Worst of Social Justice

[I am lizard]

(click to show/hide)

Next time somebody tells you bestiality is okay, show them this.

(click to show/hide)

Because that's where they'll end up.

The argument from force doesn't really support the conclusion that something is wrong. Plenty of homosexuals are still thrown in prison for being homosexual.

Of course, gay sex is between two consenting adults, not an obese middle aged caucasian male and a labrador retriever.

[Ironchew]

Of course, gay sex is between two consenting adults, not an obese middle aged caucasian male and a labrador retriever.

It's one of those situations where you have to prove that some harm happened as a result of intercourse. In the absence of physical harm, that's obviously difficult to demonstrate with animals. A lot of them probably don't even care.

[RavynousHunter]

Of course, gay sex is between two consenting adults, not an obese middle aged caucasian male and a labrador retriever.

It's one of those situations where you have to prove that some harm happened as a result of intercourse. In the absence of physical harm, that's obviously difficult to demonstrate with animals. A lot of them probably don't even care.

Somehow, I doubt that.  Animals do have emotions; granted, they might not have the same depth as a human's, but they're still there.  Plus, there's that whole "no consent" thing...most people are sticklers when it comes to there being proper, informed consent before sex commences.

[Ironchew]

Somehow, I doubt that.  Animals do have emotions; granted, they might not have the same depth as a human's, but they're still there.  Plus, there's that whole "no consent" thing...most people are sticklers when it comes to there being proper, informed consent before sex commences.

My guess is it's in the same category as a dog humping someone's leg. It's humorous and it might gross them out a little, but people don't get into a fit about being violated by a dog.

If chickens were worried about consent, every rooster would be in prison for being a serial rapist.

[RavynousHunter]

Its not the animals that are worried about consent, its us.  Well, at least most of us...but we don't count rapists' views on sex for the same reason we don't count a thief's view on property rights, or a member of the KKK on minority rights.  I still seriously doubt that the animals find it funny to be fucked by a human.  Having an unwanted cock shoved in you is never a positive event, no matter what retarded mental gymnastics you might perform to spin it as such.

[dpareja]

Its not the animals that are worried about consent, its us.  Well, at least most of us...but we don't count rapists' views on sex for the same reason we don't count a thief's view on property rights, or a member of the KKK on minority rights.  I still seriously doubt that the animals find it funny to be fucked by a human.  Having an unwanted cock shoved in you is never a positive event, no matter what retarded mental gymnastics you might perform to spin it as such.

So I suppose the same goes for when a woman decides to penetrate herself with her dog's penis?

[Alehksunos]

Its not the animals that are worried about consent, its us.  Well, at least most of us...but we don't count rapists' views on sex for the same reason we don't count a thief's view on property rights, or a member of the KKK on minority rights.  I still seriously doubt that the animals find it funny to be fucked by a human.  Having an unwanted cock shoved in you is never a positive event, no matter what retarded mental gymnastics you might perform to spin it as such.

So I suppose the same goes for when a woman decides to penetrate herself with her dog's penis?

The fact that dogs (and perhaps other animals) are even trained for vaginal and anal penetration on humans is possibly one of the scariest things I have ever discovered.

Thank you, Encyclopaedia Dramatica, for occasionally providing such dangerous knowledge.

[Ghoti]

We should just make one thread for this discussion so it can stay there as not show up when I'm trying to eat.

[Zygarde]

I'd rather not have a thread discussing the moral repercussions of beastiality  but that's just my opinion.

[Ghoti]

Which would you prefer: having one dedicated, unpleasant thread where people who want to debate this particular topic can, or have it end up in almost every megathread for a few pages? Personally, I'm sick of bits and pieces of this topic popping up seemingly everywhere, only to die down ad lie dormant before anything interesting happens.

[The Right Honourable Mlle Antéchrist]

Having an unwanted cock shoved in you is never a positive event, no matter what retarded mental gymnastics you might perform to spin it as such.

I think his point is that forcibly penetrating an animal isn't really comparable to raping a human, at least as far as the emotional impact, trauma and sense of violation go, not that a dog (or horse, etc.) isn't going to experience distress for the duration of the penetration (or in the aftermath, if its injured in the process).

Edit: Although the comparison to a dog humping your leg kind of falls flat, being that most people aren't going to experience fear or pain during that particular experience.

[Damen]

Yeah, enough of that.

[mythbuster43]

I'd rather not have a thread discussing the moral repercussions of beastiality  but that's just my opinion.

...Did I miss something here? 

[I am lizard]

Yeah, enough of that.

Look tumblr, when someone says "women" in this context they mean biological women.

[Ironchew]

The delay in having Plan B available without a prescription is one of those things you can truthfully say is the Obama administration's fault.