Worst of Social Justice

[RavynousHunter]

Because that takes thought and a modicum of curiosity and investigative skills.  Such things are beyond their tiny minds.

[Patches]

Huh.  One of the blogs I follow, which has absolutely nothing to do with social justice, got a random flame from an ANTI-social justice warrior for a post talking about how writers are often pressured to include fanservice that they may not particularly want or find appropriate for their story, and had posted a scan from an "Inuyasha" artbook where the author of the series commented that she absolutely put her foot down and demanded the anime adaptation not include any panty-shots because she didn't want them.  The anti-SJW then flamed her for the "misogynistic" idea that panties are necessarily sexual (when her article was simply about a creator standing up against market pressure to include something in her work that she didn't personally want to be there).

We are through the looking glass.  We have SJWs fighting oppression that doesn't exist, and anti-SJWs fighting against SJWs that don't exist.

[RavynousHunter]

Whelp, time to sit back and watch them kill one another when their individual psychoses break.  Who's got the peanut butter M&Ms?

[Thejebusfire]

"purr/purrs/purrself"

[chitoryu12]

It's telling that she also accepts regular feminine pronouns. It's like she's admitting that she can't get away with it.

[Askold]

It's telling that she also accepts regular feminine pronouns. It's like she's admitting that she can't get away with it.

Or that even if she would prefer the pronouns that she thought of herself she accepts regular ones as well and is not likely to freak out and start ranting if people use the wrong pronoun.

We already have several pronouns in english language and I try not to use the wrong one to address someone. I can even use Zie and such if that is what they want to be used (or just avoid pronouns completely so that I won't use the wrong one accidentally) but some of those special snowflake pronouns are annoying.

...Also, that post might have been written jokingly. Or maybe she thought that when she offers things like "purr/purrself" people will at least use she rather than he.

[Ghoti]

Is no one going to talk about how she's apparently "kitty-gender" and "null-gender"? I suppose non-gender (neither male nor female) is a real thing, but calling it that and using "void/voidself" is just dumb.

[The Right Honourable Mlle Antéchrist]

Uh

[Dakota Bob]

Well, if you think all that "bunself" shit is perfectly legit then no, you don't deserve to be taken seriously.

[I am lizard]

Uh

Fat would make a human less hydrodynamic.

[Ultimate Paragon]

Humans do not have blubber.

[Witchyjoshy]

Though in the event of a worldwide flood, fat people are more likely to float and are more resistant to cold temperatures so... yay?

[niam2023]

Yet their large amounts of viable meat would make them susceptible to the new predators, the Flying Carnivorous Monkeys of the American Islands, controlled by an insane Sarah Palin who calls herself the Wicked Bitch of the West!

[TheUnknown]

Though in the event of a worldwide flood, fat people are more likely to float and are more resistant to cold temperatures so... yay?

This sounds like they're working off an actual hypothesis of human evolution; it says that primitive humans may have frequently explored bodies of water since we're allegedly the only ape whose offspring will instinctively know how to swim if continually exposed to water from birth (don't know if that's actually true), and since newborns will automatically hold their breath when submerged.  It says nothing about blubber, however.

Ironically, they just gave bullies more reason to call overweight people "land/beached whales".

[lord gibbon]

Yeah, the actual aquatic ape hypothesis is worth a look, but it DOSEN'T say anything about fat, more about stuff like hairlessness.