Rubbish > Preaching and Worship
More proof that Catholicism is true
dpareja:
--- Quote from: Jacob Harrison on November 09, 2018, 05:09:04 pm ---
--- Quote from: dpareja on November 09, 2018, 04:47:11 pm ---
--- Quote from: Jacob Harrison on November 09, 2018, 03:00:29 pm ---
--- Quote from: Tolpuddle Martyr on November 09, 2018, 02:56:35 pm ---They're creepy men-not time lords, it's not the same withered old sexist just because it's the same stupid hat!
--- End quote ---
But how do you explain that none of them contradicted each other over two thousand years when defining doctrines concerning faith or morals?
--- End quote ---
Because they have all that stuff documented and have tons of staff to check to make sure that none of what they're about to speak (supposedly) infallibly on contradicts what any other Child Abuser in Chief said?
--- End quote ---
Papal Infallibility was not dogmatically defined until the First Vatican Council in 1870 so how do you explain how Popes from before then did not contradict other Popes who defined doctrine concerning faith or morals.
--- End quote ---
See explanation above.
Jacob Harrison:
--- Quote from: dpareja on November 09, 2018, 05:39:42 pm ---
--- Quote from: Jacob Harrison on November 09, 2018, 05:09:04 pm ---
--- Quote from: dpareja on November 09, 2018, 04:47:11 pm ---
--- Quote from: Jacob Harrison on November 09, 2018, 03:00:29 pm ---
--- Quote from: Tolpuddle Martyr on November 09, 2018, 02:56:35 pm ---They're creepy men-not time lords, it's not the same withered old sexist just because it's the same stupid hat!
--- End quote ---
But how do you explain that none of them contradicted each other over two thousand years when defining doctrines concerning faith or morals?
--- End quote ---
Because they have all that stuff documented and have tons of staff to check to make sure that none of what they're about to speak (supposedly) infallibly on contradicts what any other Child Abuser in Chief said?
--- End quote ---
Papal Infallibility was not dogmatically defined until the First Vatican Council in 1870 so how do you explain how Popes from before then did not contradict other Popes who defined doctrine concerning faith or morals.
--- End quote ---
See explanation above.
--- End quote ---
Your explanation does not explain the cases before the First Vatican Council because before Papal Infallibility was dogmatically defined, there wouldn't be a need to check if their defining of doctrine concerning faith or morals contradicted other popes definitions of doctrine concerning faith or morals.
dpareja:
--- Quote from: Jacob Harrison on November 09, 2018, 05:46:26 pm ---
--- Quote from: dpareja on November 09, 2018, 05:39:42 pm ---
--- Quote from: Jacob Harrison on November 09, 2018, 05:09:04 pm ---
--- Quote from: dpareja on November 09, 2018, 04:47:11 pm ---
--- Quote from: Jacob Harrison on November 09, 2018, 03:00:29 pm ---
--- Quote from: Tolpuddle Martyr on November 09, 2018, 02:56:35 pm ---They're creepy men-not time lords, it's not the same withered old sexist just because it's the same stupid hat!
--- End quote ---
But how do you explain that none of them contradicted each other over two thousand years when defining doctrines concerning faith or morals?
--- End quote ---
Because they have all that stuff documented and have tons of staff to check to make sure that none of what they're about to speak (supposedly) infallibly on contradicts what any other Child Abuser in Chief said?
--- End quote ---
Papal Infallibility was not dogmatically defined until the First Vatican Council in 1870 so how do you explain how Popes from before then did not contradict other Popes who defined doctrine concerning faith or morals.
--- End quote ---
See explanation above.
--- End quote ---
Your explanation does not explain the cases before the First Vatican Council because before Papal Infallibility was dogmatically defined, there wouldn't be a need to check if their defining of doctrine concerning faith or morals contradicted other popes definitions of doctrine concerning faith or morals.
--- End quote ---
It would avoid embarrassment if someone should point out that Child Abuser in Chief X contradicted Child Abuser in Chief Y.
Jacob Harrison:
--- Quote from: dpareja on November 09, 2018, 05:56:06 pm ---
--- Quote from: Jacob Harrison on November 09, 2018, 05:46:26 pm ---
--- Quote from: dpareja on November 09, 2018, 05:39:42 pm ---
--- Quote from: Jacob Harrison on November 09, 2018, 05:09:04 pm ---
--- Quote from: dpareja on November 09, 2018, 04:47:11 pm ---
--- Quote from: Jacob Harrison on November 09, 2018, 03:00:29 pm ---
--- Quote from: Tolpuddle Martyr on November 09, 2018, 02:56:35 pm ---They're creepy men-not time lords, it's not the same withered old sexist just because it's the same stupid hat!
--- End quote ---
But how do you explain that none of them contradicted each other over two thousand years when defining doctrines concerning faith or morals?
--- End quote ---
Because they have all that stuff documented and have tons of staff to check to make sure that none of what they're about to speak (supposedly) infallibly on contradicts what any other Child Abuser in Chief said?
--- End quote ---
Papal Infallibility was not dogmatically defined until the First Vatican Council in 1870 so how do you explain how Popes from before then did not contradict other Popes who defined doctrine concerning faith or morals.
--- End quote ---
See explanation above.
--- End quote ---
Your explanation does not explain the cases before the First Vatican Council because before Papal Infallibility was dogmatically defined, there wouldn't be a need to check if their defining of doctrine concerning faith or morals contradicted other popes definitions of doctrine concerning faith or morals.
--- End quote ---
It would avoid embarrassment if someone should point out that Child Abuser in Chief X contradicted Child Abuser in Chief Y.
--- End quote ---
Given that it is 2000 years and the tons of historical record's even the staff would be prone to making mistakes and could forget about a particular historical record that showed that the Pope is contradicting another Pope. And also, most Popes throughout the history of the church were not child abusers. The child abuse began in the 20th century. The Catholic Church was much more moral and holy during the Age of Christendom.
dpareja:
Yes, because Roderic de Borja was so moral and upstanding with all his mistresses.
The Catholic Church is one of the oldest organized crime syndicates in the world.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version