Lessee
Transabled
Transethinc
Transspecies(i don't see why otherkin haven't outright adopted this, some certainly imply it enough)
Transfat(no I'm not kidding)
I'm waiting to find a transtrans before much longer. If only for amusement's sake. And now that I think about it, I have seen someone claiming to have the spirit of a turnip or something, so transplant isn't out of the realm of possibility. Sanity, sure, possibility, apparently not.
But oddly enough, that damn * is pretty much used for the same point it'd be used as a wild card, anything trans, being inclusive and all.
Well so as not to create a strawman, the asterisk does not include those groups, it includes groups like "crossdressers, intersexed, genderqueer, drag performers, etc" and not trivial snowflake groups like the ones you've listed.
My problem with using it is, again, I feel it serves no real purpose. If we are referring to the full group as trans, why can't we have two different meanings of the word "trans?" We have two different meanings of many words, "you" in this instance being very similar to what I'm trying to say. Heck, we could even use "trans" as the umbrella term and then use phrases like "transman, transwoman, and transgender" as the specific groups. If the asterisk folk want a catch all umbrella term, please come up with it. It's just so trivial that people write "trans*" and think they're somehow less bigoted than one who doesn't. They don't say "trans asterisk" in they're speech, so clearly they only care about trans et. al. people when they write (sarcasm). Even if we did need another catch all, I feel "et. al." or, again, "genderqueer" is far better than that damn asterisk. I cringe every time I see it.
And yes Sim, I'm being dead serious about the asterisk. I know its history as a search engine wild card and I still think its a difference that's being shoehorned in to label those who are accepting and point out those who are bigoted.