I am sorry that you were unable to understand his answer. However, that is not my responsibility to help you with that.
He addressed your question. That is all that is necessary out of him. You are in the wrong.
Now back the fuck off.
I'm extremely saddened that I need to explain this so many fucking times to you, but if you're not willing to even attempt to justify yourself, then I will not only be ignoring your attempts to order me around, but I will also mock you as long as you continue to attempt to do so, k? Now if you actually expect something to come of this, either justify why I should accept it as a valid answer, or go fuck yourself. Personally, I'm good with either.
*sigh* I'm sorry that I have to explain the obvious to you.
First of all, he did directly answer your question. He went beyond the yes or no answer to expand on it and explain his answer.
Essentially, he was saying that it was more complicated than any yes or no or multiple choice question could answer. Multiple factors have to go into a situation, to make up for the lack of education that comes with people who fit the second person you listed.
In short, while one would rationally choose the person who, through the grace of fate and fortune, managed to already be successful enough to be able to qualify for the job, the government has to force an irrational decision.
The answer to your question was thus implicit.
He didn't dodge the question. You're dodging the answer. And your threats have placed you in the realm of harassment. You are bullying other forum members.
Back. Off.