I see what you are doing there, Queen, but I don't think it's necessary. He implied he asked the question after the advice and it was clear enough that the "misunderstanding" wouldn't have happened if he had read the answer before posting here.
I may be misunderstanding what you're saying, but I believe you mean that he asked the LGBTQ board to ask about the definition after the "misunderstanding" here (which is the last three pages of this thread).
However, I asked the question because if you google search what he quoted from the "LGBT" board (hint, it's Quora.com), the answer he quoted was posted on August 29, 2015 (37 weeks ago, yes I counted). This indicates that he didn't go to an LGBTQ forum and ask the question (like he claims he did), but went looking on the internet for something he could offer as an answer that conforms substantially to what he claims (as his quote does, saying "So it's a bit like this [sic] metaphor: do you have to have fur to be a mammal? No, you have to be a part of the mammalia class. But pretty much all mammals have some kind of hair at some point in their life (even if it's just tiny peach fuzz").
I'm not surprised to have caught our captain of intellectual dishonesty in a lie, but for the life of me I just wish that our Christlike intellectual could be a little bit more Christlike, and tell the fucking truth.