Our open source community prioritizes marginalized people’s safety over privileged people’s comfort.
That alone sends off alarm bells. It's
very easy to use that sentence as an excuse to preserve double standards, provided they "punch up".
We will not act on complaints regarding: ‘Reverse’ -isms, including ‘reverse racism,’ ‘reverse sexism,’ and ‘cisphobia’
In other words, white male cishets are acceptable targets.
"We will not act on complaints regarding: Refusal to explain or debate social justice concepts"
So radflakes will be able to carpet bomb projects at will, and can simply refuse to explain any of their actions.
"We will not act on complaints regarding: Communicating in a ‘tone’ you don’t find congenial"
We all know one of the most visible attributes of social justice fanatics is their rudeness. This rule gives a lot of freedom to troublemakers.
"we explicitly honor diversity in... technical ability"
So when newcomers will no knowledge or understanding of a project start making trouble on mailing lists of bug reports, they will be protected against those who explain why they are acting like idiots.
"If someone has been harmed or offended, it is our responsibility to listen carefully and respectfully, and do our best to right the wrong."
As Stephen Fry said, offense is taken, not given. No-one has any control over which individuals will chose to claim offense over their words. This rule lets troublemakers escalate the most trivial issues until an administrator is forced to give in to them.
Harassment includes: Deliberate “outing” of any aspect of a person’s identity without their consent except as necessary to protect others from intentional abuse.
Doxxing is forbidden unless it's in the good name of preventing harassment of marginalized people. Fine in theory, but this seems like it could be easily abused. Anybody could doxx somebody and claim it's for the greater good.
And that's not even mentioning the blatant inconsistencies...