Sky, I'd like to start by leveling with you. While I can understand why you consider the Lolcow Wiki articles on Brianna Wu to be transphobic, I don't agree with your idea that it's a "transphobic conspiracy theory". From my perspective, the article's tone isn't "wow, look at this freaky [transphobic slur]", it's "this woman is lying about her background and we have evidence". Maybe I'm reading it wrong (I've done that in the past, as you no doubt already know), but that's my reading.
What I will agree with you on, however, is that the evidence they present isn't exactly airtight. They say they have "incontrovertible" proof, but it could very well have been altered. So I'd like to try and kill two birds with one stone. To settle this disagreement and determine whether the evidence the article presents isn't just made up, I'd like to have a little wager. We do our own background check on Wu using the same resources the Lolcow Wiki claims to have used. If the check doesn't give evidence of Brianna Wu being a transwoman, I will take back any and all hurtful things I said about you, agree that the article is transphobic, and not treat the Lolcow Wiki as a valid source again. But if it does, you take back every hurtful thing you said about me, agree that the article isn't transphobic, and treat the Lolcow Wiki as a valid source.
Of course, this is dependent on whether you agree to the bet. You in?
P.S. I put this in Forum Games because, technically, a bet is a game of chance.