Worst of Social Justice

[MadCatTLX]

"LGBT members should have their voice heard!  But use that voice to speak against us and you're worthless!"

 "They have forfeited the blessing of queer energy that Gaia has bestowed on them." The fuck does that even mean?

[TheUnknown]

So, I'm not going to put a single or specific example, but apparently the tumblr sj community is giving JK Rowling shit again because of a tweet where a Jewish guy asked her if there's any Jewish kids at Hogwarts, and she named a specific character that was Jewish.  Apparently it's insulting to give a character a trait and not make it the focus of a fucking story that has nothing to do with it.  Some are even going so far as insinuating she's racist because of it.

Edit:  Reading more shit posts about it, and now people are bitching about the fucking names of the minority characters.  One literally bitched about the name Parvati Patil.  Because fuck giving ethnically Indian characters Indian names; that's just stereotypical.  Someone compared the names to "giving the only Hispanic person the name 'Juan Carlos'".

[Art Vandelay]

So, I'm not going to put a single or specific example, but apparently the tumblr sj community is giving JK Rowling shit again because of a tweet where a Jewish guy asked her if there's any Jewish kids at Hogwarts, and she named a specific character that was Jewish.

As I recall, there's absolutely zero mention of religion, Judaism or otherwise, in Harry Potter. I'd be willing to bet my favourite man berry that she said that just to keep the Tumblrinas from complaining that she's "excluding minorities" or some bullshit. It's almost cute that she thinks any answer she could possibly give won't result in them screaming hysterically over nothing.

[dpareja]

So, I'm not going to put a single or specific example, but apparently the tumblr sj community is giving JK Rowling shit again because of a tweet where a Jewish guy asked her if there's any Jewish kids at Hogwarts, and she named a specific character that was Jewish.  Apparently it's insulting to give a character a trait and not make it the focus of a fucking story that has nothing to do with it.  Some are even going so far as insinuating she's racist because of it.

Edit:  Reading more shit posts about it, and now people are bitching about the fucking names of the minority characters.  One literally bitched about the name Parvati Patil.  Because fuck giving ethnically Indian characters Indian names; that's just stereotypical.  Someone compared the names to "giving the only Hispanic person the name 'Juan Carlos'".

1. So now I'm curious as to which character this is.

2. Did this person choose those names at random or does said person know something about the Spanish monarchy?

[I am lizard]

So, I'm not going to put a single or specific example, but apparently the tumblr sj community is giving JK Rowling shit again because of a tweet where a Jewish guy asked her if there's any Jewish kids at Hogwarts, and she named a specific character that was Jewish.

As I recall, there's absolutely zero mention of religion, Judaism or otherwise, in Harry Potter. I'd be willing to bet my favourite man berry that she said that just to keep the Tumblrinas from complaining that she's "excluding minorities" or some bullshit. It's almost cute that she thinks any answer she could possibly give won't result in them screaming hysterically over nothing.

I think she was trying to appease the Zionist puppet masters.
Srs answer: I doubt she was really that concerned over ppl getting upset.

[Askold]

I get the Impression that Rowling had a lot more information on the characters than she put in the books. Like Dumbledore being gay.

Those bits of info didn't turn up in the books because they weren't relevant, but her having decided that some characters were Christian, or Jewish or Atheist... I can believe that.

[TheUnknown]

So, I'm not going to put a single or specific example, but apparently the tumblr sj community is giving JK Rowling shit again because of a tweet where a Jewish guy asked her if there's any Jewish kids at Hogwarts, and she named a specific character that was Jewish.  Apparently it's insulting to give a character a trait and not make it the focus of a fucking story that has nothing to do with it.  Some are even going so far as insinuating she's racist because of it.

Edit:  Reading more shit posts about it, and now people are bitching about the fucking names of the minority characters.  One literally bitched about the name Parvati Patil.  Because fuck giving ethnically Indian characters Indian names; that's just stereotypical.  Someone compared the names to "giving the only Hispanic person the name 'Juan Carlos'".

1. So now I'm curious as to which character this is.

Anthony Goldstein

[Art Vandelay]

I get the Impression that Rowling had a lot more information on the characters than she put in the books. Like Dumbledore being gay.

Really? I got the impression that the "Dumbledore is gay" schtick was just an attempt to stay relevant for as long as possible after the last book was published.

[Søren]

"LGBT members should have their voice heard!  But use that voice to speak against us and you're worthless!"

 "They have forfeited the blessing of queer energy that Gaia has bestowed on them." The fuck does that even mean?

*oozes rainbow spooge on you*

[Second Coming of Madman]

(click to show/hide)

You're both stupid. Poster one, go back to raving about Jontron. Poster Two, please re-educate yourself in regards to ethnicity.

[Eiki-mun]

Actually, the Armenian Genocide was pretty damn bad. It's a perfect example of white genocide, as long as you make the assumption that the Ottoman people of Turkey aren't white themselves.

[rookie]

[Harry Potter stuff]

I was under the impression that Harry Potter was fiction. As in made up, not true, pretend.  That's just an assumption, I've never read the books. But anyways, in all the fiction books I've read (not to mention most non fiction) religion rarely comes up unless it's relevant to the story.

[Askold]

Actually, the Armenian Genocide was pretty damn bad. It's a perfect example of white genocide, as long as you make the assumption that the Ottoman people of Turkey aren't white themselves.

...It would be better if people stopped reducing ethnicity to just "white" and "not white" because Armenian Genocide was a genocide done by ethnic group A to ethnic group B but it was more complicated than just that... (I am trying to read the Wikipedia article but this massacre is nauseatingly horrible...)

Another thing is that IF we go with the SJW "race chart" does it matter if those responsible of the massacre are "white" or not? We can still argue that the victims where "white" so doesn't that make it a "white genocide" or does it only count as that if the killers were "POC?"

[Eiki-mun]

Actually, the Armenian Genocide was pretty damn bad. It's a perfect example of white genocide, as long as you make the assumption that the Ottoman people of Turkey aren't white themselves.

...It would be better if people stopped reducing ethnicity to just "white" and "not white" because Armenian Genocide was a genocide done by ethnic group A to ethnic group B but it was more complicated than just that... (I am trying to read the Wikipedia article but this massacre is nauseatingly horrible...)

Another thing is that IF we go with the SJW "race chart" does it matter if those responsible of the massacre are "white" or not? We can still argue that the victims where "white" so doesn't that make it a "white genocide" or does it only count as that if the killers were "POC?"

Well, if we go by the classic SJW playbook, taking a look at Irish/British relations, it's pretty clear that they'd regard the Armenian Genocide as "white people killing white people" and thus not care about it. If the Ottomans were PoC on the other hand... then they'd probably say it's justified or revenge or some bullshit like that.

I wonder how they feel about the Kurdish Genocide.

[Ultimate Paragon]