For chrissake, do I really need to spell it out for you?
It's the ethics of the people that determine that stealing is wrong. And the ethics of the people are necessary because we humans need society to function.
If people decide that it is okay to steal, then it harms everyone in the long run. That is why it is ethically wrong.
Ethics and morality aren't objective principles handed down and accepted, they are created out of the economic and political realities under which we live. The morals of people living 200 years ago were vastly different to what 'morals' we have now. Hell, even now people claim homosexuality is immoral or that knowingly bringing up a child in a same-sex couple household is unethical.
This piece is quite good in explaining 'morality' (though I have my disagreements), some of the bits in this piece are also useful.It is legally wrong because society needs a functioning set of standards. The line drawn in the sand that says "this is punishable, this is not." This doesn't mean all laws are just, but that for every law broken, there must be a repercussion.
Laws exist to maintain the current social relations and solve 'problems' in society. Why is it that petty theft is condemned but other types of theft are ignored or sanctioned? Would we need laws against theft if people didn't steal (by eliminating the factors that drive people to theft)?
This is what it means to be civilly disobedient. To intentionally break the law, knowing that you will deal with the consequences, and dealing with them gracefully. Otherwise, it is just cowardice and base justification for petty crime.
This makes little sense. It is being civilly disobedient when you accept the punishment for your crime?
Just to toss it out there, even accounting for lost property or stolen goods, you do know that those numbers are counted against the people who actually work for the business right? Used to deny people raises or bonuses that would make their lives more reasonable to deal with? They can account for it all they want, and they can also say that had those accounts not been dented so hard someone might have actually gotten that money.
You're stealing from someone who's working to make a living in the end. Probably a number of them. Which puts it quite squarely in the 'Not Ethical' category, without bothering to reference legality. Unless I can walk off with your shit that is.
Do you have evidence that shoplifting is counted against employees? I could see it happening if an employee had seen or actively helped someone steal, otherwise it is simply a bullshit excuse for employers to deny pay rises. And do you have any evidence that the money saved from shoplifting would be passed on in increased wages?
Items in a store do not belong to the workers there, they belong to whoever owns the store. Stealing does not take money from the workers but the owner. Also, did you not read my caveat that;
A) I don't support shoplifting, simply that I don't care
and
B) it depends who takes what from whom/where
So Largeham, what's your beef with business?
Technically my beef is with capitalism, companies are simply a way for individuals to control their property (means of production, not your toothbrush, house, car, etc). My beef with capitalism is the exploitation of workers, the periodic crises(es?) it falls into, the inevitable wars and the racism and sexism that support the system.