In the state of Massachusetts this year, there are the elections for governor, US senator, and 3 ballot questions on issues.
For Governor, I am relunctantly voting for Charlie Baker even though he is a RINO(Republican in Name Only) cuckservative who didn’t endorse Trump, because he is better than Jay Gonzalez, a Democrat becoming Governor.
For Senator I am voting for Geoff Diehl. Hopefully he will win against Senator Warren.
Now here are my positions on the ballot questions.
Question 1:This proposed law would limit how many patients could be assigned to each registered nurse in Massachusetts hospitals and certain other health care facilities.
I am voting no, because it would be a disaster. Most hospitals in Massachusetts are against it, many nurses are against it, and even the liberal Boston Globe is against it. In emergencies where many patients need medical care, nurses would need to take care of more patients than they normally would, so the law would be bad for the patients.
This proposed law would create a citizens commission to consider and recommend potential amendments to the United States Constitution to establish that corporations do not have the same Constitutional rights as human beings and that campaign contributions and expenditures may be regulated.
I am voting yes, because in order to drain the swamp, we need to regulate campaign contributions and expenditures.
This law prohibits discrimination based on gender identity in a person’s admission to or treatment in any place of public accommodation. The law requires any such place that has separate areas for males and females (such as restrooms) to allow access to and full use of those areas consistent with a person’s gender identity. The law also prohibits the owner or manager of a place of public accommodation from using advertising or signage that discriminates on the basis of gender identity.
A YES VOTE would keep in place the current law, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of gender identity in places of public accommodation.
A NO VOTE would repeal this provision of the public accommodation law.
I am definetely voting no, because it is creepy for males and females who identify with the opposite gender to be using the restrooms of the opposite gender. I would be creeped out having females using male restrooms and if males could use female restrooms if they identify as female, then there could be perverts who could sexually harass or assault females in those restrooms.