So, is there any other incident of CNN doing something horribly shady? Or just them tracking down a racist troll who harassed people online and then cried like a baby when realizing that this might backfire on them? And since even the troll didn't get "doxxed" (Which it wouldn't have been anyway if they'd shown his face on the paper because that's what news organizations have done for centuries now.)
Now... Since Lana didn't bother to mention this let me quote something from THEIR OWN source that they provided at the start of this thread:
According to the metadata of the Word document containing the email that was provided to Fox, it appears that Glenn last edited it.
So, we have proof that the father edited the email instead of simply copying it to a word file and presenting it to FOX.
Odd that Lana focused on "begging the question" if CNN evidence was fake and did not mention that the other side had been proven to have faked their evidence. Either they didn't read their own source or they consider doctored evidence to be as valid as real evidence. There is only one option for me now.
First, how do we know CNN released the real emails?
Lana was banned from the zoo last year for trying have sex with the tapirs.
Sure I have no evidence for that, but how do we know you weren't? Since we don't obviously we should assume you are a Tapir fucker.
Yes, that is exactly what happened and I enjoyed it.
There we have it, a confession. Now, Lana might disagree but how do we know that they will release the real quote?