So you continue to hijack the thread, then?? Why don't you just make a thread entitled "Why I'm a Hillary Fangirl, and you should be one too" and get it over with. Also what she did was lame and pandering, I'm quite tired of the whole can't call her out on her bs, but if it was GOP candidate it would be a whole different story. It was lame, and still would be lame no matter who said it. She is more less trying too hard, and that's why it comes off as such.
This is a stupid thread and personally I am happy to have it hijacked with a political discussion. So I'm turning this bus around. Or at least I would if they would give me back my drivers licence and remove the alcohol lock.
One thing I've noticed is that no matter how detailed Queen's responses are Nicky you just seem to scream back "why don't you go live in Hillary's vagina". To descend into the counter response it would be 'you only feel the bern because you have herpes and need to pee'. Which would be silly.
I might be missing some of the political context over here but here a few things I've noticed:
1. People keep saying that Hillary is immune from criticism because she has a vagina. How has her magical vagina protected her from criticism? When has Queen said that Hillary's magical vagina should prevent anyone saying anything bad about her?
2. Sanders email scandal really did seem like a big deal to me. They accessed another candidates information and got caught. They didn't get caught running innocent searches either. They were using the information so that they could best undermine Hillary's campaign and promote their own. Now because of the nature of this they got a very unfair headstart. How do you punish them? You lock them out of the system. It seems to me both Hillary and Bernie played this well. Sanders didn't scream conspiracy. He got rid of the people who did it and apologised, Hillary accepted and moved on. As for the DNC, I don't see what else they could do. Now if Hillary gets caught doing the same thing and then doesn't get punished that will be the time to cry conspiracy.
3. Saying that the superdelegates have all been instructed to support Hillary. By whom? Where is the evidence of this?
Finally the real problem with the US system is that the general election is not between Hillary and Sanders. I genuinely think Hillary will be a good president who will keep the US moving forward. She is too Hawkish for my tastes but the US has a very delicate position in Foreign Affairs and I understand that some military action will be more or less inevitable. Sanders will be very interesting on the international stage. I love some of his policies, particularly funding college tuition. I also think that reducing income inequality will be good for the US economy.
I don't think that either Hillary or Sanders will be the second coming of Lincoln, FDR, Kennedy or Jesus but both will be capable of steering the US. On the otherside of politics I would not trust most of the republican candidates from plunging the international economy into a global depression or starting WWIII