0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Life for the sake of life means nothing.
Quote from: Art Vandelay on July 22, 2014, 11:27:06 pmI'm not particularly sure how this scheme is supposed to alleviate overcrowding and housing prices in the first place. I just don't see how having rich and poor people living in the same building is any more space efficient than separate buildings for each price range.According to the article, it's a tax thing. They get tax credits of some sort for affordable housing.
I'm not particularly sure how this scheme is supposed to alleviate overcrowding and housing prices in the first place. I just don't see how having rich and poor people living in the same building is any more space efficient than separate buildings for each price range.
Quote from: Sigmaleph on July 23, 2014, 12:30:15 pmQuote from: Art Vandelay on July 22, 2014, 11:27:06 pmI'm not particularly sure how this scheme is supposed to alleviate overcrowding and housing prices in the first place. I just don't see how having rich and poor people living in the same building is any more space efficient than separate buildings for each price range.According to the article, it's a tax thing. They get tax credits of some sort for affordable housing.I get that, I'm wondering why the government is issuing tax credits for that sort of thing in the first place.
It doesn't concern you, Sister, that kind of absolutist view of the universe? Right and wrong determined solely by a single all-knowing, all powerful being whose judgment cannot be questioned and in whose name the most horrendous acts can be sanctioned without appeal?
Being required by someone else’s religious beliefs to behave contrary to one’s sexual identity is degrading and disrespectful.
Quote from: Art Vandelay on July 23, 2014, 09:21:31 pmQuote from: Sigmaleph on July 23, 2014, 12:30:15 pmQuote from: Art Vandelay on July 22, 2014, 11:27:06 pmI'm not particularly sure how this scheme is supposed to alleviate overcrowding and housing prices in the first place. I just don't see how having rich and poor people living in the same building is any more space efficient than separate buildings for each price range.According to the article, it's a tax thing. They get tax credits of some sort for affordable housing.I get that, I'm wondering why the government is issuing tax credits for that sort of thing in the first place.To entice people to do that sort of thing.
Quote from: dpareja on July 23, 2014, 09:24:04 pmQuote from: Art Vandelay on July 23, 2014, 09:21:31 pmQuote from: Sigmaleph on July 23, 2014, 12:30:15 pmQuote from: Art Vandelay on July 22, 2014, 11:27:06 pmI'm not particularly sure how this scheme is supposed to alleviate overcrowding and housing prices in the first place. I just don't see how having rich and poor people living in the same building is any more space efficient than separate buildings for each price range.According to the article, it's a tax thing. They get tax credits of some sort for affordable housing.I get that, I'm wondering why the government is issuing tax credits for that sort of thing in the first place.To entice people to do that sort of thing....Seriously? Wow...
Pardon the interruption, good sir/lady; there are aspects of your behavior that I find quite unbecoming, and I must insist most strenuously that I be permitted to assist in resolving these behaviors through the repeated high-velocity cranial introduction of particularly firm building materials.
GIVE ME KNOWLEDGE OR I WILL PUT A CAP IN YO ASS!