Worst of Social Justice

[Captain Jack Harkness]

I never thought I'd see the day where every sexuality is insulted in one post.

Let's hope this person is a Poe.

*I was originally going to replace my last post with this one but since there was a response I'm making a new one.

I'm always amazed and impressed by your ability to find the craziest of crazy people.

[Thejebusfire]

It's a gift.

[Askold]

It's a gift.

Or a curse.

[SpaceProg]

You'll thank her later. 

Sorry.  Having Monk flashbacks.

[Cerim Treascair]

Just as a side note, I say 'namaste' to a friend of mine that runs a gas station store here because it's RESPECTFUL to his culture and I've tried to learn his native tongue in order to simply say hello and goodbye.  It's something NICE to do, and he always smiles.  He's a great guy who I've sat and bullshit with many times over the last few years I've lived here in New York, and he's thanked me outright for trying to learn his native language because it reminds him of home.

Some people are very silly.

[Dakota Bob]

crackerhell-chan, stop being so tsundere~

~desu

[Sigmaleph]

Then you may as well argue that the word 'fag' in any of the common 'definitons' is an etymological fallacy.  It can mean a cigarette, a bundle of sticks OR a derogatory slur against a gay person.  So which one do people "actually mean when they say it"?

No, see, etymological fallacy is when people try to argue that a word can only mean what it meant in the past (e.g. -philia can only mean "love", -phobia can only mean "fear"). In the general case, it's pretty obvious from context what people mean by "fag".

The tumblr post above tries to argue that zoophiles can't be animal rapists because someone who loves animals wouldn't rape them. Nice and all, but nobody is arguing that animal-lovers rape animals. Rather, than sometimes people with a sexual attraction towards animals rape them. Thus, arguing from the "animal-love" interpretation is nonsense.

[Shane for Wax]

I have had people stop following me because I post trans related stuff. Even tho I fucking tag every-fucking-thing to the best of my ability. Haters gon' hate.

Some people go read a tagged post just so that they can complain that they don't like the tagged subject.

Which is really silly, tbh. I have also had people get onto me for being a 'downer' even tho I put personal posts about depression under a read more (aka spoiler tags) and tag it with relevant tags. So all they are doing is bitching at me because they decided to ignore all of my warnings. (When I say get onto me, I actually had someone flat out stop being my friend over my personal posts. The same personal posts that I would lament my lack of friends in meatspace and my trust issues. So basically they were just deciding to specifically go for a sore subject when they decided to stop being my friend).

[Meshakhad]

Fuck you. My best friend is a white Buddhist. And no, he didn't just decide one day that he's now a Buddhist. He went through the whole conversion process at a temple in Seattle, which I witnessed. Also, while taking classes to prepare for conversion, he met a nice girl who is now his wife.

[gyeonghwa]

Trigger warning: Intersectional thinking

There's more than one type of gay porn. Gay4Pay does emulate the the man on woman role but it does it very different way from what the OP thinks. Also she apparently doesn't understand the concept of flip fucking wherein we take turn pleasuring each other. And even at that not all gay porn even have anal penetration. When gay porn is problematic, it's problematic to us and generally because of classist (many gay men cannot find work and resort to porn) and racist reasons (racist caricature within gay porn). But radfems can never wrong men of color, amirite 

Also, my boner disagrees with the idea that I'm not actually sexually attracted to men. Homosocial bonding is a straight male phenomenon. There are some gay men who do engage in that and they are generally those trying to be straight acting. When gay men seek other gay men, we do so because we seek people with similar experiences and understanding. We want to be with people who know what it's like to be scorned for our sexuality, to take these abuses at our developmental ages. We want to be safe, which is also why gay men hang out with lesbians and trans folk (bitch probably believe trans folks are out to ruin women but what ever). AND we existed in societies that doesn't have this Western Patriarchy. What is it with radfems and their inability to think outside of their cultural box? Also pray tell are these radfems gleeful when they see queer men of colored murdered in the streets? Are they gleeful when pictures of mangled gay faces end up on the news? Because siding with the homophobic men by calling us greedy seems to suggest that.

If you have sex with other women simply as a choice, that's fine. I'm not one to denigrate choice either. But don't assume other women choose to do the same. Erasing the ranges of female sexuality, erasing the struggles that comes with it is not how liberation works. As a feminist friend of my said to a bigot (paraphrasing) "The fact that I still see men as sexual and romantic partners despite the fact that men have harmed me through my life, speaks volumes about the innateness of sexuality among humans".

[gyeonghwa]

Funny. I still get called a s j w despite the content of my tumblr.

Which brings me to something I would like to say and never got to: I have since come to revile the term "Social Justice Warrior", simply because it's almost like a buzzword invented to vilify rational-minded people posting about how our society is fucked (when this is true, though rarely exaggerated) instead of just people who want "justice" from the "discrimination" of having an imaginary boy/girlfriend (to where they trivialize the actual struggles of homosexuals, bisexuals, pansexuals and asexuals in society).

On tumblr, it's become a fallacy. I've been told that I'm a SJW for saying social awkwardness doesn't excuse misogynistic or racists behavior. On here, I've been called a SJW for presenting facts about discrepancies in race among things like scholarships. But I still got to give it to that guy that called me a heterophobe when I beat him in a debate about abortion. Which I will post on the things on the internet thread.

[The Right Honourable Mlle Antéchrist]

Riley is a notorious hypocrite in this regard. They don't want people to speak on behalf of black people/black culture (which is a perfectly fair request, mind you), yet feel okay speaking on behalf of every other racial and cultural group and then screaming "oppression" if someone asks them to stop. They're also a major Japanophile, but lose their shit if anyone else shows interest in another culture.

[gyeonghwa]

If you called Riley on their shit, they try to label you as some type of race traitor because people of color are suppose to be a hive mind or something. They tried to get a horde to invade Facsinasian because she doesn't agree with him 100% on the issue of racism faced by Asian.

[I am lizard]

Fuck you. My best friend is a white Buddhist. And no, he didn't just decide one day that he's now a Buddhist. He went through the whole conversion process at a temple in Seattle, which I witnessed. Also, while taking classes to prepare for conversion, he met a nice girl who is now his wife.

Also,apparently both Tumblr and Deviantart are racist as fuck.

[The Right Honourable Mlle Antéchrist]

Incidentally, Riley has said some pretty racist shit themselves -- and I'm not talking about the constant hating on white people, either. Notable examples are referring to several Native women who disagreed with them about something minor as "some Native cunts", claiming that most Asians are "bad" POC, and tons of negatives statements about Jews. And that's not even getting into the Americentrism, which had led to all kinds of downplaying of racial/ethnic issues.