that plus extra, I can invest the extra cash into a bank account so that I can pay you back in interest.

You know what I think investing with Origen wannabe self castrating Crypto-Anglicans has got to be the best investment decision of a life time. Fuck where do I sign up.

Well first I will have to create a new secret bank account because I am only 19 and in college so my parents still have access to my bank account. Then you can invest. Not sure if I should use pay pal or go fund me. Which will get me enough money sooner?
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: davedan on May 13, 2018, 06:26:00 pm
Your grandparents went into detail about their sex lives?
No wonder you're messed up!

Art, cut this mans bollocks off and put him out of his misery!

He agreed to do that, but I need to pay him $13,600 for him to travel from Australia to America. So as I said before, I need $13,600. Do you have that money? If you give me that plus extra, I can invest the extra cash into a bank account so that I can pay you back in interest.

You know what I think investing with Origen wannabe self castrating Crypto-Anglicans has got to be the best investment decision of a life time. Fuck where do I sign up.

Well first I will have to create a new secret bank account because I am only 19 and in college so my parents still have access to my bank account. Then you can invest. Not sure if I should use pay pal or go fund me. Which will get me enough money sooner?

Well I think you should probably get in contact with my friend Prince Ndou of Nigeria. He is the Deputy Chief Minister for roads and infrastructure, the construction of a bridge has been cancelled but he still has the funding and is looking for a way to get the money out of Nigeria.
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: Jacob Harrison on May 13, 2018, 08:08:14 pm
Your grandparents went into detail about their sex lives?
No wonder you're messed up!

Art, cut this mans bollocks off and put him out of his misery!

He agreed to do that, but I need to pay him $13,600 for him to travel from Australia to America. So as I said before, I need $13,600. Do you have that money? If you give me that plus extra, I can invest the extra cash into a bank account so that I can pay you back in interest.

You know what I think investing with Origen wannabe self castrating Crypto-Anglicans has got to be the best investment decision of a life time. Fuck where do I sign up.

Well first I will have to create a new secret bank account because I am only 19 and in college so my parents still have access to my bank account. Then you can invest. Not sure if I should use pay pal or go fund me. Which will get me enough money sooner?

Well I think you should probably get in contact with my friend Prince Ndou of Nigeria. He is the Deputy Chief Minister for roads and infrastructure, the construction of a bridge has been cancelled but he still has the funding and is looking for a way to get the money out of Nigeria.

Do you have his email? And another question that I have is, when creating an Online Bank account for Bank of America, it is asking me to give my home address. How can I prevent them from sending mail to my parent’s house. I normally get the mail but there is a risk of my mom getting the mail if let’s say, I am at a friends house, or if I’m sick. She could find it and discover that I set up my own bank account.
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: niam2023 on May 13, 2018, 08:41:19 pm
On your Harry Potter yammering among other things: no. Nobody has to edit their books for your Church or any church any more. This isn't the middle ages - this is 2018. We don't have to edit books for your religion, nor do we have to change evolutionary theory for it.

Nobody cares who was canonized or when. Get over it.

Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: Jacob Harrison on May 13, 2018, 09:15:23 pm
On your Harry Potter yammering among other things: no. Nobody has to edit their books for your Church or any church any more. This isn't the middle ages - this is 2018. We don't have to edit books for your religion, nor do we have to change evolutionary theory for it.

Nobody cares who was canonized or when. Get over it.

1. But isn’t it concerning that children who read Harry Potter won’t learn the difference between good magic and witchcraft since witchcraft is traditionally considered evil? It could cause teens to try to play with the occult such as buying Ouija boards and use them to summon spirits which could lead to demonic attacks. Demonic attacks from ouija boards have been documented by numerous testimonies throughout history as well as YouTube videos.

2. It is not changing evolutionary theory as evolution is irrelevant to both atheism and religion. Only religious evolution deniers and certain atheists create the false dichotomy of atheism vs evolution denial. It is part of the bigger false dichotomy of religion vs science. You can be both religious and scientific as many scientists throughout history were religious.

3. You should care, because America has Anglo Saxon cultural heritage and therefore the pre 1688 English monarchs are our forefathers. You should therefore be outraged that the Jacobite successors have been deprived of their rightful thrones of England, Scotland, Ireland, and France.
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: Sigmaleph on May 13, 2018, 09:20:16 pm
On your Harry Potter yammering among other things: no. Nobody has to edit their books for your Church or any church any more. This isn't the middle ages - this is 2018. We don't have to edit books for your religion, nor do we have to change evolutionary theory for it.

Nobody cares who was canonized or when. Get over it.

1. But isn’t it concerning that children who read Harry Potter won’t learn the difference between good magic and witchcraft since witchcraft is traditionally considered evil? It could cause teens to try to buy Ouija boards and use them to summon spirits which could lead to demonic attacks. Demonic attacks from ouija boards have been documented by numerous testimonies throughout history as well as YouTube videos.

2. It is not changing evolutionary theory as evolution is irrelevant to both atheism and religion. Only religious evolution deniers and certain atheists create the false dichotomy of atheism vs evolution denial. It is part of the bigger false dichotomy of religion vs science. You can be both religious and scientific as many scientists throughout history were religious.

3. You should care, because America has Anglo Saxon cultural heritage and therefore the pre 1688 English monarchs are our forefathers. You should therefore be outraged that the Jacobite successors have been deprived of their rightful thrones of England, Scotland, Ireland, and France.

So uh, correct me if I'm wrong, history isn't my strong suit, but wasn't America founded by a rebellion against the British monarchy
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: Jacob Harrison on May 13, 2018, 09:28:26 pm
On your Harry Potter yammering among other things: no. Nobody has to edit their books for your Church or any church any more. This isn't the middle ages - this is 2018. We don't have to edit books for your religion, nor do we have to change evolutionary theory for it.

Nobody cares who was canonized or when. Get over it.

1. But isn’t it concerning that children who read Harry Potter won’t learn the difference between good magic and witchcraft since witchcraft is traditionally considered evil? It could cause teens to try to buy Ouija boards and use them to summon spirits which could lead to demonic attacks. Demonic attacks from ouija boards have been documented by numerous testimonies throughout history as well as YouTube videos.

2. It is not changing evolutionary theory as evolution is irrelevant to both atheism and religion. Only religious evolution deniers and certain atheists create the false dichotomy of atheism vs evolution denial. It is part of the bigger false dichotomy of religion vs science. You can be both religious and scientific as many scientists throughout history were religious.

3. You should care, because America has Anglo Saxon cultural heritage and therefore the pre 1688 English monarchs are our forefathers. You should therefore be outraged that the Jacobite successors have been deprived of their rightful thrones of England, Scotland, Ireland, and France.

So uh, correct me if I'm wrong, history isn't my strong suit, but wasn't America founded by a rebellion against the British monarchy

It was a rebellion against the tyrannical post 1688 illegitimate monarchy, and the corrupt Parliament that illegally siezed power in the “Glorious Revolution” of 1688. The pre-1688 great Stuart monarchs treated the colonies far better. The United States did not invite the Jacobite claimant Charles Edward Stuart to be crowned King of America but that doesn’t matter because Charles Edward Stuart never claimed the American throne.
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: Art Vandelay on May 13, 2018, 09:35:24 pm
1. But isn’t it concerning that children who read Harry Potter won’t learn the difference between good magic and witchcraft since witchcraft is traditionally considered evil? It could cause teens to try to play with the occult such as buying Ouija boards and use them to summon spirits which could lead to demonic attacks. Demonic attacks from ouija boards have been documented by numerous testimonies throughout history as well as YouTube videos.
No. No, it isn't. This is of course completely unrelated to the fact that it's all make believe. Harry Potter, oija boards, demons, Christianity and magic of all varieties. What's more concerning is the sheer number of grown ass adults who take magic seriously.
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: dpareja on May 13, 2018, 09:37:29 pm
The Stuarts tended toward personal rule; afterward, monarchs tended to defer to Parliament. If any monarchs were being tyrannical, it's the former.

Parliament, being a body representative of the governed, had every right to determine who and under what conditions the de jure chief executive would be. Would you have preferred a nice long bloody war?

The American Revolution had nothing to do with who the monarch was. It was a matter of principle, that nobody should be taxed without a voice in the decision to levy that tax (but tell that to DC...), and later American envoys to the United Kingdom stated that had the colonies been given fair representation in the Commons and the Lords, they would not have rebelled. It was the British assertion of their supposed right to legislate for their colonies without those same colonies having any voice in the decision that sparked the rebellion.

I am a fan of monarchy, and I prefer it to (almost) any form of republic, but I favour parliamentary constitutional monarchy, in which Parliament exercises the legislative power and determines through the confidence mechanism who shall exercise, de facto, the executive power, and the monarch, while still the de jure chief executive, actually wields only the reserve powers and then only at direst need.
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: niam2023 on May 13, 2018, 10:21:21 pm
I do not give half a crap about your traditions or who is king or queen or whatever is going on about the church.

I am sure I can find YouTube videos discussing proof of lizard people. Do I believe them? Ssscertainly not!

I do not care about what some backwards morons did or what heritage people have. It is not important to who anyone really is what guy ruled in 1638 or whatever.

Some geezer can rant about it, but the fact is we young people these days want to fuck, lift, look great, and hang out with other handsome and beautiful people. So take your talk of Gackobites and shove it so far up your ass you digest it again.
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: Jacob Harrison on May 13, 2018, 10:24:56 pm
The Stuarts tended toward personal rule; afterward, monarchs tended to defer to Parliament. If any monarchs were being tyrannical, it's the former.

Parliament, being a body representative of the governed, had every right to determine who and under what conditions the de jure chief executive would be. Would you have preferred a nice long bloody war?

The American Revolution had nothing to do with who the monarch was. It was a matter of principle, that nobody should be taxed without a voice in the decision to levy that tax (but tell that to DC...), and later American envoys to the United Kingdom stated that had the colonies been given fair representation in the Commons and the Lords, they would not have rebelled. It was the British assertion of their supposed right to legislate for their colonies without those same colonies having any voice in the decision that sparked the rebellion.

I am a fan of monarchy, and I prefer it to (almost) any form of republic, but I favour parliamentary constitutional monarchy, in which Parliament exercises the legislative power and determines through the confidence mechanism who shall exercise, de facto, the executive power, and the monarch, while still the de jure chief executive, actually wields only the reserve powers and then only at direst need.

The Stuart’s were not tyrannical. They had near absolute power, but they did what was in the best interests of their country. Cromwell was the real tyrant. He established a fanatical puritanical regime outlawing so many things and commiting horrific atrocities against the Irish. The English resented his regime so much that they cheered the return of Charles II.

And Parliament had no right to overthrow King James II because at that time, the King’s Power legally was over Parliament and King James II didn’t do anything bad. Parliament was against him because he was a Roman Catholic(before Joan of Arc was canonized) and allowed tolerance of Protestant sects that were not Anglican. What was tyrannical about that?

I am aware what the American Revolution was about and the justified reasons the colonists rebelled. I am saying that the Stuart’s mostly left the colonies alone and focused more on mainland England so the tyranical oppression would never have happened had Charles Edward Stuart been King.
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: Jacob Harrison on May 13, 2018, 10:40:44 pm
I do not give half a crap about your traditions or who is king or queen or whatever is going on about the church.

I am sure I can find YouTube videos discussing proof of lizard people. Do I believe them? Ssscertainly not!

I do not care about what some backwards morons did or what heritage people have. It is not important to who anyone really is what guy ruled in 1638 or whatever.

Some geezer can rant about it, but the fact is we young people these days want to fuck, lift, look great, and hang out with other handsome and beautiful people. So take your talk of Gackobites and shove it so far up your ass you digest it again.

The YouTube videos I am talking about don’t discuss proofs of demonic attacks, they actually show footage of them. And there is also a documentary on the phenomena of sleep paralysis where people talk of their experiences of being attacked by demons. And don’t you realize that fucking with multiple people instead of with one partner makes fucking less romantic and special.

And the heritage is YOUR heritage because your an American. You should be patriotic and honor our countries heritage. And I am not an old geezer, I’m 19.
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: niam2023 on May 13, 2018, 11:01:00 pm
And again I can show you videos demonstrating what seems like proof to the video maker of lizard people. Does this make them remotely true? No.

And again - I do not care what wankers showed up, or what the jacrobites are. You don't own patriotism and you certainly can't own how people live their lives.

The most I can tell you now is just go try and find people to fuck - women, men and in any combination thereof to date your loins. You don't need some Anglo heritage bullshit. Whatever your folks or whatever told you, its stupid and wrong.
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: Jacob Harrison on May 13, 2018, 11:34:23 pm
And again I can show you videos demonstrating what seems like proof to the video maker of lizard people. Does this make them remotely true? No.

And again - I do not care what wankers showed up, or what the jacrobites are. You don't own patriotism and you certainly can't own how people live their lives.

The most I can tell you now is just go try and find people to fuck - women, men and in any combination thereof to date your loins. You don't need some Anglo heritage bullshit. Whatever your folks or whatever told you, its stupid and wrong.

1. I know that many videos are bullshit and have CGI. I am talking about eyewitness testimonies, and footage of people getting attacked. In some of them, they are even on security cameras.

2. I don’t own patriotism but our nation in which we are citizens of does.

3. How is what my family taught me stupid? I don’t see how you could argue that fucking around with whoever is better than a committed loving romantic relationship. And fucking around with multiple partners also gives you AIDS.

Besides, I said that I am not sexual enough to fuck because I get sexually turned on not by the thought of a women’s vagina butcby the thought of me masterbating to a female hence my nightmares. Do you know how I can cure my fetish?
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: niam2023 on May 14, 2018, 03:03:45 am
1) And a lot of those videos you talk about are people being tortured by their folks - who are convinced those people have demons in them. People've been murdered for "seeming demon possessed" by their own folks.

2) And being that heritage is only ever brought up by alt-right shitweasels and others of their sort, I see no reason to take any sort of pride in heritage. My dad said it best "people who are proud of their heritage have nothing else to be proud of."

3) Because as we're seeing now, people have decided they don't WANT to be committed to one person. And fucking around only gives you AIDS if you're not careful.

Uh, just try unwinding and having some sex, man. You won't know till you go out and try.
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: Tolpuddle Martyr on May 14, 2018, 07:28:35 am
The Stuart’s were not tyrannical. They had near absolute power, but they did what was in the best interests of their country. Cromwell was the real tyrant. He established a fanatical puritanical regime outlawing so many things and commiting horrific atrocities against the Irish. The English resented his regime so much that they cheered the return of Charles II.

And Parliament had no right to overthrow King James II because at that time, the King’s Power legally was over Parliament and King James II didn’t do anything bad. Parliament was against him because he was a Roman Catholic(before Joan of Arc was canonized) and allowed tolerance of Protestant sects that were not Anglican. What was tyrannical about that?
Yes, Cromwell was a dick but coming from an anti sexual revolution, anti feminist guy whose only acceptable variant of sexual activity is fapping furiously before reluctantly sticking his end into a certified virgin's vagina is signalling his opposition to...fanatical puritanism?

Come again?

Yes, yes the pun was intentional, and terrible, for that alone I'm truly sorry!
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: Jacob Harrison on May 14, 2018, 09:31:26 am
1) And a lot of those videos you talk about are people being tortured by their folks - who are convinced those people have demons in them. People've been murdered for "seeming demon possessed" by their own folks.

2) And being that heritage is only ever brought up by alt-right shitweasels and others of their sort, I see no reason to take any sort of pride in heritage. My dad said it best "people who are proud of their heritage have nothing else to be proud of."

3) Because as we're seeing now, people have decided they don't WANT to be committed to one person. And fucking around only gives you AIDS if you're not careful.

Uh, just try unwinding and having some sex, man. You won't know till you go out and try.

1. Actually in a lot of cases, their folks don’t believe their testimonies. And in most cases of demon possession, the families get a priest to perform an exorcism. Exorcisms have also been documented.

2. So you are not proud of our forefathers who made this nation great? You are not proud of our founding fathers for founding this nation? You are not proud of the first REPUBLICAN President Abraham Lincoln for keeping our nation together and crushing the treasonous DEMOCRAT slaver confederate rebellion? You are not proud of our soldiers who fought for our country in the World Wars defending our nation? You are not proud of Martin Luther King Jr, for defeating the racist DEMOCRAT power in the South and getting the Civil Rights Act passed?

3. That is a problem today. People who have promiscuous sex eventually get depressed because they are not in loving relationships. They begin to feel worthless. And few people want to date them because they don’t trust that they won’t cheat on them. Those are reasons why I don’t want to have promiscuous sex.
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: Jacob Harrison on May 14, 2018, 09:44:53 am
The Stuart’s were not tyrannical. They had near absolute power, but they did what was in the best interests of their country. Cromwell was the real tyrant. He established a fanatical puritanical regime outlawing so many things and commiting horrific atrocities against the Irish. The English resented his regime so much that they cheered the return of Charles II.

And Parliament had no right to overthrow King James II because at that time, the King’s Power legally was over Parliament and King James II didn’t do anything bad. Parliament was against him because he was a Roman Catholic(before Joan of Arc was canonized) and allowed tolerance of Protestant sects that were not Anglican. What was tyrannical about that?
Yes, Cromwell was a dick but coming from an anti sexual revolution, anti feminist guy whose only acceptable variant of sexual activity is fapping furiously before reluctantly sticking his end into a certified virgin's vagina is signalling his opposition to...fanatical puritanism?

Come again?

Yes, yes the pun was intentional, and terrible, for that alone I'm truly sorry!

I am not as extreme as the fanatical Puritan heretics. My views on sex reflect those of conservative Anglicans. And I am not anti feminist, because I believe that women should have equal rights and not have to deal with perverts like you guys objectifying them and putting them in uncomfortable situations. And the Civil Rights Act already makes discriminating against women in the workplace and not giving them equal pay illegal. And I wish I could be more naturally attracted to a women’s vagina but I can’t help that I have such a fetish to the thought of masterbation. No matter how much I look at images of vagina’s on the internet, I am not turned on by them.

I am a victim of the sexual revolution which has caused a rise in degenerate paraphilias. My fapping fetish however is not as bad as other creepy perverted fetishes that people have. My fetish involves thinking of MYSELF fapping while other people’s fetishes involve bizzare and disgusting fantasies about a woman.
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: Tolpuddle Martyr on May 14, 2018, 05:11:31 pm
Yup, back in the day when young virgins were traded as chattel for real estate it was much more feministy.

Uh huh.

And you really don't need to go into any more detail about your fapping, really. We're good. Thanks.
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: davedan on May 14, 2018, 06:05:13 pm
The Stuart’s were not tyrannical. They had near absolute power, but they did what was in the best interests of their country. Cromwell was the real tyrant. He established a fanatical puritanical regime outlawing so many things and commiting horrific atrocities against the Irish. The English resented his regime so much that they cheered the return of Charles II.

And Parliament had no right to overthrow King James II because at that time, the King’s Power legally was over Parliament and King James II didn’t do anything bad. Parliament was against him because he was a Roman Catholic(before Joan of Arc was canonized) and allowed tolerance of Protestant sects that were not Anglican. What was tyrannical about that?
Yes, Cromwell was a dick but coming from an anti sexual revolution, anti feminist guy whose only acceptable variant of sexual activity is fapping furiously before reluctantly sticking his end into a certified virgin's vagina is signalling his opposition to...fanatical puritanism?

Come again?

Yes, yes the pun was intentional, and terrible, for that alone I'm truly sorry!

I am not as extreme as the fanatical Puritan heretics. My views on sex reflect those of conservative Anglicans. And I am not anti feminist, because I believe that women should have equal rights and not have to deal with perverts like you guys objectifying them and putting them in uncomfortable situations. And the Civil Rights Act already makes discriminating against women in the workplace and not giving them equal pay illegal. And I wish I could be more naturally attracted to a women’s vagina but I can’t help that I have such a fetish to the thought of masterbation. No matter how much I look at images of vagina’s on the internet, I am not turned on by them.

I am a victim of the sexual revolution which has caused a rise in degenerate paraphilias. My fapping fetish however is not as bad as other creepy perverted fetishes that people have. My fetish involves thinking of MYSELF fapping while other people’s fetishes involve bizzare and disgusting fantasies about a woman.

So you are not attracted to vaginas but to the idea of a thick hard cock being slowly stroked. What about one being stroked next to yours? ...gets you going right?
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: dpareja on May 14, 2018, 06:49:14 pm
And Parliament had no right to overthrow King James II because at that time, the King’s Power legally was over Parliament and King James II didn’t do anything bad. Parliament was against him because he was a Roman Catholic(before Joan of Arc was canonized) and allowed tolerance of Protestant sects that were not Anglican. What was tyrannical about that?

Except that when a single individual (or group thereof--don't think I think all that highly of the House of Lords), unaccountable to the governed, has power over those who are so accountable, that creates a fundamentally unfair and untenable situation that would almost certainly have eventually exploded into civil war had it not been for the Glorious Revolution. Parliament had every moral right to assert its proper authority, as the representatives of the people, over the unelected monarch.

I ask again: would you have preferred a bloody war?
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: niam2023 on May 14, 2018, 07:48:09 pm
There is no such thing as demon possession - get that into your thick skull. There's mental illness and psycho religious nuts insisting someone's mental illness is all demons.

Those people are all great, sure - but I don't take pride in just their existence. As I said before, people who are entirely proud of their heritage have nothing else to be proud of. And if you're so fucking stupid you don't get the causes and politics of the parties flipped over the years, you fail history even harder man. So, to give you a final answer, no, I am not proud of my heritage. Heritage is nothing but dumbasses wanking over how great their great great great granduncle Cletus was for doing some dumbass thing in the 1800s or some shit like that.

And so says you and your kid-fucking priests on number 3. Of course the religious nuts do not want people out having fun, so they make shit up like that. "Hurr, you need to be in a loving relationship long term to be happy. CUZ JAYSUS!"
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: Jacob Harrison on May 14, 2018, 07:50:41 pm
Yup, back in the day when young virgins were traded as chattel for real estate it was much more feministy.

Uh huh.

And you really don't need to go into any more detail about your fapping, really. We're good. Thanks.

Sex trafficking happens a lot more after the sexual revolution that before it. Teaching men to repress their sexual thoughts is more respectful to women because it is morally wrong to fap to a woman if she doesn’t want you to do so.
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: Jacob Harrison on May 14, 2018, 08:02:27 pm
And Parliament had no right to overthrow King James II because at that time, the King’s Power legally was over Parliament and King James II didn’t do anything bad. Parliament was against him because he was a Roman Catholic(before Joan of Arc was canonized) and allowed tolerance of Protestant sects that were not Anglican. What was tyrannical about that?

Except that when a single individual (or group thereof--don't think I think all that highly of the House of Lords), unaccountable to the governed, has power over those who are so accountable, that creates a fundamentally unfair and untenable situation that would almost certainly have eventually exploded into civil war had it not been for the Glorious Revolution. Parliament had every moral right to assert its proper authority, as the representatives of the people, over the unelected monarch.

I ask again: would you have preferred a bloody war?

I would not prefer a bloody war. I would prefer King James II bringing order and stability to England by enforcing the law which he was doing. Of course a monarch should obey a countries laws and not act arbitrarily, but the Magna Carta already restrained the monarch from doing that.

Besides, how was King James II abusing his power by protecting the rights of religious minorities in his Kingdoms. That is something you should answer.
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: Jacob Harrison on May 14, 2018, 08:25:47 pm
The Stuart’s were not tyrannical. They had near absolute power, but they did what was in the best interests of their country. Cromwell was the real tyrant. He established a fanatical puritanical regime outlawing so many things and commiting horrific atrocities against the Irish. The English resented his regime so much that they cheered the return of Charles II.

And Parliament had no right to overthrow King James II because at that time, the King’s Power legally was over Parliament and King James II didn’t do anything bad. Parliament was against him because he was a Roman Catholic(before Joan of Arc was canonized) and allowed tolerance of Protestant sects that were not Anglican. What was tyrannical about that?
Yes, Cromwell was a dick but coming from an anti sexual revolution, anti feminist guy whose only acceptable variant of sexual activity is fapping furiously before reluctantly sticking his end into a certified virgin's vagina is signalling his opposition to...fanatical puritanism?

Come again?

Yes, yes the pun was intentional, and terrible, for that alone I'm truly sorry!

I am not as extreme as the fanatical Puritan heretics. My views on sex reflect those of conservative Anglicans. And I am not anti feminist, because I believe that women should have equal rights and not have to deal with perverts like you guys objectifying them and putting them in uncomfortable situations. And the Civil Rights Act already makes discriminating against women in the workplace and not giving them equal pay illegal. And I wish I could be more naturally attracted to a women’s vagina but I can’t help that I have such a fetish to the thought of masterbation. No matter how much I look at images of vagina’s on the internet, I am not turned on by them.

I am a victim of the sexual revolution which has caused a rise in degenerate paraphilias. My fapping fetish however is not as bad as other creepy perverted fetishes that people have. My fetish involves thinking of MYSELF fapping while other people’s fetishes involve bizzare and disgusting fantasies about a woman.

So you are not attracted to vaginas but to the idea of a thick hard cock being slowly stroked. What about one being stroked next to yours? ...gets you going right?

No that does not get me going. What gets me going is my own cock being stroked when thinking about an attractive girl. The problem is that I am turned on by a girl in clothes wearing jeans, not naked girls. In fact I am not only not turned on by a girl’s vagina, I am grossed out by a women’s vagina because it is wet and slimy and it would feel gross sticking my cock into it.
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: Tolpuddle Martyr on May 14, 2018, 08:48:11 pm
So find yourself a virgin gal into eccentric ex Catholics that hate their ladybits while you fap off to the Levis catalogue. Simples.
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: Jacob Harrison on May 14, 2018, 09:41:40 pm
There is no such thing as demon possession - get that into your thick skull. There's mental illness and psycho religious nuts insisting someone's mental illness is all demons.

Those people are all great, sure - but I don't take pride in just their existence. As I said before, people who are entirely proud of their heritage have nothing else to be proud of. And if you're so fucking stupid you don't get the causes and politics of the parties flipped over the years, you fail history even harder man. So, to give you a final answer, no, I am not proud of my heritage. Heritage is nothing but dumbasses wanking over how great their great great great granduncle Cletus was for doing some dumbass thing in the 1800s or some shit like that.

And so says you and your kid-fucking priests on number 3. Of course the religious nuts do not want people out having fun, so they make shit up like that. "Hurr, you need to be in a loving relationship long term to be happy. CUZ JAYSUS!"

1. But many people who are normally mentally sane experience attacks by demons. In fact, investigators ask them about their history of mental illness, or if they have been taking drugs. And you just admitted that Christianity is cooler than Atheism because it believes in the existence of spirits interacting among us from heaven and hell, as well as evil fallen angels. The Exorcist was a Christian based movie.

2. I am not entirely proud of my heritage. I am also proud of my own accomplishments such as graduating high school making it into the honor role, working hard at my summer jobs, and getting good grades in college. And it is not a history fail. The parties did not switch sides in the 1960s. Most Southern Democrats like Margaret Sanger(who influenced Hillary Clinton) remained Southern Democrats until their death.

3. The pedophilia priest scandal is the biggest in the Roman Catholic Church and non Anglican Protestant churches. It doesn’t happen in the Anglican and Eastern Orthodox Churches. Most people want to have genuine romantic love.

Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: dpareja on May 14, 2018, 09:43:56 pm
And Parliament had no right to overthrow King James II because at that time, the King’s Power legally was over Parliament and King James II didn’t do anything bad. Parliament was against him because he was a Roman Catholic(before Joan of Arc was canonized) and allowed tolerance of Protestant sects that were not Anglican. What was tyrannical about that?

Except that when a single individual (or group thereof--don't think I think all that highly of the House of Lords), unaccountable to the governed, has power over those who are so accountable, that creates a fundamentally unfair and untenable situation that would almost certainly have eventually exploded into civil war had it not been for the Glorious Revolution. Parliament had every moral right to assert its proper authority, as the representatives of the people, over the unelected monarch.

I ask again: would you have preferred a bloody war?

I would not prefer a bloody war. I would prefer King James II bringing order and stability to England by enforcing the law which he was doing. Of course a monarch should obey a countries laws and not act arbitrarily, but the Magna Carta already restrained the monarch from doing that.

Besides, how was King James II abusing his power by protecting the rights of religious minorities in his Kingdoms. That is something you should answer.

Because using his power in a manner opposed to the wishes of the governed is abusing his power, whatever the effects.
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: Jacob Harrison on May 14, 2018, 09:49:26 pm
And Parliament had no right to overthrow King James II because at that time, the King’s Power legally was over Parliament and King James II didn’t do anything bad. Parliament was against him because he was a Roman Catholic(before Joan of Arc was canonized) and allowed tolerance of Protestant sects that were not Anglican. What was tyrannical about that?

Except that when a single individual (or group thereof--don't think I think all that highly of the House of Lords), unaccountable to the governed, has power over those who are so accountable, that creates a fundamentally unfair and untenable situation that would almost certainly have eventually exploded into civil war had it not been for the Glorious Revolution. Parliament had every moral right to assert its proper authority, as the representatives of the people, over the unelected monarch.

I ask again: would you have preferred a bloody war?

I would not prefer a bloody war. I would prefer King James II bringing order and stability to England by enforcing the law which he was doing. Of course a monarch should obey a countries laws and not act arbitrarily, but the Magna Carta already restrained the monarch from doing that.

Besides, how was King James II abusing his power by protecting the rights of religious minorities in his Kingdoms. That is something you should answer.

Because using his power in a manner opposed to the wishes of the governed is abusing his power, whatever the effects.

So your a fan of tyranny of the majority rather than a monarch who protected the rights of minorities.
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: dpareja on May 14, 2018, 10:04:58 pm
And Parliament had no right to overthrow King James II because at that time, the King’s Power legally was over Parliament and King James II didn’t do anything bad. Parliament was against him because he was a Roman Catholic(before Joan of Arc was canonized) and allowed tolerance of Protestant sects that were not Anglican. What was tyrannical about that?

Except that when a single individual (or group thereof--don't think I think all that highly of the House of Lords), unaccountable to the governed, has power over those who are so accountable, that creates a fundamentally unfair and untenable situation that would almost certainly have eventually exploded into civil war had it not been for the Glorious Revolution. Parliament had every moral right to assert its proper authority, as the representatives of the people, over the unelected monarch.

I ask again: would you have preferred a bloody war?

I would not prefer a bloody war. I would prefer King James II bringing order and stability to England by enforcing the law which he was doing. Of course a monarch should obey a countries laws and not act arbitrarily, but the Magna Carta already restrained the monarch from doing that.

Besides, how was King James II abusing his power by protecting the rights of religious minorities in his Kingdoms. That is something you should answer.

Because using his power in a manner opposed to the wishes of the governed is abusing his power, whatever the effects.

So your a fan of tyranny of the majority rather than a monarch who protected the rights of minorities.

I'm not a fan of the UK's system insofar as it has no entrenched protections for rights. But I cannot condone the monarch's unilateral use of power just because I like the effect it happened to have in this instance.
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: Jacob Harrison on May 14, 2018, 10:17:09 pm
And Parliament had no right to overthrow King James II because at that time, the King’s Power legally was over Parliament and King James II didn’t do anything bad. Parliament was against him because he was a Roman Catholic(before Joan of Arc was canonized) and allowed tolerance of Protestant sects that were not Anglican. What was tyrannical about that?

Except that when a single individual (or group thereof--don't think I think all that highly of the House of Lords), unaccountable to the governed, has power over those who are so accountable, that creates a fundamentally unfair and untenable situation that would almost certainly have eventually exploded into civil war had it not been for the Glorious Revolution. Parliament had every moral right to assert its proper authority, as the representatives of the people, over the unelected monarch.

I ask again: would you have preferred a bloody war?

I would not prefer a bloody war. I would prefer King James II bringing order and stability to England by enforcing the law which he was doing. Of course a monarch should obey a countries laws and not act arbitrarily, but the Magna Carta already restrained the monarch from doing that.

Besides, how was King James II abusing his power by protecting the rights of religious minorities in his Kingdoms. That is something you should answer.

Because using his power in a manner opposed to the wishes of the governed is abusing his power, whatever the effects.

So your a fan of tyranny of the majority rather than a monarch who protected the rights of minorities.

I'm not a fan of the UK's system insofar as it has no entrenched protections for rights. But I cannot condone the monarch's unilateral use of power just because I like the effect it happened to have in this instance.

So you believe that minorities should deal with having their rights sacrificed for the ideal of democracy?
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: dpareja on May 14, 2018, 10:45:16 pm
And Parliament had no right to overthrow King James II because at that time, the King’s Power legally was over Parliament and King James II didn’t do anything bad. Parliament was against him because he was a Roman Catholic(before Joan of Arc was canonized) and allowed tolerance of Protestant sects that were not Anglican. What was tyrannical about that?

Except that when a single individual (or group thereof--don't think I think all that highly of the House of Lords), unaccountable to the governed, has power over those who are so accountable, that creates a fundamentally unfair and untenable situation that would almost certainly have eventually exploded into civil war had it not been for the Glorious Revolution. Parliament had every moral right to assert its proper authority, as the representatives of the people, over the unelected monarch.

I ask again: would you have preferred a bloody war?

I would not prefer a bloody war. I would prefer King James II bringing order and stability to England by enforcing the law which he was doing. Of course a monarch should obey a countries laws and not act arbitrarily, but the Magna Carta already restrained the monarch from doing that.

Besides, how was King James II abusing his power by protecting the rights of religious minorities in his Kingdoms. That is something you should answer.

Because using his power in a manner opposed to the wishes of the governed is abusing his power, whatever the effects.

So your a fan of tyranny of the majority rather than a monarch who protected the rights of minorities.

I'm not a fan of the UK's system insofar as it has no entrenched protections for rights. But I cannot condone the monarch's unilateral use of power just because I like the effect it happened to have in this instance.

So you believe that minorities should deal with having their rights sacrificed for the ideal of democracy?

No, I think certain matters should be entrenched and beyond the reach of any simple majority to change.

I don't think any of the likely solutions (personal rule, Parliamentary rule, civil war) were particularly good, but of them I would choose the second as the least bad option.
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: Jacob Harrison on May 14, 2018, 11:10:33 pm
And Parliament had no right to overthrow King James II because at that time, the King’s Power legally was over Parliament and King James II didn’t do anything bad. Parliament was against him because he was a Roman Catholic(before Joan of Arc was canonized) and allowed tolerance of Protestant sects that were not Anglican. What was tyrannical about that?

Except that when a single individual (or group thereof--don't think I think all that highly of the House of Lords), unaccountable to the governed, has power over those who are so accountable, that creates a fundamentally unfair and untenable situation that would almost certainly have eventually exploded into civil war had it not been for the Glorious Revolution. Parliament had every moral right to assert its proper authority, as the representatives of the people, over the unelected monarch.

I ask again: would you have preferred a bloody war?

I would not prefer a bloody war. I would prefer King James II bringing order and stability to England by enforcing the law which he was doing. Of course a monarch should obey a countries laws and not act arbitrarily, but the Magna Carta already restrained the monarch from doing that.

Besides, how was King James II abusing his power by protecting the rights of religious minorities in his Kingdoms. That is something you should answer.

Because using his power in a manner opposed to the wishes of the governed is abusing his power, whatever the effects.

So your a fan of tyranny of the majority rather than a monarch who protected the rights of minorities.

I'm not a fan of the UK's system insofar as it has no entrenched protections for rights. But I cannot condone the monarch's unilateral use of power just because I like the effect it happened to have in this instance.

So you believe that minorities should deal with having their rights sacrificed for the ideal of democracy?

No, I think certain matters should be entrenched and beyond the reach of any simple majority to change.

I don't think any of the likely solutions (personal rule, Parliamentary rule, civil war) were particularly good, but of them I would choose the second as the least bad option.

How was it the least bad option? The overthrow of King James II did cause civil war because King James II led the first Jacobite rebellion in Ireland. Then there was a second civil war when Bonnie Prince Charlie led a Jacobite rebellion in Scotland. Personal rule of the monarchs would have prevented the civil war from happening. And I already said that the Magna Carta prevented the monarch from being able to act arbitrarily.
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: davedan on May 14, 2018, 11:22:43 pm
So find yourself a virgin gal into eccentric ex Catholics that hate their ladybits while you fap off to the Levis catalogue. Simples.

I assume he can dry hump the hell out of her. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nTT43Kn-tNM
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: davedan on May 14, 2018, 11:24:07 pm
Yup, back in the day when young virgins were traded as chattel for real estate it was much more feministy.

Uh huh.

And you really don't need to go into any more detail about your fapping, really. We're good. Thanks.

Sex trafficking happens a lot more after the sexual revolution that before it. Teaching men to repress their sexual thoughts is more respectful to women because it is morally wrong to fap to a woman if she doesn’t want you to do so.

I would love to know the statistics of that. But then again I read somewhere that there are more people enslaved now than there were during the trans-atlantic slave trade.
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: Jacob Harrison on May 15, 2018, 12:03:39 am
So find yourself a virgin gal into eccentric ex Catholics that hate their ladybits while you fap off to the Levis catalogue. Simples.

I assume he can dry hump the hell out of her. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nTT43Kn-tNM

BUT I COULD NOT MAKE BABIES WHEN DRY HUMPING A WIFE! Are you even trying to help cure me or are you just trolling?
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: Jacob Harrison on May 15, 2018, 12:07:45 am
Yup, back in the day when young virgins were traded as chattel for real estate it was much more feministy.

Uh huh.

And you really don't need to go into any more detail about your fapping, really. We're good. Thanks.

Sex trafficking happens a lot more after the sexual revolution that before it. Teaching men to repress their sexual thoughts is more respectful to women because it is morally wrong to fap to a woman if she doesn’t want you to do so.

I would love to know the statistics of that. But then again I read somewhere that there are more people enslaved now than there were during the trans-atlantic slave trade.

The scandals involving Harvey Weinstein, and all the people who were hit with the MeeToo movement after the sexual revolution is not enough proof for you.
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: davedan on May 15, 2018, 12:26:23 am
How is Harvey Weinstein or the metoo movement related to sex-trafficking?

And proof of what?
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: davedan on May 15, 2018, 12:27:10 am
So find yourself a virgin gal into eccentric ex Catholics that hate their ladybits while you fap off to the Levis catalogue. Simples.

I assume he can dry hump the hell out of her. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nTT43Kn-tNM

BUT I COULD NOT MAKE BABIES WHEN DRY HUMPING A WIFE! Are you even trying to help cure me or are you just trolling?

No more than you cracker
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: Jacob Harrison on May 15, 2018, 01:24:37 am
So find yourself a virgin gal into eccentric ex Catholics that hate their ladybits while you fap off to the Levis catalogue. Simples.

I assume he can dry hump the hell out of her. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nTT43Kn-tNM

BUT I COULD NOT MAKE BABIES WHEN DRY HUMPING A WIFE! Are you even trying to help cure me or are you just trolling?

No more than you cracker

I am not trying to troll. It is just that I am morally disgusted with how you perverted incels objectify and treat women so I have every right to cast judgement on you, because I avoid masterbation making me more respectful of women and morally superior to you. And I really wish I was cured of my clothing fetish, and if I can’t then I must get rid of my sexual hormones so I get rid of my degenerate temptations to have fantasies about dry humping. I want to be a normal heterosexual.
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: Jacob Harrison on May 15, 2018, 01:33:44 am
How is Harvey Weinstein or the metoo movement related to sex-trafficking?

And proof of what?

It proves that the sexual revolution teaches men to objectify women which causes them to not have moral problems with groping or exploiting women.
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: Tolpuddle Martyr on May 15, 2018, 01:40:37 am
So find yourself a virgin gal into eccentric ex Catholics that hate their ladybits while you fap off to the Levis catalogue. Simples.

I assume he can dry hump the hell out of her. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nTT43Kn-tNM

BUT I COULD NOT MAKE BABIES WHEN DRY HUMPING A WIFE! Are you even trying to help cure me or are you just trolling?
Just make sure your virgin agrees to artificial insemination.

Just a thought, your perfect partner is probably a lesbian. Never touched by a man, wants her own kids. There'd be more than one that'd tick those boxes.

Probably won't want to stick around while you whack off to clothing ads though...
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: davedan on May 15, 2018, 01:43:50 am
So find yourself a virgin gal into eccentric ex Catholics that hate their ladybits while you fap off to the Levis catalogue. Simples.

I assume he can dry hump the hell out of her. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nTT43Kn-tNM

BUT I COULD NOT MAKE BABIES WHEN DRY HUMPING A WIFE! Are you even trying to help cure me or are you just trolling?

No more than you cracker

I am not trying to troll. It is just that I am morally disgusted with how you perverted incels objectify and treat women so I have every right to cast judgement on you, because I avoid masterbation making me more respectful of women and morally superior to you. And I really wish I was cured of my clothing fetish, and if I can’t then I must get rid of my sexual hormones so I get rid of my degenerate temptations to have fantasies about dry humping. I want to be a normal heterosexual.

Which incels? I'm not celibate cracker.
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: davedan on May 15, 2018, 01:44:57 am
How is Harvey Weinstein or the metoo movement related to sex-trafficking?

And proof of what?

It proves that the sexual revolution teaches men to objectify women which causes them to not have moral problems with groping or exploiting women.


There's not enough connection there even to make a non-sequitur.
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: Tolpuddle Martyr on May 15, 2018, 02:03:24 am
Isn't this guy what the incels call a volcel, "voluntary celibate?" His virgin fetish fits in nicely with inceldom though.

Also, how were the ol' rail the virgin you bought with your dowry days not sex trafficking? You do the lassies father a solid and he trafficks his offspring to you to have sexytimes with!
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: Jacob Harrison on May 15, 2018, 02:55:57 am
So find yourself a virgin gal into eccentric ex Catholics that hate their ladybits while you fap off to the Levis catalogue. Simples.

I assume he can dry hump the hell out of her. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nTT43Kn-tNM

BUT I COULD NOT MAKE BABIES WHEN DRY HUMPING A WIFE! Are you even trying to help cure me or are you just trolling?

No more than you cracker

I am not trying to troll. It is just that I am morally disgusted with how you perverted incels objectify and treat women so I have every right to cast judgement on you, because I avoid masterbation making me more respectful of women and morally superior to you. And I really wish I was cured of my clothing fetish, and if I can’t then I must get rid of my sexual hormones so I get rid of my degenerate temptations to have fantasies about dry humping. I want to be a normal heterosexual.

Which incels? I'm not celibate cracker.

The term incel indicate that they are perverts who think that women owe them sex just because they are women and because of that women reject them. I didn’t know that you actually engage in sex. I don’t think that any women owes me sex nor do I owe them sex. Incels are not true celibates because they are not abstaining from repressing their degenerate thoughts. I am volcel not incel, because I want to save myself till marriage. I am saying that marital sex for the purpose of procreation, is the best sex because it makes sex more romantic and personal and it fulfills the scientific biological purpose of sex which is procreation. If you understand biology and the laws of nature, our sex hormones are our biological evolutionary instincts that it telling us to produce children. Why go against the laws of nature?

During times that women are not available for sex you probably masterbate thinking about women you know, even if she is a volcel and does not want you to masterbate to her. Why don’t you think about how a volcel women would feel if she knew that you were masterbating to her?
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: davedan on May 15, 2018, 03:11:27 am
Why are you so interested in my masturbating?
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: Tolpuddle Martyr on May 15, 2018, 03:11:34 am
If you are voluntarily celibate then your first hand experience of just how awesome and romantic it ia to reluctantly masturbate in order to impregnate your jean-jacket wearing virgin bride is entirely nil.
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: Jacob Harrison on May 15, 2018, 03:22:30 am
Isn't this guy what the incels call a volcel, "voluntary celibate?" His virgin fetish fits in nicely with inceldom though.

Also, how were the ol' rail the virgin you bought with your dowry days not sex trafficking? You do the lassies father a solid and he trafficks his offspring to you to have sexytimes with!

Isn't this guy what the incels call a volcel, "voluntary celibate?" His virgin fetish fits in nicely with inceldom though.

Also, how were the ol' rail the virgin you bought with your dowry days not sex trafficking? You do the lassies father a solid and he trafficks his offspring to you to have sexytimes with!

That happened in the degenerate Southern Democrat States where slave owners considered both their female slaves and another father’s daughter their property. I do not condone that at all. In the Northern Republican States, the tradition was that men and women virgins consensually agreed to marry and they then got approval from their parents from both families. That was also the case in Merry Old England. It was the Puritans like Cromwell that were fanatical and forced women to cover up and not wear makeup. I don’t mind women wearing bikinis, jeans, shorts etc. I only have a problem when men and women dress slutty for the purpose of trying to have promiscuous sex because it makes volcel women feel uncomfortable and it exposes young children to sexuality at too young an age. It is a slippery slope to public nudity becoming legal. 
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: Jacob Harrison on May 15, 2018, 03:30:27 am
Why are you so interested in my masturbating?

Because you don’t realize how it is perverted and disrespectful to masterbate to a women who does not know that you are masterbating to her.
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: Tolpuddle Martyr on May 15, 2018, 03:31:15 am
You have a really romantic view of things you have absolutely no lived experience of.
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: Jacob Harrison on May 15, 2018, 03:38:02 am
You have a really romantic view of things you have absolutely no lived experience of.

Because I have romantic thoughts on a future ideal wife. There is a difference between romantic love, and sexual sensation. I just want to be romantic in a respectful non objectifying manner. I am also bothered by how you think it is morally ok to masterbate to a woman who you don’t know wants you to masterbate to her. Why do you assume that all women don’t mind you masterbating to them?
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: Tolpuddle Martyr on May 15, 2018, 03:47:42 am
You have a really romantic view of things you have absolutely no lived experience of.

Because I have romantic thoughts on a future ideal wife. There is a difference between romantic love, and sexual sensation. I just want to be romantic in a respectful non objectifying manner.
How would you know? You haven't had either!

Mind you, you haven't lived in a monarchy or a society where people still trade kids like Pokemon and that never stopped you waxing lyrical about that!
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: Jacob Harrison on May 15, 2018, 03:50:49 am
If you are voluntarily celibate then your first hand experience of just how awesome and romantic it ia to reluctantly masturbate in order to impregnate your jean-jacket wearing virgin bride is entirely nil.

I want to have NORMAL sexuality so that I can find a sexually NORMAL Christian virgin that I can politely talk too. I want NORMAL sex.
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: Tolpuddle Martyr on May 15, 2018, 04:07:47 am
Just a heads up, "normal" sex between men and women often involves touching vaginas at some point!
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: Jacob Harrison on May 15, 2018, 04:15:41 am
You have a really romantic view of things you have absolutely no lived experience of.

Because I have romantic thoughts on a future ideal wife. There is a difference between romantic love, and sexual sensation. I just want to be romantic in a respectful non objectifying manner.
How would you know? You haven't had either!

Mind you, you haven't lived in a monarchy or a society where people still trade kids like Pokemon and that never stopped you waxing lyrical about that!

I don’t know because I am cursed with a fetish that is beyond my control. And I already addressed what you said about sex trafficking.

“That happened in the degenerate Southern Democrat States where slave owners considered both their female slaves and another father’s daughter their property. I do not condone that at all. In the Northern Republican States, the tradition was that men and women virgins consensually agreed to marry and they then got approval from their parents from both families. That was also the case in Merry Old England. It was the Puritans like Cromwell that were fanatical and forced women to cover up and not wear makeup. I don’t mind women wearing makeup, bikinis, jeans, shorts etc. I only have a problem when men and women dress slutty for the purpose of trying to have promiscuous sex because it makes volcel women feel uncomfortable and it exposes young children to sexuality at too young an age. It is a slippery slope to public nudity becoming legal.”
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: Jacob Harrison on May 15, 2018, 04:26:27 am
Just a heads up, "normal" sex between men and women often involves touching vaginas at some point!

I KNOW that. I am saying that I WANT TO BE CURED OF MY FUCKING FETISH THAT I AM CURSED WITH!
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: Jacob Harrison on May 15, 2018, 04:35:39 am
You still haven’t addressed my point on how there are volcel women who do not want you to masterbate to them. And another point, is that if the woman is a not a virgin, then why should I trust that she is not going to cheat on me?
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: Tolpuddle Martyr on May 15, 2018, 04:43:50 am
You still haven’t addressed my point on how there are volcel women who do not want you to masterbate to them. And another point, is that if the woman is a not a virgin, then why should I trust that she is not going to cheat on me?
Oh that point, your speculation on our masturbation habits comes from the same expanse of fuck all as your first hand knowledge of romantic vs non romantic sex.

Also your correlation between virginity and fidelity is similarly ungrounded in anything substantial.

I'm not a shrink, if you want help with your sex fetish problems go to one. Preferably with a receptive attitude towards evidence based advice or the treatment won't work!
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: Jacob Harrison on May 15, 2018, 05:14:17 am
You still haven’t addressed my point on how there are volcel women who do not want you to masterbate to them. And another point, is that if the woman is a not a virgin, then why should I trust that she is not going to cheat on me?
Oh that point, your speculation on our masturbation habits comes from the same expanse of fuck all as your first hand knowledge of romantic vs non romantic sex.

Also your correlation between virginity and fidelity is similarly ungrounded in anything substantial.

I'm not a shrink, if you want help with your sex fetish problems go to one. Preferably with a receptive attitude towards evidence based advice or the treatment won't work!


I know how to use common sense. You may masterbate thinking of a woman who does not mind, but that does not mean that other men do not masterbate thinking of women who they don’t know for sure give consent. There are some men who have trouble controlling their fantasies, so teaching males to stop masterbating prevents them from going down the path of perversion.

The problem is that the treatment would likely involve a doctor having me masterbate to the fetish which I cannot do because of my moral values. So if I can’t cure my fetish without commiting immoral behavoir, then don’t you think that chemical castration is a better solution for me. You would condemn me for masterbating to the fetish so using your logic, is castration better than masterbation?
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: Tolpuddle Martyr on May 15, 2018, 05:56:00 am
Is permanently losing a major organ better than having a wank? Ponders.

No, no it's not! But that's subjective, you want a castration. Go right ahead. You'd complain less about fapping because you couldn't.

But y'know all this reproduction stuff you wanna do with your denim concubine depends on the same spunk you're spilling on the ground, yeah?
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: Jacob Harrison on May 15, 2018, 08:29:22 am
Is permanently losing a major organ better than having a wank? Ponders.

No, no it's not! But that's subjective, you want a castration. Go right ahead. You'd complain less about fapping because you couldn't.

But y'know all this reproduction stuff you wanna do with your denim concubine depends on the same spunk you're spilling on the ground, yeah?

Is permanently losing a major organ better than having a wank? Ponders.

No, no it's not! But that's subjective, you want a castration. Go right ahead. You'd complain less about fapping because you couldn't.

But y'know all this reproduction stuff you wanna do with your denim concubine depends on the same spunk you're spilling on the ground, yeah?

1. But don’t you think that I deserve a castration for having such degenerate temptations? Are you telling me to stay degenerate

2. Evidence that I am a victim of the sexual revolution is my past experience since my childhood that made me turned on by women wearing jeans. Instead of treating their jeans as simple clothes like the sane volcel females did, they used their jeans to flaunt their sexuality. For example, many shake their asses while wearing jeans. I couldn’t help but get a fucking erection as I am typing this. But I restrained my arms from touching my penis because I know better than to give in to perversion. If you ever read Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde you’ll get the idea. Dr. Jekyll’s mistake was allowing Hyde to flourish instead of taking responsibility to repress it.

3. I feel ashamed of my degenerate temptations so while I ideally would like to reproduce in a normal way, I would feel like castrating myself is a good form of penance and will lessen the debt of my sins. When artificial wombs are available for humans, I could create clone children by taking a swab of DNA from my cheek and inserting it into the artificial womb to create a bunch of clone children. I will raise them to be greater than me because they won’t have the degenerate tendencies. Nobody will have the legal or moral right to stop me.
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: Tolpuddle Martyr on May 15, 2018, 04:54:26 pm
Is permanently losing a major organ better than having a wank? Ponders.

No, no it's not! But that's subjective, you want a castration. Go right ahead. You'd complain less about fapping because you couldn't.

But y'know all this reproduction stuff you wanna do with your denim concubine depends on the same spunk you're spilling on the ground, yeah?

Is permanently losing a major organ better than having a wank? Ponders.

No, no it's not! But that's subjective, you want a castration. Go right ahead. You'd complain less about fapping because you couldn't.

But y'know all this reproduction stuff you wanna do with your denim concubine depends on the same spunk you're spilling on the ground, yeah?

1. But don’t you think that I deserve a castration for having such degenerate temptations? Are you telling me to stay degenerate

2. Evidence that I am a victim of the sexual revolution is my past experience since my childhood that made me turned on by women wearing jeans. Instead of treating their jeans as simple clothes like the sane volcel females did, they used their jeans to flaunt their sexuality. For example, many shake their asses while wearing jeans. I couldn’t help but get a fucking erection as I am typing this. But I restrained my arms from touching my penis because I know better than to give in to perversion. If you ever read Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde you’ll get the idea. Dr. Jekyll’s mistake was allowing Hyde to flourish instead of taking responsibility to repress it.

3. I feel ashamed of my degenerate temptations so while I ideally would like to reproduce in a normal way, I would feel like castrating myself is a good form of penance and will lessen the debt of my sins. When artificial wombs are available for humans, I could create clone children by taking a swab of DNA from my cheek and inserting it into the artificial womb to create a bunch of clone children. I will raise them to be greater than me because they won’t have the degenerate tendencies. Nobody will have the legal or moral right to stop me.
Being turned on by a cute babe in tight jeans is fine and perfectly normal, relax.

"Degenerate" is Nazi code for "not meeting impossible standards" chill, have a wank FFS. Maybe even meet some consenting lass wearing sexy jeans and have sexytimes. You're having a fuss over nothing!
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: davedan on May 15, 2018, 06:17:35 pm
Why are you so interested in my masturbating?

Because you don’t realize how it is perverted and disrespectful to masterbate to a women who does not know that you are masterbating to her.

I think you'll find the volcel women are masturbating to me cracker.
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: Jacob Harrison on May 15, 2018, 08:02:56 pm
Is permanently losing a major organ better than having a wank? Ponders.

No, no it's not! But that's subjective, you want a castration. Go right ahead. You'd complain less about fapping because you couldn't.

But y'know all this reproduction stuff you wanna do with your denim concubine depends on the same spunk you're spilling on the ground, yeah?

Is permanently losing a major organ better than having a wank? Ponders.

No, no it's not! But that's subjective, you want a castration. Go right ahead. You'd complain less about fapping because you couldn't.

But y'know all this reproduction stuff you wanna do with your denim concubine depends on the same spunk you're spilling on the ground, yeah?

1. But don’t you think that I deserve a castration for having such degenerate temptations? Are you telling me to stay degenerate

2. Evidence that I am a victim of the sexual revolution is my past experience since my childhood that made me turned on by women wearing jeans. Instead of treating their jeans as simple clothes like the sane volcel females did, they used their jeans to flaunt their sexuality. For example, many shake their asses while wearing jeans. I couldn’t help but get a fucking erection as I am typing this. But I restrained my arms from touching my penis because I know better than to give in to perversion. If you ever read Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde you’ll get the idea. Dr. Jekyll’s mistake was allowing Hyde to flourish instead of taking responsibility to repress it.

3. I feel ashamed of my degenerate temptations so while I ideally would like to reproduce in a normal way, I would feel like castrating myself is a good form of penance and will lessen the debt of my sins. When artificial wombs are available for humans, I could create clone children by taking a swab of DNA from my cheek and inserting it into the artificial womb to create a bunch of clone children. I will raise them to be greater than me because they won’t have the degenerate tendencies. Nobody will have the legal or moral right to stop me.
Being turned on by a cute babe in tight jeans is fine and perfectly normal, relax.

"Degenerate" is Nazi code for "not meeting impossible standards" chill, have a wank FFS. Maybe even meet some consenting lass wearing sexy jeans and have sexytimes. You're having a fuss over nothing!

It is not normal because first of all, it is so bad that I can’t get turned on by vaginas  and most women including Christian women like to have normal naked penis+vagina sex. It is the most natural because genitals are what produce children! I want to broaden my dating options to include normal conservative  Orthodox, or Anglican women! I want to meet the standards of conservatives.

It is not impossible standards. You can stop being degenerate if you stop masterbating and focus on doing other things in life. It is a choice of free will. How could I restrain myself from thinking sexually of vocel women in modest jeans who as I said before DO NOT WANT men to think sexually of them. How could I restrain myself of thinking sexually of young female teachers from high school, and other people’s girlfriend’s and wives wearing jeans.
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: Tolpuddle Martyr on May 15, 2018, 11:01:27 pm
"Modest" Jeans-is that a burqa made of denim?

Also, fetishes are pretty harmless. So long as it doesn't involve kids, the unwilling or the dead I couldn't give a toss.

Necrophilia isn't as morally wrong as rape or child molesting but it's terrible taste at your grannies wake-however awesone she told ypu sex was back in the day!

If you want to beat yourself up over arbitrary standards designed by and for folks who aren't you-go nuts. It's your call.
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: Jacob Harrison on May 16, 2018, 12:35:51 am
"Modest" Jeans-is that a burqa made of denim?

Also, fetishes are pretty harmless. So long as it doesn't involve kids, the unwilling or the dead I couldn't give a toss.

Necrophilia isn't as morally wrong as rape or child molesting but it's terrible taste at your grannies wake-however awesone she told ypu sex was back in the day!

If you want to beat yourself up over arbitrary standards designed by and for folks who aren't you-go nuts. It's your call.

Necrophilia is not as morally wrong but that does not make it mortally ok. Jeans should not be objectified as being something sexual. Women should not have to deal with men objectifying them over normal clothes. I can’t stand it when sexists complain about women wearing trousers. I am unfortunetely not extremely ugly, so I want to have the moral high ground when I hear girls talk about how I am cute behind my back and confront them, standing up for myself. If I become  asexual, then girls will have no right to objectify me.

Husbands and wives naturally feel upset by the idea of other people having sexual thoughts about their spouses.

Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: Jacob Harrison on May 16, 2018, 12:51:05 am
Why are you so interested in my masturbating?

Because you don’t realize how it is perverted and disrespectful to masterbate to a women who does not know that you are masterbating to her.

I think you'll find the volcel women are masturbating to me cracker.

Why do you assume that no volcel women exist.
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: davedan on May 16, 2018, 02:27:20 am
Why are you so interested in my masturbating?

Because you don’t realize how it is perverted and disrespectful to masterbate to a women who does not know that you are masterbating to her.

I think you'll find the volcel women are masturbating to me cracker.

Why do you assume that no volcel women exist.

why do you not accept the fact that volcel women all masturbate while imagining me.
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: Art Vandelay on May 16, 2018, 03:30:11 am
Personally, I masturbate when women think about a volcel Davedan.
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: davedan on May 16, 2018, 03:32:22 am
so you masturbate to women's tears as they cry to the concept of me withdrawing my incredible sexuality from their availability.
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: Jacob Harrison on May 16, 2018, 08:25:23 am
so you masturbate to women's tears as they cry to the concept of me withdrawing my incredible sexuality from their availability.

I don’t masterbate to women’s tears. I just think that women and men who objectify me deserve punishment for objectifying me. I am telling you that it is a sign of maturity and machoism to not give into perverted temptations and focuss on doing better more productive things such as getting a job, giving to charity, or doing other creative things. I would behave the same way if I was asexual. As I keep saying, what if a particular women DOES NOT WANT YOU TO MASTERBATE TO HER! You should then respect her and stop doing it! God is angry at you for not respecting volcels. However since you have not done any sin serious enough to be beyond redemption, God still loves you and wants you to change your ways. Many girls at my college talk about perverted men including a 19 year old Christian mother who was talking about a man who flirted with her while she was taking care of her baby.

Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: Jacob Harrison on May 16, 2018, 08:26:32 am
Why are you so interested in my masturbating?

Because you don’t realize how it is perverted and disrespectful to masterbate to a women who does not know that you are masterbating to her.

I think you'll find the volcel women are masturbating to me cracker.

Why do you assume that no volcel women exist.

why do you not accept the fact that volcel women all masturbate while imagining me.

Why do you assume that all of them do that?
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: Tolpuddle Martyr on May 16, 2018, 08:45:43 am
Necrophilia is not as morally wrong but that does not make it mortally ok.

As opposed to necrophiles finding mortality OK?
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: Jacob Harrison on May 16, 2018, 09:07:15 am
Necrophilia is not as morally wrong but that does not make it mortally ok.

As opposed to necrophiles finding mortality OK?

I meant to say morally ok. I am having trouble spelling because I have a chronic issue of major sleep deprivation. It is temporarily affecting my cognitive functioning skills.
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: Art Vandelay on May 16, 2018, 09:47:03 am
so you masturbate to women's tears as they cry to the concept of me withdrawing my incredible sexuality from their availability.
But of course.
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: Jacob Harrison on May 16, 2018, 09:51:31 am
so you masturbate to women's tears as they cry to the concept of me withdrawing my incredible sexuality from their availability.
But of course.

So you didn’t even read my response to that.
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: Art Vandelay on May 16, 2018, 09:58:17 am
so you masturbate to women's tears as they cry to the concept of me withdrawing my incredible sexuality from their availability.
But of course.

So you didn’t even read my response to that.

Oh, I did. However, my meat beating habits shall remain unchanged.
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: Jacob Harrison on May 16, 2018, 11:50:06 am
so you masturbate to women's tears as they cry to the concept of me withdrawing my incredible sexuality from their availability.
But of course.

So you didn’t even read my response to that.

Oh, I did. However, my meat beating habits shall remain unchanged.

Wow. So even though many women talk about perverted creepy men, you still won’t change your ways. So you think it is ok to walk up to a woman and say “Hey nice boobs” or “nice ass,” even if they don’t want you to do that? Why do you think that Homer Simpson is a man of virtue? The show the Simpsons is supposed to make fun of depraved people. I feel that like women, I have a right to tell perverts to stop objectifying me.
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: Tolpuddle Martyr on May 16, 2018, 05:23:32 pm
That's very true, when Jake here railed his granny at her wake he never said anything so ungentlemanly or crass to her.

Just a quick peck on the forehead and then straight through her modest denim overalls!
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: davedan on May 16, 2018, 06:53:20 pm
Why are you so interested in my masturbating?

Because you don’t realize how it is perverted and disrespectful to masterbate to a women who does not know that you are masterbating to her.

I think you'll find the volcel women are masturbating to me cracker.

Why do you assume that no volcel women exist.

why do you not accept the fact that volcel women all masturbate while imagining me.

Why do you assume that all of them do that?

They ring me while they do it. I'm constantly having to listen to them pleasure themselves while talking dirty to me about their voluntary celibacy. They even call me at work. I can't even take my kids to the park without some volcel woman bailing me up and telling me how when she thinks about me she touches herself.
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: davedan on May 16, 2018, 06:57:00 pm
so you masturbate to women's tears as they cry to the concept of me withdrawing my incredible sexuality from their availability.

I don’t masterbate to women’s tears. I just think that women and men who objectify me deserve punishment for objectifying me. I am telling you that it is a sign of maturity and machoism to not give into perverted temptations and focuss on doing better more productive things such as getting a job, giving to charity, or doing other creative things. I would behave the same way if I was asexual. As I keep saying, what if a particular women DOES NOT WANT YOU TO MASTERBATE TO HER! You should then respect her and stop doing it! God is angry at you for not respecting volcels. However since you have not done any sin serious enough to be beyond redemption, God still loves you and wants you to change your ways. Many girls at my college talk about perverted men including a 19 year old Christian mother who was talking about a man who flirted with her while she was taking care of her baby.

We weren't talking to you cracker. This is between me Art, Art's meat and women getting upset when I deny them a taste of hot steamy squirrel. But I think it's really nice that you go around telling women how you would like to masturbate to them and asking if that's ok. I mean they might be non-celibate or even promiscuous yet not want a spaced out Crypto-Anglican with a masturbation and castration fetish telling them about how he wants to blow a wad onto their modest, yet provocative, blue jeans
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: Jacob Harrison on May 16, 2018, 08:35:05 pm
so you masturbate to women's tears as they cry to the concept of me withdrawing my incredible sexuality from their availability.

I don’t masterbate to women’s tears. I just think that women and men who objectify me deserve punishment for objectifying me. I am telling you that it is a sign of maturity and machoism to not give into perverted temptations and focuss on doing better more productive things such as getting a job, giving to charity, or doing other creative things. I would behave the same way if I was asexual. As I keep saying, what if a particular women DOES NOT WANT YOU TO MASTERBATE TO HER! You should then respect her and stop doing it! God is angry at you for not respecting volcels. However since you have not done any sin serious enough to be beyond redemption, God still loves you and wants you to change your ways. Many girls at my college talk about perverted men including a 19 year old Christian mother who was talking about a man who flirted with her while she was taking care of her baby.

We weren't talking to you cracker. This is between me Art, Art's meat and women getting upset when I deny them a taste of hot steamy squirrel. But I think it's really nice that you go around telling women how you would like to masturbate to them and asking if that's ok. I mean they might be non-celibate or even promiscuous yet not want a spaced out Crypto-Anglican with a masturbation and castration fetish telling them about how he wants to blow a wad onto their modest, yet provocative, blue jeans

I do not go around telling women that I would like to masterbate to them. I keep my fetish to myself and feel ashamed of myself for being sexually turned on by blue jeans. Jeans are supposed to me more modest than bikinis. I reveal my darker secrets more on the internet than in real life. I am extremely shy and socially awkward in real life. I keep my sexual preferences in the closet. I hear women talk about creeps all the time. Things are so awkward that I am afraid of staring at a woman in fear of looking creepy and avoid eye contact with them. Nobody ever taught me how to flirt in a non creepy way. I have good ears and am naturally able to eavesdrop on other people’s conversions. So do you condemn a woman who tells you to fuck off when you flirt with her? If so then you are the real sexist. And how do you know if she is not a victim of sexual assault or even rape?

For example, many consider Anakin Skywalker to be a pervert in Attack of the Clones.

I am a right wing social justice warrior who has ideas on how I can force decency on others for the greater good of society. Since my sins are not as bad as other people’s sins, it gives me every right to condemn them. Jesus said that is wrong if you condemn someone who has a speck in their eye if you have a plank in yours. However I have a speck in my eye and see the planks in other peoples eyes. In fact I condemn Christians who are hypocrites.

The “champion of atheism” TJ Kirk AKA “The Amazing Atheist” told an actual rape victim on reddit that she deserved it and threatened to rape her again. Why don’t you atheists boycott his channel? Why is he not quoted on sexists say the darndest things.

Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: Art Vandelay on May 16, 2018, 08:37:56 pm
so you masturbate to women's tears as they cry to the concept of me withdrawing my incredible sexuality from their availability.
But of course.

So you didn’t even read my response to that.

Oh, I did. However, my meat beating habits shall remain unchanged.

Wow. So even though many women talk about perverted creepy men, you still won’t change your ways. So you think it is ok to walk up to a woman and say “Hey nice boobs” or “nice ass,” even if they don’t want you to do that? Why do you think that Homer Simpson is a man of virtue? The show the Simpsons is supposed to make fun of depraved people. I feel that like women, I have a right to tell perverts to stop objectifying me.

Hey, you watch yourself. I'll not have you talking shit about Homer Simpson, the greatest ever example of masculinity, strength and intellect in human history. A man whose influence of culture all around the world has continued through the generations to this very day. Knock that shit off right now, or I swear to Satan I will not come over there and cut your balls off while dressed as a clown.
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: Jacob Harrison on May 16, 2018, 09:13:12 pm
so you masturbate to women's tears as they cry to the concept of me withdrawing my incredible sexuality from their availability.
But of course.

So you didn’t even read my response to that.

Oh, I did. However, my meat beating habits shall remain unchanged.

Wow. So even though many women talk about perverted creepy men, you still won’t change your ways. So you think it is ok to walk up to a woman and say “Hey nice boobs” or “nice ass,” even if they don’t want you to do that? Why do you think that Homer Simpson is a man of virtue? The show the Simpsons is supposed to make fun of depraved people. I feel that like women, I have a right to tell perverts to stop objectifying me.

Hey, you watch yourself. I'll not have you talking shit about Homer Simpson, the greatest ever example of masculinity, strength and intellect in human history. A man whose influence of culture all around the world has continued through the generations to this very day. Knock that shit off right now, or I swear to Satan I will not come over there and cut your balls off while dressed as a clown.

Oh. I thought that making you angry would give you more incentive to attack me.
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: Art Vandelay on May 16, 2018, 09:32:52 pm
so you masturbate to women's tears as they cry to the concept of me withdrawing my incredible sexuality from their availability.
But of course.

So you didn’t even read my response to that.

Oh, I did. However, my meat beating habits shall remain unchanged.

Wow. So even though many women talk about perverted creepy men, you still won’t change your ways. So you think it is ok to walk up to a woman and say “Hey nice boobs” or “nice ass,” even if they don’t want you to do that? Why do you think that Homer Simpson is a man of virtue? The show the Simpsons is supposed to make fun of depraved people. I feel that like women, I have a right to tell perverts to stop objectifying me.

Hey, you watch yourself. I'll not have you talking shit about Homer Simpson, the greatest ever example of masculinity, strength and intellect in human history. A man whose influence of culture all around the world has continued through the generations to this very day. Knock that shit off right now, or I swear to Satan I will not come over there and cut your balls off while dressed as a clown.

Oh. I thought that making you angry would give you more incentive to attack me.

No, if you piss me off, I'll break into your room and replace your wallpaper with the women's section of the Levis catalogue. See, I know your weaknesses.
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: davedan on May 16, 2018, 09:42:11 pm
Oh no
(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: Art Vandelay on May 16, 2018, 09:55:23 pm
I'm not sure what's bluer. Those jeans or Monsieur Harrison's balls.
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: Jacob Harrison on May 17, 2018, 05:38:04 am
so you masturbate to women's tears as they cry to the concept of me withdrawing my incredible sexuality from their availability.
But of course.

So you didn’t even read my response to that.

Oh, I did. However, my meat beating habits shall remain unchanged.

Wow. So even though many women talk about perverted creepy men, you still won’t change your ways. So you think it is ok to walk up to a woman and say “Hey nice boobs” or “nice ass,” even if they don’t want you to do that? Why do you think that Homer Simpson is a man of virtue? The show the Simpsons is supposed to make fun of depraved people. I feel that like women, I have a right to tell perverts to stop objectifying me.

Hey, you watch yourself. I'll not have you talking shit about Homer Simpson, the greatest ever example of masculinity, strength and intellect in human history. A man whose influence of culture all around the world has continued through the generations to this very day. Knock that shit off right now, or I swear to Satan I will not come over there and cut your balls off while dressed as a clown.

Oh. I thought that making you angry would give you more incentive to attack me.

No, if you piss me off, I'll break into your room and replace your wallpaper with the women's section of the Levis catalogue. See, I know your weaknesses.

But wouldn’t me getting mutilated be a more severe punishment?
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: Art Vandelay on May 17, 2018, 06:15:51 am
But wouldn’t me getting mutilated be a more severe punishment?

Would it? Would it really?
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: Jacob Harrison on May 17, 2018, 07:00:04 am
But wouldn’t me getting mutilated be a more severe punishment?

Would it? Would it really?

I am starting to realize that since the Kings of Merry Old England masterbated in private, it is better if I masterbate in private as long as I do it to control my sexual urges and not be open about it. As long as I confess to Anglican priests, I will be forgiven by God. It is fine if women talk about me to each other as long as they don’t do it in front of me. My advice to you is to keep your sexual urges to yourself. Do not be perverted around women. Be civil when flirting with them or chatting with them online. You can’t control your thoughts but you can control your actions. I don’t think I will ever be able to flirt with them without being seen as a creep. And confess your sins to decent Anglican or Orthodox Priests. The pedophilia scandal was rampant in the Catholic Church not the other churches.

I apologize for my behavoir. It is just that I have had major mental illness problems and trauma from my parent’s arguing. My dad blames my mom for my problems and acts hypocritical.
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: Art Vandelay on May 17, 2018, 07:21:25 am
So you don't want me to chop your man berries off? You're breaking my heart, man, you're breaking my heart.
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: davedan on May 17, 2018, 07:58:18 am
Look I am only prepared to accept your apology if you stop thinking about me when you masturbate cracker.
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: Tolpuddle Martyr on May 17, 2018, 08:09:18 am
...it is better if I masterbate in private...

Dude, you've been publicly wanking all over this forum about your wicked wenches in Dad jeans since you got here!

Here ya go, bust (another) nut. Our May calendar girl features modest-yet-practical Bisley drill pants, sensible construction shoes and shirt with a very modest reinforced plastic hat.

(https://ssli.ebayimg.com/images/g/wG8AAOSw8zNa-M5j/s-l640.jpg)

Is that King Charlie's scepter in your hand or are you just pleased to see us, Jackie?
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: Jacob Harrison on May 17, 2018, 11:55:30 am
So you don't want me to chop your man berries off? You're breaking my heart, man, you're breaking my heart.

Well other commenters tell me of the risk of infection, or bleeding to death. I do not know how experienced you are at doing it. I mean if I die from the injuries, then I would go to hell for commiting suicide. Besides I do not trust if you will keep your word when I pay you money. I mean, I would certainly never castrate someone who asked me to do so.

Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: Jacob Harrison on May 17, 2018, 12:07:15 pm
Look I am only prepared to accept your apology if you stop thinking about me when you masturbate cracker.

I do not masterbate to you. I just feel angry when you act perverted around woman who do not want you to do so. You and others keep bombarding me with sexual jokes.

The reason why I was talking to you is because I feel more comfortable talking to males my age about it, then adults like psychiatrists who would say that my fetish is not curable. Why can’t hospitals provide people with castration surgery, if they provide people with other hormonal changes like transgender surgery.
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: Jacob Harrison on May 17, 2018, 12:12:14 pm
...it is better if I masterbate in private...

Dude, you've been publicly wanking all over this forum about your wicked wenches in Dad jeans since you got here!

Here ya go, bust (another) nut. Our May calendar girl features modest-yet-practical Bisley drill pants, sensible construction shoes and shirt with a very modest reinforced plastic hat.

(https://ssli.ebayimg.com/images/g/wG8AAOSw8zNa-M5j/s-l640.jpg)

Is that King Charlie's scepter in your hand or are you just pleased to see us, Jackie?

I am not turned on by that picture because she is not wearing the tight jeans that many girls wear.
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: Jacob Harrison on May 17, 2018, 12:30:12 pm
Why are you so interested in my masturbating?

Because you don’t realize how it is perverted and disrespectful to masterbate to a women who does not know that you are masterbating to her.

I think you'll find the volcel women are masturbating to me cracker.

Why do you assume that no volcel women exist.

why do you not accept the fact that volcel women all masturbate while imagining me.

Why do you assume that all of them do that?

They ring me while they do it. I'm constantly having to listen to them pleasure themselves while talking dirty to me about their voluntary celibacy. They even call me at work. I can't even take my kids to the park without some volcel woman bailing me up and telling me how when she thinks about me she touches herself.

Right. I have the same problem. People don’t keep their degenerate thoughts to themselves. Why can’t people restrain themselves in public. Openness about sex today has gone to far.
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: Skybison on May 17, 2018, 02:36:03 pm
^ I know right.  I was just outside and I could see the ankle's of at least five men.  Those whores should cover themselves up.
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: Jacob Harrison on May 17, 2018, 03:55:25 pm
^ I know right.  I was just outside and I could see the ankle's of at least five men.  Those whores should cover themselves up.

No that is not what I am saying. Your spinning what I am saying. I am saying that BOTH men and women should at least wear a shirt, and hide their private parts. They should not delibaretely entice people of the opposite gender. For example, if a man shows a women his junk, she will find it disgusting. So therefore a woman should not show a man her junk. And there are children out in public as well. They should not have to deal with seeing such obscenity. How don’t you see how it is disgusting for someone to shake their ass in front of a child? Does dress code matter? This is a woman that I consider to be modest. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Rs4Eqxow5PM
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: Tolpuddle Martyr on May 17, 2018, 04:46:08 pm
^ I know right.  I was just outside and I could see the ankle's of at least five men.  Those whores should cover themselves up.

No that is not what I am saying. Your spinning what I am saying. I am saying that BOTH men and women should at least wear a shirt, and hide their private parts. They should not delibaretely entice people of the opposite gender. For example, if a man shows a women his junk, she will find it disgusting. So therefore a woman should not show a man her junk. And there are children out in public as well. They should not have to deal with seeing such obscenity. How don’t you see how it is disgusting for someone to shake their ass in front of a child? Does dress code matter? This is a woman that I consider to be modest. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Rs4Eqxow5PM
BARE ARMS, I can see that alt-right harlots arms. I feel traumatised, quickly, to my side with the smelling salts!
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: Skybison on May 17, 2018, 05:27:51 pm
^ I know right.  I was just outside and I could see the ankle's of at least five men.  Those whores should cover themselves up.

No that is not what I am saying. Your spinning what I am saying. I am saying that BOTH men and women should at least wear a shirt, and hide their private parts. They should not delibaretely entice people of the opposite gender. For example, if a man shows a women his junk, she will find it disgusting. So therefore a woman should not show a man her junk. And there are children out in public as well. They should not have to deal with seeing such obscenity. How don’t you see how it is disgusting for someone to shake their ass in front of a child? Does dress code matter? This is a woman that I consider to be modest. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Rs4Eqxow5PM

I honestly just don't see it.  It's very rare to see people not covering their chests and sex organs.  You just come off as freaking out over something that barely exists and acting like everyone does it.
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: davedan on May 17, 2018, 07:28:38 pm
Look I am only prepared to accept your apology if you stop thinking about me when you masturbate cracker.

I do not masterbate to you. I just feel angry when you act perverted around woman who do not want you to do so. You and others keep bombarding me with sexual jokes.

The reason why I was talking to you is because I feel more comfortable talking to males my age about it, then adults like psychiatrists who would say that my fetish is not curable. Why can’t hospitals provide people with castration surgery, if they provide people with other hormonal changes like transgender surgery.

I asked you to stop Masturbating to me, why won't you listen?

Also:

What makes you think I act perverted around women?
What makes you think I am a male around your age?

And -
(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: Tolpuddle Martyr on May 17, 2018, 08:08:51 pm
Do Anglicanised ex Catholics say "Mea Culpa" when caught masturbating to denim?

Or do they prefer the more Anglican "Dreadfully sorry old bean, I was merely adjusting my jodhpurs when the fair young maiden in the faberges caught my eye..."
Title: Re: A RECENT SIGNIFICANT THING REGARDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM!
Post by: Art Vandelay on May 17, 2018, 09:59:23 pm
So you don't want me to chop your man berries off? You're breaking my heart, man, you're breaking my heart.

Well other commenters tell me of the risk of infection, or bleeding to death. I do not know how experienced you are at doing it. I mean if I die from the injuries, then I would go to hell for commiting suicide. Besides I do not trust if you will keep your word when I pay you money. I mean, I would certainly never castrate someone who asked me to do so.

That hurts my feelings.