Worst of Social Justice

[Witchyjoshy]

Huh, that one's actually new to me.

[Sigmaleph]

Dear white feminist shitlords. You are among the most privilege group on the planet, if not the most. It doesn’t matter if you’re a feminist (in fact most white and jewish feminist just want to benefit themselves and their race with feminism and cause the destruction of PoC cultures and societies, and you can NEVER experience or know of the experience of People of Colour), accept and CHECK your FUCKING privilege.

You like to ignore it and whenever the topic gets brought up, you divert it with blame solely being on the white men only, but your privilege exceeds white men and goes unchecked in your circle jerks of acting like you care about PoC’s or WoC’s when in reality just want to be a black sheep with a victim complex.

Because your race institutionally controls everything and benefits from the struggles of PoC and WoC, you can not be the victim of the institution of rape (which your race has created), rape is a power institution, rape can only occur when an oppressed individual (Women of Colour inclusively) is sexually violated by a individual of power (White men), because of your institutional privilege in society and throughout history, you have immense power influence and privilege; YOU CAN NEVER BE RAPE BECAUSE OF THIS. You can be sexually violated, but not raped. Get it right if you want to be true allies in ending white supremacy and white privilege.

I’m sick and tired of spoiled white bitches who cry about it when you can never be a victim of it, your privilege in the past has gotten a lot of Men of Colour LYNCHED because of your constant lies and false accusations which occur daily. Even today thousands of innocent men of colour are falsely convicted and prosecuted. Because of your privilege you have maintained a position in society which with the point of your finger has gotten men of colour lynched and executed. Check it and educate yourselves.

This is the same anti-Semite I posted about in the Things People Say on the Internet thread.

Intersectionality, amirite?

Dear so-called social justice people:

Every time you even consider the possibility of saying that non-consensual sex wasn't rape because of reason X, I want you to perform the following exercise: Imagine yourself in front of a mirror. Imagine that the person looking back is the most disgusting men's rights activist ever to post on Reddit. Imagine your reflection saying the words "It wasn't rape, she was dressed like a slut".

If you are not sufficiently disgusted, I give up. You are a lost cause.

[Flying Mint Bunny!]

Dear white feminist shitlords. You are among the most privilege group on the planet, if not the most. It doesn’t matter if you’re a feminist (in fact most white and jewish feminist just want to benefit themselves and their race with feminism and cause the destruction of PoC cultures and societies, and you can NEVER experience or know of the experience of People of Colour), accept and CHECK your FUCKING privilege.

You like to ignore it and whenever the topic gets brought up, you divert it with blame solely being on the white men only, but your privilege exceeds white men and goes unchecked in your circle jerks of acting like you care about PoC’s or WoC’s when in reality just want to be a black sheep with a victim complex.

Because your race institutionally controls everything and benefits from the struggles of PoC and WoC, you can not be the victim of the institution of rape (which your race has created), rape is a power institution, rape can only occur when an oppressed individual (Women of Colour inclusively) is sexually violated by a individual of power (White men), because of your institutional privilege in society and throughout history, you have immense power influence and privilege; YOU CAN NEVER BE RAPE BECAUSE OF THIS. You can be sexually violated, but not raped. Get it right if you want to be true allies in ending white supremacy and white privilege.

I’m sick and tired of spoiled white bitches who cry about it when you can never be a victim of it, your privilege in the past has gotten a lot of Men of Colour LYNCHED because of your constant lies and false accusations which occur daily. Even today thousands of innocent men of colour are falsely convicted and prosecuted. Because of your privilege you have maintained a position in society which with the point of your finger has gotten men of colour lynched and executed. Check it and educate yourselves.

This is the same anti-Semite I posted about in the Things People Say on the Internet thread.

Intersectionality, amirite?

Dear so-called social justice people:

Every time you even consider the possibility of saying that non-consensual sex wasn't rape because of reason X, I want you to perform the following exercise: Imagine yourself in front of a mirror. Imagine that the person looking back is the most disgusting men's rights activist ever to post on Reddit. Imagine your reflection saying the words "It wasn't rape, she was dressed like a slut".

If you are not sufficiently disgusted, I give up. You are a lost cause.

I think they have a nerve accusing all white feminists of having victim complexes, when their whole world revolves around constantly complaining about how no one else is capable of suffering as much as them.

[Damen]

I have to ask; is this guy serious? Everything I have come to learn about asexuality can be summed up in "no desire to have sex." Not that an asexual won't have sex, just that there is no desire for it. But it strikes me that this guy is basically telling me I can call myself an asexual just because I haven't gotten laid in almost a year.

I really think this is just a case of Special Snowflake Syndrome, though.

[Sigmaleph]

I have to ask; is this guy serious? Everything I have come to learn about asexuality can be summed up in "no desire to have sex." Not that an asexual won't have sex, just that there is no desire for it. But it strikes me that this guy is basically telling me I can call myself an asexual just because I haven't gotten laid in almost a year.

The exact opposite. They're saying that being asexual is a matter of not experiencing sexual attraction, and whether they have sex or not is an entirely different question.

[PosthumanHeresy]

I have to ask; is this guy serious? Everything I have come to learn about asexuality can be summed up in "no desire to have sex." Not that an asexual won't have sex, just that there is no desire for it. But it strikes me that this guy is basically telling me I can call myself an asexual just because I haven't gotten laid in almost a year.

The exact opposite. They're saying that being asexual is a matter of not experiencing sexual attraction, and whether they have sex or not is an entirely different question.

Which as a whole nother can of worms. If they're having sex, and they're not being raped, they clearly have sexual attraction. They're getting boners/wet.

[Witchyjoshy]

Ah, no, not necessarily.

Being aroused is a physical thing.  The body responds to stimulation of such even without the urging of the mind.  Just because you have no sexual attraction doesn't mean your body doesn't react to stimuli with arousal.

Logic like yours is often used to defend the notion that men can't be raped, because "penetration has to be involved, and men don't get hard if they aren't wanting to have sex."  Which is biologically wrong.

[PosthumanHeresy]

Ah, no, not necessarily.

Being aroused is a physical thing.  The body responds to stimulation of such even without the urging of the mind.  Just because you have no sexual attraction doesn't mean your body doesn't react to stimuli with arousal.

Logic like yours is often used to defend the notion that men can't be raped, because "penetration has to be involved, and men don't get hard if they aren't wanting to have sex."  Which is biologically wrong.

Okay, but with asexuals, how can they get aroused?

[Witchyjoshy]

Ah, no, not necessarily.

Being aroused is a physical thing.  The body responds to stimulation of such even without the urging of the mind.  Just because you have no sexual attraction doesn't mean your body doesn't react to stimuli with arousal.

Logic like yours is often used to defend the notion that men can't be raped, because "penetration has to be involved, and men don't get hard if they aren't wanting to have sex."  Which is biologically wrong.

Okay, but with asexuals, how can they get aroused?

Do you lack critical reading skills?

[PosthumanHeresy]

Ah, no, not necessarily.

Being aroused is a physical thing.  The body responds to stimulation of such even without the urging of the mind.  Just because you have no sexual attraction doesn't mean your body doesn't react to stimuli with arousal.

Logic like yours is often used to defend the notion that men can't be raped, because "penetration has to be involved, and men don't get hard if they aren't wanting to have sex."  Which is biologically wrong.

Okay, but with asexuals, how can they get aroused?

Do you lack critical reading skills?

No, I figured asexuals could not get aroused, even with stimuli.

[Witchyjoshy]

Ah, no, not necessarily.

Being aroused is a physical thing.  The body responds to stimulation of such even without the urging of the mind.  Just because you have no sexual attraction doesn't mean your body doesn't react to stimuli with arousal.

Logic like yours is often used to defend the notion that men can't be raped, because "penetration has to be involved, and men don't get hard if they aren't wanting to have sex."  Which is biologically wrong.

Okay, but with asexuals, how can they get aroused?

Do you lack critical reading skills?

No, I figured asexuals could not get aroused, even with stimuli.

No, the body often gets aroused against the will of the mind.

It's one of the things that makes rape as horrible as it actually is.

[PosthumanHeresy]

Ah, no, not necessarily.

Being aroused is a physical thing.  The body responds to stimulation of such even without the urging of the mind.  Just because you have no sexual attraction doesn't mean your body doesn't react to stimuli with arousal.

Logic like yours is often used to defend the notion that men can't be raped, because "penetration has to be involved, and men don't get hard if they aren't wanting to have sex."  Which is biologically wrong.

Okay, but with asexuals, how can they get aroused?

Do you lack critical reading skills?

No, I figured asexuals could not get aroused, even with stimuli.

No, the body often gets aroused against the will of the mind.

It's one of the things that makes rape as horrible as it actually is.

Ahh, okay. Yeah, I thought for asexuals it was pretty much impossible for them to get aroused.

[RavynousHunter]

Asexuals can still experience physical arousal, but likely don't experience the mental side of it that most of us attach to it without even thinking.  That said, an asexual can still have sex and not be raped; they may be (willingly, of course) satisfying the sexual needs of their partner.

[Witchyjoshy]

Ravynous managed to explain it better than I was trying.

[niam2023]

I speak personally, from experience, as I've slept with a few women, and I've not been attracted to their gender.

For me, its more that it felt good and I got something out of it. Not out of attraction to their gender or looks.