0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.
You know what's really dumb about that picture? I think it's using screenshots from a movie about the Crusades, when Jews suffered horribly.
Religion is regarded by the common man as true, by the wise man as false, and by the powerful man as useful
Yeah, if the pagans are so smart, why did Jesus invade Pagan-land on the back of a dragon and kill them all!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siege_of_Ma%27arraI'll just leave this here.
@ guizonde: I think I like the way you think.
Warning: Biohazardously Awesome
Quote from: Ultimate Paragon on October 27, 2015, 02:54:36 pmYou know what's really dumb about that picture? I think it's using screenshots from a movie about the Crusades, when Jews suffered horribly.One first-hand account of the Crusades stuck with me because it described dismembered "Saracen" and Jewish bodies, and knights riding through the Temple in Jerusalem where the blood was high enough to touch the horses' bridles. And then, the (Christian) author gives thanks to God for allowing them to commit such butchery.
Quote from: lord gibbon on October 29, 2015, 06:41:05 pmhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siege_of_Ma%27arraI'll just leave this here.i fail to see the problem by skimming the article. mind giving me a heads-up? it's basically about crusaders delving into cannibalism of saracens. or am i missing something?i mean, sure it's tasteless (pun intended), but it's a wikipedia article. what's wrong with it (apart from the usual caveats of wikipedia)?
Quote from: guizonde on October 29, 2015, 07:02:56 pmQuote from: lord gibbon on October 29, 2015, 06:41:05 pmhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siege_of_Ma%27arraI'll just leave this here.i fail to see the problem by skimming the article. mind giving me a heads-up? it's basically about crusaders delving into cannibalism of saracens. or am i missing something?i mean, sure it's tasteless (pun intended), but it's a wikipedia article. what's wrong with it (apart from the usual caveats of wikipedia)?The fact that the crusaders literally ate babies?
Quote from: lord gibbon on October 29, 2015, 07:11:34 pmQuote from: guizonde on October 29, 2015, 07:02:56 pmQuote from: lord gibbon on October 29, 2015, 06:41:05 pmhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siege_of_Ma%27arraI'll just leave this here.i fail to see the problem by skimming the article. mind giving me a heads-up? it's basically about crusaders delving into cannibalism of saracens. or am i missing something?i mean, sure it's tasteless (pun intended), but it's a wikipedia article. what's wrong with it (apart from the usual caveats of wikipedia)?The fact that the crusaders literally ate babies?To be fair, they didn't have much choice.
Quote from: Ultimate Paragon on October 29, 2015, 07:19:30 pmQuote from: lord gibbon on October 29, 2015, 07:11:34 pmQuote from: guizonde on October 29, 2015, 07:02:56 pmQuote from: lord gibbon on October 29, 2015, 06:41:05 pmhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siege_of_Ma%27arraI'll just leave this here.i fail to see the problem by skimming the article. mind giving me a heads-up? it's basically about crusaders delving into cannibalism of saracens. or am i missing something?i mean, sure it's tasteless (pun intended), but it's a wikipedia article. what's wrong with it (apart from the usual caveats of wikipedia)?The fact that the crusaders literally ate babies?To be fair, they didn't have much choice....wait, are you seriously trying to defend EATING BABIES?
I'll stop eating beef lamb and pork the same day they start letting me eat vegetarians.
Life for the sake of life means nothing.