1. Nothing stops students from praying in school. That is absolutely still allowed and if you say it isn't, you're at best uninformed. What it does mean is that public property (money, lands, etc) cannot be used to endorse religion, which means public school teachers, being government employees and paid out of the public purse, cannot endorse religion while in their role as teachers. It also means public lands cannot be used for nativity scenes unless all religious and nonreligious displays are allowed. While I will concede that non-Christians are not being forced to convert, they are nonetheless being imposed upon by being forced to subsidize views with which they disagree.
2. Which is what matters. The government (not the "form of government" as you claimed) is secular, whatever the religious views of the populace.
3. Trump also started the policy of zero-tolerance family separation and only stopped after a few months because the courts ripped him (and Jefferson (as in Davis) Beauregard Sessions III) a new one.
Not only are you trying to defend factual errors and reprehensible actions, you're not even doing it well.
1. Nothing stops students from praying in school. That is absolutely still allowed and if you say it isn't, you're at best uninformed. What it does mean is that public property (money, lands, etc) cannot be used to endorse religion, which means public school teachers, being government employees and paid out of the public purse, cannot endorse religion while in their role as teachers. It also means public lands cannot be used for nativity scenes unless all religious and nonreligious displays are allowed. While I will concede that non-Christians are not being forced to convert, they are nonetheless being imposed upon by being forced to subsidize views with which they disagree.
2. Which is what matters. The government (not the "form of government" as you claimed) is secular, whatever the religious views of the populace.
3. Trump also started the policy of zero-tolerance family separation and only stopped after a few months because the courts ripped him (and Jefferson (as in Davis) Beauregard Sessions III) a new one.
Not only are you trying to defend factual errors and reprehensible actions, you're not even doing it well.
1. But that is violating the teacher’s freedom of religion. Teachers leading students in prayers and promoting Christianity does not violate other people’s freedoms because prayer can be optional. And usually other religious displays are allowed, it is just that the towns that have nativity scenes are majority Christian, so there aren’t many people of other religions that display their religions in the public square.
2. But that does not ban members of the government from promoting religion as long as one sect does not dominate over another.
3. Well the reason why there was the unfortunate family seperation is because it was Trump’s only choice because when arresting the illegal immigrants, the adults are put into the American justice system and are therefore put into adult detention centers. It wouldn’t make sense and would be crueler to put children into adult detention centers. To reunite the families, the solution is to speed up the detention process so that the families are reunited upon deportation. And from Brietbart news
“Obama and Democrats Incentivized This ‘Family Separation’
Until Obama came along, illegal border crossings primarily involved young, single men. Obama incentivized the idea of dragging minor children along on this dangerous journey (where many children are sexually assaulted) through his policy of “catch and release.”
Once word got out that illegals with small children would be let loose into America, the number of children crossing the border exploded.
Again, the last thing decent people want is for the American government to further incentivize the cruel act of bringing small children along on this brutal trip across the border, which is exactly what Trump is hoping to stop with his zero tolerance policy.”
So again, his policy stopped the incentive for illegal aliens to drag them dragging them on a brutal dangerous journey walking them across miles and miles of desert where they could die on the way. So it is the illegal aliens who are the ones that are guilty of child abuse for bringing the children on a cruel brutal journey across the desert.