Rubbish > Preaching and Worship
More proof that Catholicism is true
Jacob Harrison:
The doctrine of Papal Infallibility is misunderstood by non Catholics. They misinterpret it do mean that the Pope is a perfect being. That is not true. Papal infallibility is that the Pope "when, in the exercise of his office as shepherd and teacher of all Christians, in virtue of his supreme apostolic authority, he defines a doctrine concerning faith or morals to be held by the whole Church." The last time Papal Infallibility was used was in 1950 when Pope Pius XII defined the Assumption of Mary as an article of faith.
To test whether Papal Infallibility is true, you have to analyze if a Pope ever defined a doctrine concerning faith or morals that contradicts another Pope's defined doctrine concerning faith or morals. That would disprove Papal Infallibility. However, that has never happened throughout the 2000 year history of the Roman Catholic Church. It is miraculous considering all the Popes throughout history and all the doctrines concerning faith or morals that have been defined. It proves Papal Infallibility.
Tolpuddle Martyr:
They're creepy men-not time lords, it's not the same withered old sexist just because it's the same stupid hat!
Jacob Harrison:
--- Quote from: Tolpuddle Martyr on November 09, 2018, 02:56:35 pm ---They're creepy men-not time lords, it's not the same withered old sexist just because it's the same stupid hat!
--- End quote ---
But how do you explain that none of them contradicted each other over two thousand years when defining doctrines concerning faith or morals?
dpareja:
--- Quote from: Jacob Harrison on November 09, 2018, 03:00:29 pm ---
--- Quote from: Tolpuddle Martyr on November 09, 2018, 02:56:35 pm ---They're creepy men-not time lords, it's not the same withered old sexist just because it's the same stupid hat!
--- End quote ---
But how do you explain that none of them contradicted each other over two thousand years when defining doctrines concerning faith or morals?
--- End quote ---
Because they have all that stuff documented and have tons of staff to check to make sure that none of what they're about to speak (supposedly) infallibly on contradicts what any other Child Abuser in Chief said?
Jacob Harrison:
--- Quote from: dpareja on November 09, 2018, 04:47:11 pm ---
--- Quote from: Jacob Harrison on November 09, 2018, 03:00:29 pm ---
--- Quote from: Tolpuddle Martyr on November 09, 2018, 02:56:35 pm ---They're creepy men-not time lords, it's not the same withered old sexist just because it's the same stupid hat!
--- End quote ---
But how do you explain that none of them contradicted each other over two thousand years when defining doctrines concerning faith or morals?
--- End quote ---
Because they have all that stuff documented and have tons of staff to check to make sure that none of what they're about to speak (supposedly) infallibly on contradicts what any other Child Abuser in Chief said?
--- End quote ---
Papal Infallibility was not dogmatically defined until the First Vatican Council in 1870 so how do you explain how Popes from before then did not contradict other Popes who defined doctrine concerning faith or morals.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
Go to full version