Woman Calls 911 and Gets Raped By Responder

[gomer21xx]

SO. MUCH. RAEG!!

1. Rape is horrible. Extremely so.

2. A 911 responder betraying the trust of the people who ask him/her for help is equally horrible.

3. People insisting that non-virgins can't be raped, or that it doesn't matter somehow that a non-virgin was raped BECAUSE he/she was already a non-vrigin, are disgusting.

I shall now imagine the rapist and the victim-blamers being thrown into a large pit of hungry bears.

Bears on crack and steroids, even?  That'd make their introductions into the endless cycles of shit all the nastier.

[Smurfette Principle]

Bears on PCP. PCP is a violent hallucinogen, and while under its effects one doesn't really feel pain.

[MadCatTLX]

I hope the fucker that did this gets raped himself- with a razor blade and sand paper covered dildo attached to a power drill!

[Cataclysm]

^I like that. There's no animal cruelty.

Well, except that guy. But he doesn't count.

[Iczerfour]

WTF!

Excuse me while i go to my angry Dimension...     

[nickiknack]

The racist & victim blaming coments sound like trolls, the one that said the most racist one, their name is KnuckleDragger...either they're a troll or a self aware douchebag with a name like that.

[Lithp]

Not necessarily. I've seen some people name themselves things for bizarre, circuitous reasons.

[Captain Jack Harkness]

Not necessarily. I've seen some people name themselves things for bizarre, circuitous reasons.

Yeah, don't some of the "Niggermania" folk do this?

[erictheblue]

How in the flying fuck is forcefully sodomizing someone not rape? What the hell was the author thinking when they wrote this sentence?

Just a few guesses...

1) Most people think of "rape" as "penis/vagina" contact. (Or at least, contact of some part of the body, like a finger, with the vagina.) To differentiate the first action from the penis-vagina rape, the author used two different terms. Also, phrasing it that way allows the author to say that the officer did more than vaginally rape the victim. (If the author just said "the officer raped her," the reader is not aware of the other actions he took.) 

2) Use of euphemisms. The author didn't want to say "the officer forced her to perform oral sex on him" or the like. It's wordy and (since I can't think of another way to phrase it) makes people picture what he did. So the author writes that the officer sodomized her, which gets the point across without sounding "crude."

[e13]

*Rapist implies artistic skill. You don't have murderists.

...What? Maybe it's just me, but I don't exactly associate art with rapists.

According to wikipedia's dictionary, the ist suffix has two applicable meanings.

3) A member of a profession or one interested in something.
botanist, psychiatrist, one who studies psychiatry
4) A person who uses something.
violinist, one who plays a violin

The second meaning is less inappropriate, but (I'd argue) still wrong. People do not (usually) use rape- rape is the end, not the means. The first meaning is even worse. Rape is not a profession, something that you study and perfect. It's not like art or physics. Rape should have the simpler -er suffix attached to it, like with murder.

1) person or thing that (does the action indicated by verb); used to form an agent noun.
reader, cooker, computer, runner-up, do-gooder

Definitions are wonderful things. However, as a language evolves, so too do the definitions. The term "rapist" has for over a century held the definition of "a person who forces sexual acts upon an unwilling party", Ergo, regardless of the intended use of the suffix "-ist", the word has transcended the original definition due to its use in the commons.

This ideology has been thrust upon me by four years of reading a variety of grammar and language usage texts, such as "Growth and Structure of the English Language" by Otto Jesperson. It's a fun way to look at language - as a growing organism - rather than a staunch set of rules.

[Smurfette Principle]

Besides, if -ist means "artist" and -er means "performer of action," then rappers would be rapists and rapists would be rapers.

[The Right Honourable Mlle Antéchrist]

I hope the fucker that did this gets raped himself- with a razor blade and sand paper covered dildo attached to a power drill!

I'd rather not wish rape on anyone, regardless of how vile a person they might be. Eye for an eye is bullshit.

Also, isn't that pic kind of NSFW?

[MaybeNever]

I hope the fucker that did this gets raped himself- with a razor blade and sand paper covered dildo attached to a power drill!

I'd rather not wish rape on anyone, regardless of how vile a person they might be. Eye for an eye is bullshit.

Also, isn't that pic kind of NSFW?

I'd agree with you, but there's a certain value in a person experiencing firsthand the pain that he or she has inflicted on others. I'm not comfortable saying that this justifies rape in any sense, however, but I can see an argument for it.

[Tolpuddle Martyr]

*pukes*

That's all.

[jumpingjackflash]