Judge Blames 13 Year Old Victim

[kefkaownsall]

STFU rape blaming ass troll

[ironbite]

Even if she was 16, that's still underage

No it's not.  Besides, by 13 a child has already experienced at least 5 years of atheistic "sex education" lessons in schools.  This amounts to little more than paedophile grooming sessions. 

In broader terms, this is the inevitable result of divorcing your society and legal system from Godly justice and morality.

You I won't miss.

Ironbite-this guy...I won't miss either...*prepares a colony drop*

[Old Viking]

Would her returning to the house over a two-week period be a consideration?  Granted the guy is a predatory scumbag, but "Don't do it, Don't do it again, Don't do it again, Don't do it again ..." seems like a shaky defense.

[Cerim Treascair]

Aw! AE's back! glee!

[Ghoti]

Even if she was 16, that's still underage

No it's not.  Besides, by 13 a child has already experienced at least 5 years of atheistic "sex education" lessons in schools.  This amounts to little more than paedophile grooming sessions. 

In broader terms, this is the inevitable result of divorcing your society and legal system from Godly justice and morality.

1. You're right, 16 legally the age of consent in the UK. However, a 41-year-old fucking a 16-year-old is still gross. Even grosser is the "stash of images and videos depicting child abuse and bestiality" the police found in the guy's house.
2. So you're saying sex ed starts in second grade? lol wut
3. From my experience, "sex education" in schools amounts to having some fuckwit youth pastor come into the classroom, tape kids' arms together, and desperately try to make some kind of point about "saving yourself for your husband/wife". Completely useless, but not pedophile grooming sessions.
3.5. Is no one concerned about WHY a thirteen-year-old is "sexually experienced"? Was she molested? WTF is going on?
4. Actually, the inevitable result of divorcing your society and legal system from "G-dly justice and morality" is that believers follow their religion's rules without making those rules secular law. You know, because the bible is a terrible source of morality and things like "empathy", "fairness", and "common sense" work much better.

In summary, you are insulting, wrong, and insultingly wrong. Please die in a fire, preferably a fire from the colony drop Ironbite is preparing.

[Sigmaleph]

No it's not.  Besides, by 13 a child has already experienced at least 5 years of atheistic "sex education" lessons in schools.  This amounts to little more than paedophile grooming sessions.

No, see, you're confusing atheists with the Catholic Church again. Quit odd, really.

[MadCatTLX]

Even if she was 16, that's still underage

No it's not.  Besides, by 13 a child has already experienced at least 5 years of atheistic "sex education" lessons in schools.  This amounts to little more than paedophile grooming sessions. 

In broader terms, this is the inevitable result of divorcing your society and legal system from Godly justice and morality.

1. You're right, 16 legally the age of consent in the UK. However, a 41-year-old fucking a 16-year-old is still gross. Even grosser is the "stash of images and videos depicting child abuse and bestiality" the police found in the guy's house.
2. So you're saying sex ed starts in second grade? lol wut
3. From my experience, "sex education" in schools amounts to having some fuckwit youth pastor come into the classroom, tape kids' arms together, and desperately try to make some kind of point about "saving yourself for your husband/wife". Completely useless, but not pedophile grooming sessions.
3.5. Is no one concerned about WHY a thirteen-year-old is "sexually experienced"? Was she molested? WTF is going on?
4. Actually, the inevitable result of divorcing your society and legal system from "G-dly justice and morality" is that believers follow their religion's rules without making those rules secular law. You know, because the bible is a terrible source of morality and things like "empathy", "fairness", and "common sense" work much better.

In summary, you are insulting, wrong, and insultingly wrong. Please die in a fire, preferably a fire from the colony drop Ironbite is preparing.

Since you're new I guess I should brief you on AE. I suspect he's either a troll or...  well he argued for geocentrisism, stating that the accepted model of heliocentrisism is a lie and conspiracy perpetuated by evil scientists.

[Ghoti]

Even if she was 16, that's still underage

No it's not.  Besides, by 13 a child has already experienced at least 5 years of atheistic "sex education" lessons in schools.  This amounts to little more than paedophile grooming sessions. 

In broader terms, this is the inevitable result of divorcing your society and legal system from Godly justice and morality.

1. You're right, 16 legally the age of consent in the UK. However, a 41-year-old fucking a 16-year-old is still gross. Even grosser is the "stash of images and videos depicting child abuse and bestiality" the police found in the guy's house.
2. So you're saying sex ed starts in second grade? lol wut
3. From my experience, "sex education" in schools amounts to having some fuckwit youth pastor come into the classroom, tape kids' arms together, and desperately try to make some kind of point about "saving yourself for your husband/wife". Completely useless, but not pedophile grooming sessions.
3.5. Is no one concerned about WHY a thirteen-year-old is "sexually experienced"? Was she molested? WTF is going on?
4. Actually, the inevitable result of divorcing your society and legal system from "G-dly justice and morality" is that believers follow their religion's rules without making those rules secular law. You know, because the bible is a terrible source of morality and things like "empathy", "fairness", and "common sense" work much better.

In summary, you are insulting, wrong, and insultingly wrong. Please die in a fire, preferably a fire from the colony drop Ironbite is preparing.

Since you're new I guess I should brief you on AE. I suspect he's either a troll or...  well he argued for geocentrisism, stating that the accepted model of heliocentrisism is a lie and conspiracy perpetuated by evil scientists.

OH, sorry, didn't mean to feed the troll. I was in a bad mood when I posted that and I needed something to rage at. Might at well be a victim-blaming fundie douchebag.

[MadCatTLX]

Don't worry, we feed all the time and watch him do tricks. It's often amusing.

[kefkaownsall]

Based on his videos i dont think he's a troll

[wrightway]

I...I...dafuq did I just read?

[MadCatTLX]

Based on his videos i dont think he's a troll

Ah, I forgot about those. Well then, like I said, he argued for geocentrisism.

[tempus]

Even if she was 16, that's still underage

No it's not.  Besides, by 13 a child has already experienced at least 5 years of atheistic "sex education" lessons in schools.  This amounts to little more than paedophile grooming sessions. 

In broader terms, this is the inevitable result of divorcing your society and legal system from Godly justice and morality.

Threadshitting troll says what?

[RavynousHunter]

Even if she was 16, that's still underage

No it's not.  Besides, by 13 a child has already experienced at least 5 years of atheistic "sex education" lessons in schools.  This amounts to little more than paedophile grooming sessions. 

In broader terms, this is the inevitable result of divorcing your society and legal system from Godly justice and morality.

Okay, ever wear mixed fabrics, eaten shellfish or pork, worked on the Sabbath, said "GOD DAMN IT!", or harbored a single sexual thought about someone to whom you weren't married?  If you answered "yes" to any of those, then I got some nice, heavy stones for you.  You've no room to bitch, Yahweh said that we're to stone blasphemers and false prophets like you until you're nothing more than bloody stains in the sand.

[Itachirumon]

Even if she was 16, that's still underage

No it's not.  Besides, by 13 a child has already experienced at least 5 years of atheistic "sex education" lessons in schools.  This amounts to little more than paedophile grooming sessions. 

In broader terms, this is the inevitable result of divorcing your society and legal system from Godly justice and morality.

Okay, ever wear mixed fabrics, eaten shellfish or pork, worked on the Sabbath, said "GOD DAMN IT!", or harbored a single sexual thought about someone to whom you weren't married?  If you answered "yes" to any of those, then I got some nice, heavy stones for you.  You've no room to bitch, Yahweh said that we're to stone blasphemers and false prophets like you until you're nothing more than bloody stains in the sand.

I don't have stones, but I've got some nice, black, obsidian volcanic rock....We can sharpen it, cut his stones off, and stone him with his stones. So he'll be stoned by his stones, it'll be stoneception.