Let's talk about this somewhere else. It's sending the thread wildly off the rails.
Here's a kindergarten teacher discriminating against male students because she thinks it'll help gender equality:
http://seattle.cbslocal.com/2015/11/19/kindergarten-teacher-bans-legos-for-boys-citing-gender-equity/
When you have an axe to grind with 5 year old children, it means you shouldn't be allowed near them.
Fuck you are far more dishonest and insincere than I thought. It's actually pretty special.
I dunno, that really is the wrong way to go about it. You can encourage girls to do a thing without banning the boys.
I believe Davedan was referencing the part that I bolded. There is a thread in F&B that Paragon refuses to acknowledge about this very debate tactic of his.
And his new thread is comical. He concedes half the things we were debating so that he could continue to argue that international men's day is needed to protect men from false rape allegations. Yes, that is the only part left of what he is arguing, and it needed a whole new thread.
I was talking about that. Particularly given the now completely clear and insincere feigned outrage of earlier in the thread. Further he has elided responding to the questions about how he could have used a particular example as saying that feminists were seeking lesser punishments for women for being women, when it clearly, very clearly didn't.
If it gets hard, feign outrage about something not expressly directed at me, ignore the hard question, wait move back to where I want to go. He's doing it in his own pet thread in F&B too.
