No, man of the odd post cadence, I WASN'T wrong. Because being wrong would imply that I had taken a side one way or the other, or that I was counterfactual.
If you look in every single post that I've made in this thread, I have never said that the hospital was definitely not engaging in homophobic bigotry. Nor have I definitely said that they WERE. Every time I've posted here, it's been to urge cautious in making assumptions and to wait for more information before jumping to a conclusion about bigotry.
As wonderful as Queen's post was, it didn't answer anything I was asking. It made a lot of accusations, but didn't reveal anything new about how the hospital acted or proved that it was anything more than a bad situation brought about by miscommunication and lack of information.
The post about the former employee saying something bigoted also doesn't prove anything, as much as people want to crow about it, because it was made by a FORMER EMPLOYEE. They're taking the casual insults of a woman who no longer works at that hospital as evidence that the hospital is bigoted against homosexuals. Taking it as evidence of bigotry is the exact wrong way to go about it, and makes me wonder just how many of the premature accusations are based on emotional responses.
Again, I'm not going toward either side right now. It's not "wrong" to wait for more information before making a judgement, and attacking me for not immediately making homophobia accusations and acting like I'm implicitly supporting homophobic judgments is plainly ridiculous.