The thing is that you can support "Social Justice" and still think that many of the "Social Justice Warriors" are crazy.
We have this thread to highlight the times when bad things are supported in the name of SJW agenda and the other thread for the good things they do.
The link that Davedan posted was an example of things that need to be said and how victims of rape are often blamed as if they deserved it simply because they dressed in some sort of way or have previously been known to have sex... Which is actually thing that happens in Finnish court. The defender will try to use the victims history as a migitating factor by digging up facts to prove that she may have been promiscuous before or gotten drunk at some point of her life which for some reason makes it ok to rape her or something...
But saying that rape is a serious crime and victim blaming must stop and at the same time thinking that this:
Meanwhile in radfem land:
Q:So it's a bad thing to like down right rough sex?
A:you’re not a shitty person for it, but yeah asserting dominance over a woman via sex is rape.
Because a woman enjoying rough sex is totally akin to rape.
...Is over the board and also insults women because it claims that women who like rough sex are being raped but just don't realize (which leads to the concept of "we need to protect [insert group] because they are being oppressed but are too stupid to realize that they are being oppressed. Also kink-shaming.) it is not only wrong but harmful for those who try to fight against real rape victims.