Holy shit! I seem to have an equivalent on Fstdt Reddit

[Jacob Harrison]

On Fstdt Reddit, there is a user called StellarisJunkie who treats it as his blog and promotes right wing views just like I do here. https://www.reddit.com/r/fstdt/

However a difference is that in one of his posts he seems to be promoting antisemitism while I don’t do that. Nevertheless, I wonder if I should form an alliance with him as part of my plan to restore the true heir to the throne of England because he would probably like to see a reactionary traditional Christian monarchy come to power in Europe and he could help recruit people to my cause with his Reddit posts.

[Tolpuddle Martyr]

Well you smile approvingly at the Spanish Inquisitions treatment of Jews. So are you!

Congrats on working out how to make a sock account you clever boy!

[Jacob Harrison]

Well you smile approvingly at the Spanish Inquisitions treatment of Jews. So are you!

Congrats on working out how to make a sock account you clever boy!

But I put situations like the situation into historical context. The Jews in Spain in that particular time period were bad because they were collaborating with the Muslim invaders. However today, Muslims commit terrorism against Jews so Christians and Jews have a common enemy. And that user on the Fstdt reddit is not my sock account. His posts have a different style. He does not promote the English monarchist cause or Roman Catholicism.

[niam2023]

Thank you for mentioning it.

Whosoever runs the reddit should really get around to boiling that toad.

I don't think its becoming for us to let him turn our reddit into an alt-right blog.

[Jacob Harrison]

I made a post on FSTDT reddit to convince him to help my English monarchist cause. https://www.reddit.com/r/fstdt/comments/a1bkrd/how_to_save_england_and_europe/

[Tolpuddle Martyr]

Well you smile approvingly at the Spanish Inquisitions treatment of Jews. So are you!

Congrats on working out how to make a sock account you clever boy!

But I put situations like the situation into historical context. The Jews in Spain in that particular time period were bad because they were collaborating with the Muslim invaders. However today, Muslims commit terrorism against Jews so Christians and Jews have a common enemy. And that user on the Fstdt reddit is not my sock account. His posts have a different style. He does not promote the English monarchist cause or Roman Catholicism.

Can't you see that in rite contextz ethnic cleansing of da jooz is oh-kay?

No!

[Jacob Harrison]

Well you smile approvingly at the Spanish Inquisitions treatment of Jews. So are you!

Congrats on working out how to make a sock account you clever boy!

But I put situations like the situation into historical context. The Jews in Spain in that particular time period were bad because they were collaborating with the Muslim invaders. However today, Muslims commit terrorism against Jews so Christians and Jews have a common enemy. And that user on the Fstdt reddit is not my sock account. His posts have a different style. He does not promote the English monarchist cause or Roman Catholicism.

Can't you see that in rite contextz ethnic cleansing of da jooz is oh-kay?

No!

The inquisition wasn’t ethnic cleansing, it was forced conversions. And as I said, the Jews were given mercy because they were allowed to leave Spain if they didn’t want to convert.

[Tolpuddle Martyr]

Pretty it up however you like choirboy, forcing a group to ditch their culture to leave the country or forcibly assimilate umder pain of violence, death and torture is is ethnic cleansing. You're just as anti semitic as your pal from reddit, you're probably the same guy but with a different profile.

[Jacob Harrison]

Pretty it up however you like choirboy, forcing a group to ditch their culture to leave the country or forcibly assimilate umder pain of violence, death and torture is is ethnic cleansing. You're just as anti semitic as your pal from reddit, you're probably the same guy but with a different profile.

No I am not anti semitic because I don’t believe in persecuting Jews except for specific situations when it is neccesary like the Spanish Inquisition and I do not think that they are the masterminds behind the global conspiracy.

[Eiki-mun]

Pretty it up however you like choirboy, forcing a group to ditch their culture to leave the country or forcibly assimilate umder pain of violence, death and torture is is ethnic cleansing. You're just as anti semitic as your pal from reddit, you're probably the same guy but with a different profile.

No I am not anti semitic because I don’t believe in persecuting Jews except for specific situations when it is neccesary like the Spanish Inquisition and I do not think that they are the masterminds behind the global conspiracy.

This reminds me of something a friend of mine liked to say. "If you're in favor of free speech, except in certain situations, then you're not really in favor of free speech. You just have your own ideas of when it should be restricted." If you're against persecuting Jews, except in certain situations, then you're not against persecuting Jews, Jacob. You just have your own ideas of when they should be persecuted. You're in favor.

[dpareja]

Pretty it up however you like choirboy, forcing a group to ditch their culture to leave the country or forcibly assimilate umder pain of violence, death and torture is is ethnic cleansing. You're just as anti semitic as your pal from reddit, you're probably the same guy but with a different profile.

No I am not anti semitic because I don’t believe in persecuting Jews except for specific situations when it is neccesary like the Spanish Inquisition and I do not think that they are the masterminds behind the global conspiracy.

This reminds me of something a friend of mine liked to say. "If you're in favor of free speech, except in certain situations, then you're not really in favor of free speech. You just have your own ideas of when it should be restricted." If you're against persecuting Jews, except in certain situations, then you're not against persecuting Jews, Jacob. You just have your own ideas of when they should be persecuted. You're in favor.

Well, in fairness on the free speech point, there are situations in which it is restricted, even in the most libertarian speech regimes: libel, slander, direct threats of violence, and--the big one--copyright.

[Eiki-mun]

Pretty it up however you like choirboy, forcing a group to ditch their culture to leave the country or forcibly assimilate umder pain of violence, death and torture is is ethnic cleansing. You're just as anti semitic as your pal from reddit, you're probably the same guy but with a different profile.

No I am not anti semitic because I don’t believe in persecuting Jews except for specific situations when it is neccesary like the Spanish Inquisition and I do not think that they are the masterminds behind the global conspiracy.

This reminds me of something a friend of mine liked to say. "If you're in favor of free speech, except in certain situations, then you're not really in favor of free speech. You just have your own ideas of when it should be restricted." If you're against persecuting Jews, except in certain situations, then you're not against persecuting Jews, Jacob. You just have your own ideas of when they should be persecuted. You're in favor.

Well, in fairness on the free speech point, there are situations in which it is restricted, even in the most libertarian speech regimes: libel, slander, direct threats of violence, and--the big one--copyright.

Which is still not truly free speech. It's freer speech, but it's not free speech. For the record, I'm not a hyperlibertarian myself - I do feel like there should be necessary restrictions on what people are and are not allowed to say. But from a technical standpoint, if you favor any restrictions on speech, you're not really "for free speech".

[Skybison]

Well, in fairness on the free speech point, there are situations in which it is restricted, even in the most libertarian speech regimes: libel, slander, direct threats of violence, and--the big one--copyright.

Well of course libertarians don't support FREE speech, that's socialism!

We should just let the free market decide who has civil rights, not the jackbooted thugs of the state re-distribute them.

[dpareja]

Pretty it up however you like choirboy, forcing a group to ditch their culture to leave the country or forcibly assimilate umder pain of violence, death and torture is is ethnic cleansing. You're just as anti semitic as your pal from reddit, you're probably the same guy but with a different profile.

No I am not anti semitic because I don’t believe in persecuting Jews except for specific situations when it is neccesary like the Spanish Inquisition and I do not think that they are the masterminds behind the global conspiracy.

This reminds me of something a friend of mine liked to say. "If you're in favor of free speech, except in certain situations, then you're not really in favor of free speech. You just have your own ideas of when it should be restricted." If you're against persecuting Jews, except in certain situations, then you're not against persecuting Jews, Jacob. You just have your own ideas of when they should be persecuted. You're in favor.

Well, in fairness on the free speech point, there are situations in which it is restricted, even in the most libertarian speech regimes: libel, slander, direct threats of violence, and--the big one--copyright.

Which is still not truly free speech. It's freer speech, but it's not free speech. For the record, I'm not a hyperlibertarian myself - I do feel like there should be necessary restrictions on what people are and are not allowed to say. But from a technical standpoint, if you favor any restrictions on speech, you're not really "for free speech".

Sure, but in that case there are very few people who are "really 'for free speech'", since I think there's general agreement even among the most libertarian speech advocates that the four matters I listed are reasonable restrictions on the right, and the main argument is over the precise definitions of each.

[Askold]

Saying that you don't support genocide EXCEPT when it is "necessary" is not the same as saying you don't support genocide.