Well, they shouldn't have dressed like that. / Well, they should have taken more safety precautions. / Well, they shouldn't have been there.
Just because the theft was easier to do due to (ok, that sounded silly) poor safety precautions does not mean that the hackers aren't 100% responsible of their own actions.
Granted that I do believe that the victim being careless is also stupid. Doesn't mean that they were "asking for it" just that they were stupid.
And since we are talking about victim blamin I might as well put this out as well. Victim blaming and rape cases: Even though the rapist is still 100% guilty of rape, which is not reduced simply by the victim placing himself/herself into a position where the rape is easier, in some cases the victim really has been a dumbass. Here's the thing though, this is not some mathematical equation where the victim bearing some responsibility of his/her becoming a victim would also mean that the rapist is less than 100% guilty of his/her own actions.
Now the ones who claim that "someone deserved to get raped because of X" on the other hand can go eat a bag of cocks. No one deserves that.
I guess I'm not good at explaining my point here. It's just that in the whole "victim blaming issue" I don't think either of the extremes is right. Nothing the victim did can give the rapist a right to rape that person, so no they didn't "deserve that." No clothing or reckless behaviour is a justification for rape. But on the other hand, in the other extreme are people who get furious over any criticism of the victims behaviour. Sometimes the victim really has been stupid. No, still not a "justification" for rape* but for some people ANY criticism of the victims actions is taboo.
*And if I hadn't seen so much evidence for it I would not believe that there are people who want rapists to be released from charges just because of the victim somehow "deserving to be raped." Like for example the comments from Steubenville case. Getting so drunk that you pass out? Stupid. Does that mean that the people who took advantage of her are somehow not rapists? No. No one forced their hands, no one made them do it, they themselves were responsible for what they did.
So no, I'm not saying there should be a reduced sentence for cases where the victim was dumb.