This is really funny that people think a misspelling of a name that is not common in English, or according to Google anywhere, is disrespectful. Most other names are English-based, shortened, or easy to remember. For example, if I had to write out the full names of Sigmalaeph, Ravynoushunter, or Cerim Treascure, I couldn't do it. Hence why I call them Sigma, Ravy, and Cerim, respectively. Upon being told that my misspelling was interpreted as disrespect, I thought, "that's silly to take a misspelling of an unusual name that way," and didn't think much else. In fact, I read his name, but forget it by the next time I had to post.. Next time I had to bring it up in conversation, I tried my best to remember, and wrote out each time--instead of copy and pasting-- "guizonode (or however it's spelled)."
You don't have to believe it, but I have no trouble speaking my mind. I also do not lie. If I wanted to take a dig at someone, misspelling a name is the last thing I would do.
Also, it is an outright lie to say that it was about punks and hierarchy, in particular after my last post pointed out that he state Laura Jane Grace belonged here because "um, famous and notorious people are just regular people, so sometimes they can be wrong or say things the wrong way. i'm with the quote's sentiment, but not the way the message is written. one offhand, one ad hominem, and one returning the question does not make for good argumentation, objectively" (emphasis added). His point boiled down to she belongs in WSJ because she didn't handle a transphobic troll in the most professional and responsible way possible. This is what most people seem to conveniently ignore, instead choosing to argue polity or spelling.
But it's obvious that this is getting no where, so people can respond and argue, but absent a direct question rule invocation, I'm done with this.