Author Topic: Nuclear Test Un, Two, Three  (Read 8524 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline DiscoBerry

  • The Beast
  • *****
  • Posts: 1081
    • Has the Hadron Collider Destroyed the Earth Yet?
Nuclear Test Un, Two, Three
« on: February 12, 2013, 12:07:04 pm »
Biggest bomb North Korea has tested yet. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CkV7N32O_Vo

Linked because site won't let me embed for some reason. 
« Last Edit: February 12, 2013, 12:11:55 pm by DiscoBerry »

Offline Scotsgit

  • Is Reenacting Reality or Reality Reenacting?
  • The Beast
  • *****
  • Posts: 814
  • Gender: Male
Re: Nuclear Test Un, Two, Three
« Reply #1 on: February 12, 2013, 12:13:48 pm »
Bit from the BBC:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-21429544

Quote
North Korean military ambitions are a "serious threat" to the US, outgoing Pentagon chief Leon Panetta has said.

In a speech made after Pyongyang carried out its third nuclear test, Mr Panetta likened the North to Iran, describing them as "rogue states".

In New York, the UN Security Council "strongly condemned" the nuclear test.

The council said it would begin work on measures against North Korea, after UN chief Ban Ki-moon said the test was a "clear and grave violation".

Earlier, Pyongyang said "even stronger" action might follow, saying its test was a response to US "hostility".

Nuclear test monitors in Vienna say the underground explosion had double the force of the last test, in 2009, despite the use of a device said by the North to be smaller.

If a smaller device was indeed tested, analysts said this could take Pyongyang closer to building a warhead small enough to arm a missile.

UN sanctions on North Korea were expanded after the secretive communist state launched a rocket in December, in a move condemned by the UN as a banned test of missile technology.

'Stern' message
North Korea's latest nuclear test comes as senators in Washington prepare for the first votes on whether to confirm Chuck Hagel as successor to current Defence Secretary Leon Panetta.

In a farewell speech at the Pentagon, Mr Panetta said the US would continue to be tested by unpredictable regimes in years to come.

"We're going to have to deal with weapons of mass destruction and the proliferation. We're going to have to continue with rogue states like Iran and North Korea.

"We just saw what North Korea's done in these last few weeks - a missile test and now a nuclear test. They represent a serious threat to the United States of America. We've got to be prepared to deal with that."

US President Barack Obama, who is to make his State of the Union speech later, called the test a "highly provocative act" and called for "swift" and "credible" international action in response.

China, North Korea's main ally and a veto-wielding member of the Security Council, summoned North Korea's ambassador to Beijing to express its concern over the test.


Foreign Minister Yang Jiechi delivered a "stern representation"' to Ji Jae Ryong and expressed China's "strong dissatisfaction and firm opposition'' to the test, the Chinese foreign ministry said in a statement.

Earlier, it urged the North to honour its commitment to denuclearisation and "not take any actions which might worsen the situation".

The test was condemned by North Korea's immediate neighbours, South Korea and Japan, while Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov called for a revival of talks on the North's nuclear arms programme.

In a defiant message to the UN's disarmament forum, the North said it would never bow to resolutions on its nuclear programme and blamed the failure of diplomacy on the US.

"The US and their followers are sadly mistaken if they miscalculate the DPRK [North Korea] would respect the entirely unreasonable resolutions against it," the North's envoy, Jon Yong Ryong, told the Conference on Disarmament in Geneva.

'Miniaturised' device
North Korea confirmed the test after international monitors recorded seismic activity consistent with a powerful underground explosion at 11:57 (02:57 GMT) on Tuesday.

Activity had been observed at the Punggye-ri nuclear test site for several months.

State-run KCNA news agency said the test was "carried out at a high level in a safe and perfect manner using a miniaturised and lighter nuclear device with greater explosive force than previously".

North Korea said the nuclear test was a response to the "reckless hostility of the United States".


TL;DR:  North Korea has a nuke and, if recent years are anything to go by, a man who has absolute power in charge. 

So no worries then? :o
I am serious, and stop calling me Shirley!

Offline SpaceProg

  • What you read is what you get.
  • The Beast
  • *****
  • Posts: 5507
  • Nocturnal
Re: Nuclear Test Un, Two, Three
« Reply #2 on: February 12, 2013, 12:39:05 pm »
The destruction is mutually assured.  I hope Kim Jong Un knows that.

Offline mellenORL

  • Pedal Pushing Puppy Peon
  • The Beast
  • *****
  • Posts: 3876
  • Gender: Female
Re: Nuclear Test Un, Two, Three
« Reply #3 on: February 12, 2013, 12:41:22 pm »
The fact that China called NK's senior ambassador to come to the principal's office for a chat is helpful; "If we've told you once, we've told you a hundred times - No playing with firecrackers!"

Never a good idea to piss off the hand that feeds you, by threatening their largest trade customer, and by proximity, their second, third, fourth and fifth most important neighborhood customers, too. If NK ever goes through with an armed launch, Pyongyang will finally show up very, very brightly lit in a night time satelite image.
« Last Edit: February 12, 2013, 12:47:56 pm by mellenORL »
Quote from: Ultimate Chatbot That Totally Passes The Turing Test
I sympathize completely. However, to use against us. Let me ask you a troll. On the one who pulled it. But here's the question: where do I think it might as well have stepped out of all people would cling to a layman.

Offline Random Gal

  • Bisex Rex
  • The Beast
  • *****
  • Posts: 2686
  • Gender: Female
  • Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus
Re: Nuclear Test Un, Two, Three
« Reply #4 on: February 12, 2013, 12:42:31 pm »
Yeah. If he's dumb enough to actually use a nuke on another country, North Korea's getting curbstomped.

Offline SpaceProg

  • What you read is what you get.
  • The Beast
  • *****
  • Posts: 5507
  • Nocturnal
Re: Nuclear Test Un, Two, Three
« Reply #5 on: February 12, 2013, 12:45:06 pm »
What I hate is if Un goes through with actually attacking the US and curbstomping does occur, a lot of innocents will die simply because their ruler has his head up his ass.

Offline mellenORL

  • Pedal Pushing Puppy Peon
  • The Beast
  • *****
  • Posts: 3876
  • Gender: Female
Re: Nuclear Test Un, Two, Three
« Reply #6 on: February 12, 2013, 12:52:00 pm »
I strongly agree. NK's people have suffered enough. They are like the abused kids of a psycho neighbor's family, always wearing raggedy clothes, thin, scared-looking and brainwashed obedient to Daddy.

I just hope there is some secret defence hardware already in place to bat that roman candle outta the sky before it hurts someone.
Quote from: Ultimate Chatbot That Totally Passes The Turing Test
I sympathize completely. However, to use against us. Let me ask you a troll. On the one who pulled it. But here's the question: where do I think it might as well have stepped out of all people would cling to a layman.

Offline Askold

  • Definitely not hiding a dark secret.
  • Global Moderator
  • The Beast
  • *****
  • Posts: 8358
  • Gender: Male
Re: Nuclear Test Un, Two, Three
« Reply #7 on: February 12, 2013, 12:52:11 pm »
The destruction is mutually assured.  I hope Kim Jong Un knows that.

No it is not. North Korea can't destroy USA and her allies completely.

At best they might:

a) Fire off a nuke into South Korea (and conventional artillery and missiles as well) causing horrible damage to that country.

b) Perhaps fire a nuke into Japan.

c) If they improve their equipment fire one or two nukes into USA.

None of these would allow them to destroy their three main enemies, USA, Japan and South korea.

They can cause heavy casualties, mostly to civilians, and the nukes would certainly irradiate whatever they bomb but they do not have the firepower to destroy USA or Japan.

If the war is fought with conventional weapons only they could cause heavy casualties before collapsing but they would lose eventually because this time they would not get any help from Russia or China.

And if they fire the first nuke their country will be obliterated. The only objection china would have would be the fear of fallout spreading to their country. In fact China might even help curbstomp NK if it prevents others from using nukes.
No matter what happens, no matter what my last words may end up being, I want everyone to claim that they were:
"If you strike me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine."
Aww, you guys rock. :)  I feel the love... and the pitchforks and torches.  Tingly!

Offline Goonerboy

  • Neonate
  • *
  • Posts: 2
Re: Nuclear Test Un, Two, Three
« Reply #8 on: February 12, 2013, 01:09:12 pm »
Part of me hopes they go through with it, get curb stomped and annexed to the south, freeing the people who've been suffering all these decades.

Offline SpaceProg

  • What you read is what you get.
  • The Beast
  • *****
  • Posts: 5507
  • Nocturnal
Re: Nuclear Test Un, Two, Three
« Reply #9 on: February 12, 2013, 01:11:39 pm »
The destruction is mutually assured.  I hope Kim Jong Un knows that.

No it is not. North Korea can't destroy USA and her allies completely.

At best they might:

a) Fire off a nuke into South Korea (and conventional artillery and missiles as well) causing horrible damage to that country.

b) Perhaps fire a nuke into Japan.

c) If they improve their equipment fire one or two nukes into USA.

None of these would allow them to destroy their three main enemies, USA, Japan and South korea.

They can cause heavy casualties, mostly to civilians, and the nukes would certainly irradiate whatever they bomb but they do not have the firepower to destroy USA or Japan.

If the war is fought with conventional weapons only they could cause heavy casualties before collapsing but they would lose eventually because this time they would not get any help from Russia or China.

And if they fire the first nuke their country will be obliterated. The only objection china would have would be the fear of fallout spreading to their country. In fact China might even help curbstomp NK if it prevents others from using nukes.

Well... to be honest I said that mostly for dramatic effect.  You have good points.

Offline chitoryu12

  • The Beast
  • *****
  • Posts: 4009
  • Gender: Male
  • Tax-Payer Rhino
Re: Nuclear Test Un, Two, Three
« Reply #10 on: February 12, 2013, 08:18:21 pm »
I think South Korea will be their first target; I'm more than willing to bet that the US has missile defense systems in place, and it's unlikely that they'll even be able to make a launch that reaches us anyway. Not with the entire Pacific to try and cross first.

Also, they've got WAY more of a grudge against South Korea. I'm betting that if they do make an attack, it'll be toward their immediate enemies to try and annex them in preparation for whatever plans they may have. And that's basically just going to inspire everyone in NATO and probably everyone else to band together and blow them to smithereens. Assuming the South Koreans don't get to them first.
Still can't think of a signature a year later.

Offline RavynousHunter

  • Master Thief
  • The Beast
  • *****
  • Posts: 8108
  • Gender: Male
  • A man of no consequence.
    • My Twitter
Re: Nuclear Test Un, Two, Three
« Reply #11 on: February 12, 2013, 08:28:13 pm »
Yeaaaaaah...if they bomb South Korea, the shit's gonna hit the fan, especially if its a nuke.  Also, its pretty bad when China, a country that's infamous for its very strong-handed government law enforcement, to put it lightly, and likely one of the only credible threats to the USA, is calling you out for being bug-fuck insane.

Kim Jong Un, please, get a therapist.  For the sake of your fuckin people, because making a martyr of an entire country would likely lead to your country being set on fire.  Literally and metaphorically.
Quote from: Bra'tac
Life for the sake of life means nothing.

Offline chitoryu12

  • The Beast
  • *****
  • Posts: 4009
  • Gender: Male
  • Tax-Payer Rhino
Re: Nuclear Test Un, Two, Three
« Reply #12 on: February 12, 2013, 08:39:29 pm »
Yeaaaaaah...if they bomb South Korea, the shit's gonna hit the fan, especially if its a nuke.  Also, its pretty bad when China, a country that's infamous for its very strong-handed government law enforcement, to put it lightly, and likely one of the only credible threats to the USA, is calling you out for being bug-fuck insane.

Kim Jong Un, please, get a therapist.  For the sake of your fuckin people, because making a martyr of an entire country would likely lead to your country being set on fire.  Literally and metaphorically.

Well, China's also not stupid. China and the US are both highly reliant on one another for economic stability, and the people running China aren't outright evil. They support North Korea when it suits them, but they ALSO know that they're like a petulant child. Well, they're starting to realize that the petulant child hasn't changed as it's grown up and is ready to do something really fucking stupid.
Still can't think of a signature a year later.

Offline Jack Mann

  • Gold Bugger Jihad Pony
  • God
  • *****
  • Posts: 603
Re: Nuclear Test Un, Two, Three
« Reply #13 on: February 12, 2013, 10:20:04 pm »
North Korea has been useful to China.  They were like a leashed dog.  "Gosh, it's a pity about all those trade sanctions you want to put on us.  On a completely unrelated note, our buddy North Korea wants to build some nukes.  We could probably get them to stop, but..."  It's worked for them in the past.  Unfortunately, North Korea has just shown that they won't listen to China anymore.

This presents a problem for China.  They don't want to let the US in, because then they'd have even more US influence in the region.  They don't want North Korea to actually go to war, because that would ruffle all sorts of diplomatic feathers on all sides, and disrupt trade.  And they don't want to invade North Korea for themselves, because it's going to be goddamned expensive to fix up that mess.

It'll be interesting to see what China ultimately does.  They pretty much hold the fate of North Korea in their hands now.
اللغة العربية صعبة ، ولكنها جميلة جدا

Offline chitoryu12

  • The Beast
  • *****
  • Posts: 4009
  • Gender: Male
  • Tax-Payer Rhino
Re: Nuclear Test Un, Two, Three
« Reply #14 on: February 12, 2013, 10:27:30 pm »
North Korea has been useful to China.  They were like a leashed dog.  "Gosh, it's a pity about all those trade sanctions you want to put on us.  On a completely unrelated note, our buddy North Korea wants to build some nukes.  We could probably get them to stop, but..."  It's worked for them in the past.  Unfortunately, North Korea has just shown that they won't listen to China anymore.

This presents a problem for China.  They don't want to let the US in, because then they'd have even more US influence in the region.  They don't want North Korea to actually go to war, because that would ruffle all sorts of diplomatic feathers on all sides, and disrupt trade.  And they don't want to invade North Korea for themselves, because it's going to be goddamned expensive to fix up that mess.

It'll be interesting to see what China ultimately does.  They pretty much hold the fate of North Korea in their hands now.

I think in the event of outright war between NATO (read: everyone else) and North Korea, China would either stay neutral (or give minimal secret assistance to NK) or outright work with everyone else. It would be extremely bad for their continued existence to support North Korea if they attacked anyone, especially the United States, and they know that. North Korea is one of those countries that literally everyone, even minor South American states, really wouldn't mind seeing go away. If China supports the country that's basically Blofeld made into a country, it would be tantamount to getting the entire world against them. And they can't afford that.

Neither can the rest of the planet, really; everyone is co-dependent in their relationships with China. But if a nuke gets launched or South Korea gets invaded, it's going to be a no-holds-barred beatdown and China WILL get caught in the crossfire if they try to support the bad guys.
Still can't think of a signature a year later.